Frankly I find these type of 'predictions' about the MRNA vaccine to have about as much validity as the Imperial University projection of COVID deaths early in the plandemic. Anyone else find it odd how over the weekend we had three vax centers get, quite publicly, shut down due to adverse reactions? They could have hit the 'mute' button on these sites shutting down if they wanted to. I really believe both sides are getting played pretty heavy here while the war drums beat in Ukraine and the Pacific Islands.
It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA. Do you think this was without possible consequence?
I was under the impression that the antivaxers, the side I am on, believe that mRNA science, being a brand new thing, that the final results or affects are unknown.
What is unknown, is unknown to both vaxers and antivaxers. Why I'm an antivaxer is because I follow a "why take a change" way of thinking, which seem a common sense approach to me.
According to vaxxers you are taking a chance by not getting it. No amount of logic will win these peóple over because it's not one person. No one can win over a mob but that doesn't mean the mob is right. Keep up the good fight!
I have become silent against the force of the stampede. People I dearly love are rushing to get the vaccine and then proudly bragging about it on social media. No questions asked, no objections allowed. I have come to realize I have as much chance of talking them out of getting vaccinated as talking someone out of their religion. The vaccine is their act of faith in their gods of science/ pharmaceuticals/ government/ media - the whole evil pantheon. When the earth shakes because of stampede, all you can do is get out of the way and watch the herd thunder by. And you definitely don’t want to join it.
It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA.
Except the opposite is "common knowledge" for anyone who has studied and done actual experiments in cell and molecular biology.
Our cells are completely full of mRNA at all times. It is the primary path of information and function change in every cell of every lifeform on Earth. If mRNA that has made it to the cytosol modified DNA in any regular fashion life would cease to exist. In fact, life would have never existed in the first place.
It would be like if every software program on your computer was constantly rewriting the information on your hard drive at random. How long would your computer be able to function? Minutes? Seconds? Its virtually exactly the same thing.
Once again you are talking about naturally occurring mRNA. You have no idea how the synthetic mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to get around the normal cell responses in the body.
Since this is a technology that has never been used on humans before, and has resulted in 100% death of test animals in SARS-CoV-1 vaccine studies, prudence would indicate a wait-and-see approach is the best way to maximize one's chances.
Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”
But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”
It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”
What you postulate at the end actually happened to me once. Around a decade ago I got a computer virus that added exactly 1 byte to every file on the PC. The machine was instantly and completely crippled.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Aa9Q8vUXNW2S/
This is an interview with Dr. Tenpenny. She’s been researching vaccines for 20 years and has put in over 40,000 hours of research into scientific literature. She’s one of the leading doctors delving into the studies. She’s not the only doctor making these claims. These mRNA vaccines have never been used on humans before and were only approved bc it was declared an emergency. In the animal trials, ALL of the animals ended up dying after being reintroduced to garden variety coronavirus. This is not a joke, and I wouldn’t be so quick to write it off as their are doctors out there dedicating their life to look into this.
Agree completely. This is what people don't understand. It's not about the vax now, it's about your body's response later to the virus if you are vaxxed. And few have the info that, as you said, ALL the animals tested in previous attempts at Corona virus vaxxes died. This is why they skipped animal trials with covid and went straight to vaxxing humans. People getting vaxxed are the trials.
You can boil it all down to a vaccine is a vaccine,
But aestrazennica uses DNA as the delivery
While pfizer and maderna use mRna
While JandJ uses traditional means (no mrna or dna)
So the pathways each vax uses is very different and not the same. Regardless, HCQ and Ivermectin is the only way to go...
Frankly I find these type of 'predictions' about the MRNA vaccine to have about as much validity as the Imperial University projection of COVID deaths early in the plandemic. Anyone else find it odd how over the weekend we had three vax centers get, quite publicly, shut down due to adverse reactions? They could have hit the 'mute' button on these sites shutting down if they wanted to. I really believe both sides are getting played pretty heavy here while the war drums beat in Ukraine and the Pacific Islands.
The exception here, is that this prediction is based upon what and how the human body replicates; not based on a mathematical model.
If I inject a rat with cancer, it's not a mathematical model that says the cancer will likely spread, and negatively affect the well-being of the rat.
It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA. Do you think this was without possible consequence?
It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA. Do you think this was without possible consequence?
I was under the impression that the antivaxers, the side I am on, believe that mRNA science, being a brand new thing, that the final results or affects are unknown.
What is unknown, is unknown to both vaxers and antivaxers. Why I'm an antivaxer is because I follow a "why take a change" way of thinking, which seem a common sense approach to me.
According to vaxxers you are taking a chance by not getting it. No amount of logic will win these peóple over because it's not one person. No one can win over a mob but that doesn't mean the mob is right. Keep up the good fight!
I have become silent against the force of the stampede. People I dearly love are rushing to get the vaccine and then proudly bragging about it on social media. No questions asked, no objections allowed. I have come to realize I have as much chance of talking them out of getting vaccinated as talking someone out of their religion. The vaccine is their act of faith in their gods of science/ pharmaceuticals/ government/ media - the whole evil pantheon. When the earth shakes because of stampede, all you can do is get out of the way and watch the herd thunder by. And you definitely don’t want to join it.
Well, until it's fully approved by the FDA, see ya!
Except the opposite is "common knowledge" for anyone who has studied and done actual experiments in cell and molecular biology.
Our cells are completely full of mRNA at all times. It is the primary path of information and function change in every cell of every lifeform on Earth. If mRNA that has made it to the cytosol modified DNA in any regular fashion life would cease to exist. In fact, life would have never existed in the first place.
It would be like if every software program on your computer was constantly rewriting the information on your hard drive at random. How long would your computer be able to function? Minutes? Seconds? Its virtually exactly the same thing.
Once again you are talking about naturally occurring mRNA. You have no idea how the synthetic mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to get around the normal cell responses in the body.
Since this is a technology that has never been used on humans before, and has resulted in 100% death of test animals in SARS-CoV-1 vaccine studies, prudence would indicate a wait-and-see approach is the best way to maximize one's chances.
See this article for instance: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna/
which says:
Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”
But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”
It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”
What you postulate at the end actually happened to me once. Around a decade ago I got a computer virus that added exactly 1 byte to every file on the PC. The machine was instantly and completely crippled.
Plenty of known side effects though to justify not chancing it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Aa9Q8vUXNW2S/ This is an interview with Dr. Tenpenny. She’s been researching vaccines for 20 years and has put in over 40,000 hours of research into scientific literature. She’s one of the leading doctors delving into the studies. She’s not the only doctor making these claims. These mRNA vaccines have never been used on humans before and were only approved bc it was declared an emergency. In the animal trials, ALL of the animals ended up dying after being reintroduced to garden variety coronavirus. This is not a joke, and I wouldn’t be so quick to write it off as their are doctors out there dedicating their life to look into this.
Agree completely. This is what people don't understand. It's not about the vax now, it's about your body's response later to the virus if you are vaxxed. And few have the info that, as you said, ALL the animals tested in previous attempts at Corona virus vaxxes died. This is why they skipped animal trials with covid and went straight to vaxxing humans. People getting vaxxed are the trials.
I thought dengvaxia used mRNA technology?
There's a good Schill.
Schill, been around long time. Critical thinking, watch, wait, absorb info instead of wild speculation.
Ok. Long-time Schill. You're glowing.
Wow - checked your post history - no contributions - EVER. Useless commenter with nothing to add.
Look at this great one from the Schill
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i48eLDTY/look-at-this-circle-graph--updat/c/
You can boil it all down to a vaccine is a vaccine, But aestrazennica uses DNA as the delivery While pfizer and maderna use mRna While JandJ uses traditional means (no mrna or dna)
So the pathways each vax uses is very different and not the same. Regardless, HCQ and Ivermectin is the only way to go...
Yes .... Yes .... indeed. And I would frankly add, that I also do not trust any prediction by Pharma.
Their animal subjects all died. And can we see the names listed of those having participated in their trials. Or are they as dead as Biden Voters?