while there is a very small fraction of a % of posters here who are legit racists, as there are in every single community/sub group, i strongly suspect the majority here are here to paint all trump supporters as racists.
Speaking from the perspective of the spiritual war between good and evil, I'm fairly certain that's the case every single time domestic racism becomes a social justice issue.
I can't speak to "spiritual wars", and not certain how that applies to racism, but i do know two things...
Whenever there's someone trying to discredit trump supporters one of their go-to's is "racism".
And whenever there is a coordinated attack on any part of the .win network from the media, there is a pre-emptive flooding of these racist's spewing garbage.
Now I'm not here to tell people what to think, but at least be honest. If you're a racist and you've got your own reasons then you're free to feel however about whatever.
But the dishonest tactic of coming here and pretending to be what you think we are... just to reinforce your tired weak hollow arguments... is pathetic and sad.
If they have to lie to prove their point then the point sucks and perhaps shills should be spending their time being open minded instead of trying to demonize people that they don't understand.
CNN's Acosta: Mr. President, Adolf Hitler used toilet paper. What are you, literally Hitler? Will you disavow toilet paper right now and promise the American people and the Constitution that you will quit wiping your butt like a fascist, you Jew-loving nazi bigot?
A post like that is just going to get the people to agree out of spite and trolling.
I'm sure it was buried in a thread concerning some woman in a position of power who is abusing her position to do significant damage to the freedoms and liberties of people in this country.
You aren't going to get people defending that statement in a thread like that.
It doesn't mean everyone here hates women, or thinks women should have no leadership positions, it just means some woman in a leadership position did something so shitty that nobody would bother downvoting something disparaging towards her or women like her.
Whatever, ladies. "Placing" anyone "in positions of leadership" is wrong. What is right is allowing leaders to emerge, female or not. It was likely upvoted because it is correct, it's a statement of support for merit based emergence, rather than forced favoritism. This is something of a crux right here.
First problem I see which this situation is you have to disable CSS to get the downvote button to show. Not many people know that, not many at all. Unless I am wrong? Is there a different way to get the downvote button to display without having to disable CSS?
Having only an upvote button, IMO, fosters an echo chamber of reaffirmation.
while there is a very small fraction of a % of posters here who are legit racists, as there are in every single community/sub group, i strongly suspect the majority here are here to paint all trump supporters as racists.
Speaking from the perspective of the spiritual war between good and evil, I'm fairly certain that's the case every single time domestic racism becomes a social justice issue.
I can't speak to "spiritual wars", and not certain how that applies to racism, but i do know two things...
Whenever there's someone trying to discredit trump supporters one of their go-to's is "racism".
And whenever there is a coordinated attack on any part of the .win network from the media, there is a pre-emptive flooding of these racist's spewing garbage.
Now I'm not here to tell people what to think, but at least be honest. If you're a racist and you've got your own reasons then you're free to feel however about whatever.
But the dishonest tactic of coming here and pretending to be what you think we are... just to reinforce your tired weak hollow arguments... is pathetic and sad.
If they have to lie to prove their point then the point sucks and perhaps shills should be spending their time being open minded instead of trying to demonize people that they don't understand.
Exactly.
Same aim as when fake journos ask Trump "What does it say about you that youre so popular with white supremacists and neo-nazis??"
Trying to smear a good man by falsely linking him to bad ones.
Bingo...
Hitler was a vegetarian.
CNN's Acosta: Mr. President, Adolf Hitler used toilet paper. What are you, literally Hitler? Will you disavow toilet paper right now and promise the American people and the Constitution that you will quit wiping your butt like a fascist, you Jew-loving nazi bigot?
Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore, vegetarians are Hitler.
Turn about is fair play.
Goose gandering the sauce.
Heh.
I bet his dog was soooo happy when Hitler came home at night.
Hitlers dog LOVED Hitler.
Clearly all dogs are white supremacist's.
A post like that is just going to get the people to agree out of spite and trolling.
I'm sure it was buried in a thread concerning some woman in a position of power who is abusing her position to do significant damage to the freedoms and liberties of people in this country.
You aren't going to get people defending that statement in a thread like that.
It doesn't mean everyone here hates women, or thinks women should have no leadership positions, it just means some woman in a leadership position did something so shitty that nobody would bother downvoting something disparaging towards her or women like her.
Whatever, ladies. "Placing" anyone "in positions of leadership" is wrong. What is right is allowing leaders to emerge, female or not. It was likely upvoted because it is correct, it's a statement of support for merit based emergence, rather than forced favoritism. This is something of a crux right here.
First problem I see which this situation is you have to disable CSS to get the downvote button to show. Not many people know that, not many at all. Unless I am wrong? Is there a different way to get the downvote button to display without having to disable CSS?
Having only an upvote button, IMO, fosters an echo chamber of reaffirmation.