If I did take it, it would be the Johnson and Johnson if available. As I understand it, theirs is more traditional, and I haven't caught their guys out advocating for depopulation. Also, the fact that Biden's people seem to be against them indicates that the J and J people at least mean well and aren't out trying to manipulate the world.
Instead of injecting a fatty covered blob containing the gene-altering mRNA instructions, the only difference is the J&J contains a manufactured pseudo-virus, which will attack your cells, and program those cells to activate the same mRNA instructions. It's not very different at all. Certainly not a traditional vaxx in any sense of the word.
Stay away from all COVID vaccines. Take a Vitamin D supplement, 1000% better option. <3
J and J, traditional as in full of abominable things like aborted fetal cells? J and J willingly sold products that they knew caused cancer, like their BABY powder.
It does not contain aborted fetal cells. This is the exact same thing as the "OMG COKE CONTAINS ABORTED FETAL CELLS" rubbish.
In the testing, they use lab created replicated human fetal cell lines. It's an "immortal" cell, that is replicated - the one used in the vaccines is PER.C6. It's from yes - an aborted or miscarried fetus from... 1985 - a collection of cells from a 36-year-long dead fetus.
They replicate the cell-line. The original cells collected act as a blue print for the cell lines in current use.
That absolutely does not mean that the vaccine CONTAINS aborted fetal cells. The cell LINE was used in testing. In a lab setting.
Maybe you object to the fact that a baby died in 1985 or that it was maybe aborted - though no one knows why it was aborted, it was likely a medical reason in 1985 - but the vaccine does.not.contain.aborted.fetal.cells.
The J&J one is an AD26 vector-based vaccine. It has a much safer profile than mRNA ones. mRNA is untested. That is why the J&J one is being slandered so much. There's much to malign with vaccines, however if you want one to be prolific and safely in the community, the J&J one is the best, hands down.
Turn your anger and research towards mRNA vaccines.
They do contain Human DNA from aborted babies that have been rendered immortal, which is why the cell line is listed in the ingredients in the insert, and they have used many more than just two willingly aborted fetuses in the research of vaccines, and there's other cell lines which contain said aborted babies. Go get your cocktail. Vaccines also contain pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brains, dog kidneys, cow hearts, and so forth. Read an insert, or go ahead and find another study that glorifies vaccines.
Still fetal cells. Of course it is replicated. How else do you get millions of cells for a line. A child was aborted. The timing of when the children were aborted matters not.
Using anything with at its origin, products from abortion is morally wrong. It is reprehensible. Made worse that you attempt to defend it.
You know. That makes you (if you knowingly and willfully) guilty.
Thank you. Great explanation of omnipotent stem cell line utilization.
This is actual common useage and science and technology.
Misunderstanding finer points allows all other arguments we have to be dismissed and ridiculed. It’s fine to debate stem cell research purely...but to conflate that argument with the covid injectables makes for a weak argument. We must be a crucible for strong arguments to go forth in the fray.
published on PubMed that has the Conslusion stated as: Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. It is not secret.
I'm not really. Not considering any of the other issues, I am thinking of this on the level of flu shots, and the only time I got those was when I worked in MRDD residential facilities long ago.
Because Trump statement uses quotes at beginning and end of statement, I say Trump is quoting someone and not making a Trump statement. Those do not have quotes.
Good find.
Edit: I’m still not taking this shot.
Nor I.
Nor I
nor I
Nor I.
I am. Oh wait, Nor I.
If I did take it, it would be the Johnson and Johnson if available. As I understand it, theirs is more traditional, and I haven't caught their guys out advocating for depopulation. Also, the fact that Biden's people seem to be against them indicates that the J and J people at least mean well and aren't out trying to manipulate the world.
There's nothing traditional about it, fren...
Instead of injecting a fatty covered blob containing the gene-altering mRNA instructions, the only difference is the J&J contains a manufactured pseudo-virus, which will attack your cells, and program those cells to activate the same mRNA instructions. It's not very different at all. Certainly not a traditional vaxx in any sense of the word.
Stay away from all COVID vaccines. Take a Vitamin D supplement, 1000% better option. <3
J and J, traditional as in full of abominable things like aborted fetal cells? J and J willingly sold products that they knew caused cancer, like their BABY powder.
It does not contain aborted fetal cells. This is the exact same thing as the "OMG COKE CONTAINS ABORTED FETAL CELLS" rubbish.
In the testing, they use lab created replicated human fetal cell lines. It's an "immortal" cell, that is replicated - the one used in the vaccines is PER.C6. It's from yes - an aborted or miscarried fetus from... 1985 - a collection of cells from a 36-year-long dead fetus.
They replicate the cell-line. The original cells collected act as a blue print for the cell lines in current use.
That absolutely does not mean that the vaccine CONTAINS aborted fetal cells. The cell LINE was used in testing. In a lab setting.
Maybe you object to the fact that a baby died in 1985 or that it was maybe aborted - though no one knows why it was aborted, it was likely a medical reason in 1985 - but the vaccine does.not.contain.aborted.fetal.cells.
The J&J one is an AD26 vector-based vaccine. It has a much safer profile than mRNA ones. mRNA is untested. That is why the J&J one is being slandered so much. There's much to malign with vaccines, however if you want one to be prolific and safely in the community, the J&J one is the best, hands down.
Turn your anger and research towards mRNA vaccines.
They do contain Human DNA from aborted babies that have been rendered immortal, which is why the cell line is listed in the ingredients in the insert, and they have used many more than just two willingly aborted fetuses in the research of vaccines, and there's other cell lines which contain said aborted babies. Go get your cocktail. Vaccines also contain pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brains, dog kidneys, cow hearts, and so forth. Read an insert, or go ahead and find another study that glorifies vaccines.
Still fetal cells. Of course it is replicated. How else do you get millions of cells for a line. A child was aborted. The timing of when the children were aborted matters not.
Using anything with at its origin, products from abortion is morally wrong. It is reprehensible. Made worse that you attempt to defend it.
You know. That makes you (if you knowingly and willfully) guilty.
Most importantly, God knows.
Thank you. Great explanation of omnipotent stem cell line utilization.
This is actual common useage and science and technology.
Misunderstanding finer points allows all other arguments we have to be dismissed and ridiculed. It’s fine to debate stem cell research purely...but to conflate that argument with the covid injectables makes for a weak argument. We must be a crucible for strong arguments to go forth in the fray.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103708
published on PubMed that has the Conslusion stated as: Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. It is not secret.
Can you provide evidence that the adenovirus vaccines have a safer profile? All I have seen is just less data.
It’s 99.97% survivable, why on earth would you consider ANY vaccine?
I'm not really. Not considering any of the other issues, I am thinking of this on the level of flu shots, and the only time I got those was when I worked in MRDD residential facilities long ago.
Only time I’ve gotten a flu shot was when forced by the military.
Drop 4245 made POTUS’ statements about the vaccine/OWS make far more sense to me.
“HOW DO YOU TRAP [INSTALL MEDICAL ADVISORS_SKY_IS_FALLING] POTUS INTO ENDORSEMENT OR FACE WW MEDICAL-SCIENCE-MEDIA FULL ASSAULT?”
Because Trump statement uses quotes at beginning and end of statement, I say Trump is quoting someone and not making a Trump statement. Those do not have quotes.