So there was watermarks!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (284)
sorted by:
Ah! But what is it testing for? Is it really for a watermark? To address your comment, if it is for a watermark, my guess is that it will be whole boxes that will fail the test at once.
I just want to know if anyone has actually seen one fail yet. I saw in another thread that they sent one ballot back for review in a flurry of activity, so maybe they have found one. Just getting anxious is all. Waited too long for this, and want to spread some actual hope to my circle of friends who don't watch these boards. I agree that when it strikes, there will likely be hundreds if not thousands.
Wish I knew precisely what it was they were looking for. You'd think they could tell us. What harm could it do now?
well inversely with the amount of fraud we know happened, what if they havent even found a real ballot yet? lol
Yes! I talked about this from the very beginning, and everyone thought it was too far-fetched.
Yes. I don't think Fincham has mentioned they will specifically be looking for watermarks. Maybe it's because this is really a big surprise party? I hope...
I'm hoping during these months of procrastation that the Dems didn't already eliminate the "boxes of bad" ballots.
The fake ballots are hardly Trump votes? So if they removed the fakes before the audit, the Biden votes would be reduced in the same number. It’s a win-win. Either we find fake Biden votes, or the Biden votes will lower after the audit.
I would prefer that we find fake ballots, because then a forensic examination might reveal who printed, distributed and filled them in.
If the dems managed to “burn them in a great barn-fire”, Trump would still win, but it would be harder to prove foul play.
How do you know these aren’t failing? We can’t see close enough really to examine if a watermark is present from this camera view.
There was some noise around the red forensic table a while ago and now in the yellow, 2-3 from staff at the tables
Someone this morning on 4chan posted a screenshot of one of Sidney Powell’s affidavits from a poll worker.
That poll worker said she was challenging ballots with three dark gray water marks as being counterfeit but the supervisor said, “It was just a different printer.” So maybe these really were all rejected.
I wonder too, if they are looking to see if there is a "fold" in the paper ballots.
They would be looking for a lack of creases, yes.