The men of renown as described in the Bible were genetic hybrids of fallen angels and women. They are not redeemable as they are genetically not human. They proceeded to bring about terrible harm to humanity at the time and to the environment. They were giants whom fed on human flesh and bone, and demanded worship from humans.
Their deeds and behaviors have yet to be forgotten to history as they are still known by the unofficial accounting of their actions. You can always look to ancient mythology for a better understanding: Greek mythos, Indian sub-continent mythos, Native American mythos, Chinese mythos, Aztec mythos, Babylonian mythos, Scandinavian mythos, Germanic mythos, Egyptian mythos, etc.
Everywhere you look you can see their memory is still retained as they were exceedingly terrifying and destructive to humans and to the rest of creation. Noah's bloodline being found pure in his generations (genetically unblemished by nephilim dna), was chosen by God to carry forward the torch of humanity.
Did you ever wonder why God was so strict with the Israelites about not mixing with other people's (preserving genetics and bloodlines chosen for the coming savior (Jesus) from a similar attack vector is the answer).
Did you ever wonder why God ordered the Israelites to kill every person and destroy everything of the Canaanites, the Amelakites, and other people groups? The Canaanites were known to be giants, the scripture gives indications that their genetic bloodline in at least some of their people was polluted again by Nephilim, the valuable animals of their people's were also required to be slaughtered for the same reason.
God was not going to allow the Nephilim to simply start again with destroying the creation permanently and irredeemably. They were restrained and where pockets remained, God raised up tribes of people to destroy them. Many groups have such stories of fighting giants that would eat human flesh.
Don't think I'm arguing for some human genetic purity test or something like that. If you are human and your DNA is part of the human genome, then there is no problem. If genetically you have DNA that was somehow altered to be no longer human (science or via fallen angels/ nephilim) then unfortunately you are a hybrid creature not of God's creation and thus the blood of the Lamb would not be extended to cover you.
Does anyone in this world today fall under the hybrid designation? -- I have no idea and will allow God to make that judgement.
Is it possible that someday science will take us past a point of no return with genetic alterations? -- I would say this is very likely to occur within the end times. A Mark of the Beast that is a genetic modification would make allot of sense explaining why those who take the Mark cannot be saved.
Where is this scientific genetic modification line? -- I cannot say for sure. I believe the modification would have to involve synthetic genes that are not found in the naturally occurring genome of humans.
"They are not redeemable as they are genetically not human."
You just explained why the DS are pushing transhumanism and gene manipulation. Christ died in order to redeem God's children (humans) from original sin. But...what if your DNA can no longer be considered truly human? Will you miss out on the gift of redemption? Is this the goal of the satanists -- to strip away our chance of being redeemed by Our Savior?
Wow, is that insidious, or what? It looks like the DS is doing everything possible to keep us from Heaven and turn us into minions of satan. Scary stuff!
They didn't know about DNA, we infer that from our knowledge. Read the Book of Enoch and Book of Jasher for a description of the Nephilim and pre-flood days. They aren't in the canonical Bible themselves although both are mentioned there.
I will add that there is a similar flood story in other oral histories, and within historical times, almost, there was an extinction event, the Young Dryas 12,750 BC, which could well have resulted in world wide flooding.
For those not in the know, both these books mentioned, while maybe not canon, does not mean they were not divinely inspired.
There are many ancient writings not included in the Holy Bible, ask a Catholic if you could look through their Bible sometime, there will be some stuff in there you won't recognize.
Biblical canon is a joke. Christ even referenced Enoch and even if He didn't, God's Word isn't limited to the Bible. Conversely, aside from the Big Ten and red letters, the Bible is an interpretation and not absolute. I think Danzel Washington in Book of Eli said it best: "I've got a Bible. It's a little beat up, but the important parts are all there"
One Lefty told me that Patrick Henry was an atheist. So I read one of tracts. Henry may have been an atheist, but he had a fantastic analysis of the problems of government and the kingship in ancient Israel -- which kings did well, which kings did poorly, and why. Most atheists couldn't even name any of the kings, except the most famous... maybe David and Solomon.
If you have an Android device, Google Play, and I presume the Apple store has it for IOS. Search "apocrypha" to get even more. Many have annoying ads but there are so many you can find a good one.
I'd recommend LA Marzulli's books and videos on this subject if you're genuinely curious about this subject. He does a great job of thoroughly explaining this using biblical as well as non-canonical text.
Also, the book of Enoch is directly quoted in parts of the bible, like in the book of Jude for instance.
If God is as powerful as He claims, they aren't beyond redemption. Personally I think irredeemable falls under pedophile cults and those who refuse to repent. Those who take the jab and subscribe to onlyfans aren't beyond saving.
You incorrectly associate getting the current mRNA vaccination with the type of genetic alteration that would make someone a hybrid human.
I am speaking of God's creation. The fallen angels originally existed in God's presence. They rebelled and made war against God. They were thrown out of heaven. No salvation is offered to them. They are irredeemable. Satan's plan since the creation of man (in God's image), has been to corrupt and destroy that creation by any and all means.
So Eve was tempted and sinned by disobeying God's command (literally the only thing that was not allowed to them in their paradise) and Adam also followed suit enjoining in that sin. Sin broke the relationship of man with God and delivered authority on this earth from man to Satan (powers of the air).
Even this was not enough for Satan as God while declaring the immediate consequences and final judgements that awaited man, also declared the redemption and salvation that would come to restore man to God. Jesus being foretold again threatened Satan's plan to corrupt and destroy God's perfect creation.
So what could Satan do? Yes he continued to tempt and corrupt the now fallen sinful man (and that was easier than ever before to succeed at), but to prevent the Christ from arriving would require the destruction of man itself. Corrupting God's creation into something not human was an obvious choice and should not surprise anyone this would be a strategy. Genetics is only a recent discovery for humans. Fallen angels who witnessed God create our world would already have this information.
The fallen angels brought the nephilim before the flood. Only Noah's family was spared.
God separated a chosen line of people via Abraham and brought about the nation of Israel. He provided them laws that would insure their lineage remained uncorrupted by further attempts to hybrids fallen angels and humans. Israel had no understanding of genetics, but the rules protected them from corruption of their bloodlines.
The reason nephilim are not redeemable is because they come from the line of fallen angels for which no redemption is offered.
Christ died to save humans from our sin and restore us in relationship to God. He did not die to restore fallen angels, and the Bible is clear on the outcome of the fallen angels and demons.
I asked a Chabadic Rabbi about the Nephelim. What were they?
He said there were angels in heaven who told G-d that man was too sinful.
G-d said: "It is because Man is half physical form and half divine essence. The physical form makes it more of a struggle for man to overcome the evil inclination."
The angels responded: "That's nonsense. If we were in human form, we would not be corrupted and we would lead men to virtue."
G-d said: "Okay, we'll see about that."
G-d put these angels into physical bodies, and let them keep their angelic memories so they could try to make good on their claim. They were instantly corrupted.
One Rabbi I listened to online talked about G-d's strict measures. And how some people read it and think it's over the top. But he asks a very sharp question.
Q: What's worse than extremely strict parents who punish you for your infractions, even if they don't seem like a big deal?
A: Parents who don't give a damn and never punish you for anything you do.
I was thinking of this just last night as I said my prayers. I thought, "Wait, God, are you allowing this vaccine/depopulation to happen to rid the world of the evil? Of the non-believers, the heretics, the satanists, the demons? And those of us who put our utter faith and trust in you are spared?" It all made sense to me after that. This is a cleansing that that God is prepared to do. The evil cabal was going to use it for their benefit, but what they ended up doing was only convincing other evil people to take it, but not good people who know the evil of the cabal and aren't afraid to die. Those who aren't afraid to die will be spared, while those who fear death and judgement will die.
What good is the mark if primarily only the wicked are taking it? satan does not enjoy making the wicked do more wicked things. He truly enjoys leading the sheep of Jesus to their corruption and resulting slaughter. That is "profit" for satan.
Exactly, which is why the MSM is so desperate to get us, conservatives, take the vaccine because they realize we're not. They're worried now that WE will be the only ones left, that WE will be in control once all others are gone. They know that and they're terrified of it.
So the Bible says that Noah's family was the only ones left not of the devil's seed. The number 17 is victory over evil in the bible and it's the day if the month the world was flooded or he touch down on dry land. I don't remember which.
I am about to watch Noah's Ark now, I highly recommend. If what you say about 17th day is true, then Q PREDIECTED THIS! haha seriously that would be neat.
I was going to say that Q community has been like an Ark in this turmoil for so many of us...
17 is overcoming evil in bible and here is the fun one. Biblical scholars believe there was a document used by mark and Luke with the sayings if Jesus. They call this document Q. It's all biblical, I means Donald Trump's name means chauffeur.
Russel Crowe one is absolute horseshit and extremely far away from the Bible. Rather full heartedly recommend the Ten Commandments and Ben Hur. Both are old as shit, but both are incredible in scope, amazingly well done and stay true to scripture.
A bastard..mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of the Lord until the 10th generation.
This scripture is NOT talking about illegitimate children, but mixed seed children. That mixed seed that we are never to marry is a "tare"-you will know them by their fruit. Why? Jesus said there is no truth in them.
10 meaning God's authority, goverment. We cannot judge the heart, only God can, but it seems that mixed seed (such as Cain and his offspring) cannot submit to God's authority and cannot hear His voice. Children born over time may be able to if mixed with the "wheat". This is not a racial thing but a spiritual one.
When Q and anons talk about symbols and illuminati you are talking about the tares. That is why these topics should be allowed on the Q board.
These families and their evil started with Cain. That is where the split happened in the generations. There were further splits with the fallen angel offspring. Yes the point is to corrupt flesh man so we cannot hear the voice of God.
What if they reject God, reject light, reject love, reject reason, reject life, reject faith....
But accept the Mark of The Beast.
What does that make them?
They laugh in your face and take the mark, when it could spread to you and make you sterile. What does that make them?
They think a baby being snuffed in the womb is funny or a "right". WHAT DOES THAT MAKE THEM?
Do not blame Trump or Q, they are not God, and even God tests us and gives us FREE WILL and does NOT control EVERYTHING... God flooded the earth, why did he not just magically make the Nephilim go away? Why doesn't god just magically cure the vaccinated next? I don't think God works like that, and I never will. They failed a test it seems.
Hopefully it is not truly the mark of the beast though. I truly hope it is mostly placebos given out, with white hats running fake news about dead vax users to wake more people up... But idk at this point. I am just glad that I AM NOT BEING STRAPPED DOWN AND INJECTED and only THE BRAINWASHED SHEEP are willingly injecting themselves, and effectively removing themsevles from the gene pool. I hope it does not shed, but that is all. I do not feel bad for the monsters who take the injection, thinking it will make them "more human" than me. More acceptable. Allowed outside. NO. THEY CAN ROT. END OF STORY FOR ME.
It's not the Mark of the Beast, trial run yes, but not the big one. The big one will involve what is basically a pledge of allegiance to the Beast, not a deception. They just wanna see if people are willing to take them.
In what way is this injection not a pledge of allegiance to the knowledge of man and temple Vaccina?
God told us not to fear is the injection not acceptance of fear and reliance on man? plausibly the mark, a precursor at the very least. Either way A ten foot pole is called for
G-d message not to fear.... I always think the message is not to be prey to mortal fears.
I heard a story of some Communists, or maybe Nazis, interrogating a Rabbi. They threatened to kill him, and he said: "Go ahead. I'd be delighted to get out of this stupid little room and go to G-d."
It's hard to intimidate someone with that kind of faith.
The mark of the beast will no doubt require some sort of oath
How do you come to this conclusion?
Counter argument. Examples mirrored in exodus show how the mark could be an annual ceremony. Boosters anyone?
“This annual festival will be a visible sign to you, like a mark branded on your hand or your forehead. Let it remind you always to recite this teaching of the Lord: ‘With a strong hand, the Lord rescued you from Egypt.’”
Exodus 13:9 NLT
“This ceremony will be like a mark branded on your hand or your forehead. It is a reminder that the power of the Lord’s mighty hand brought us out of Egypt.””
Exodus 13:16 NLT
I think that God is wise enough to know who is guilty and who is not. I ABSOLUTELY do not think God punishes the innocent when the wicked manipulate them.
Read Saint Irenaeus of Lyon from Second Century of the Christian Era, before the Church Fathers lost their nuts. In The Demonstration of The Apostolic Preaching at about ¶20 he addresses the Flood.
He addresses at length the Curse of Cain and Ham.
The Holy See is vacant SEDEVACANT. Now come to the Oval Office
The vaccinated are. That is not "we". They are also the cocky ones, not "we". careful how you toss "we" around. Speak for yourself. Good luck with your vax too shill.
Be very careful posting about this topic. My post on this subject was deleted by a mod without explanation. Now my entire attitude to Q and the whole 'plan' is taking a different turn. Eye opening ...
Many of us Q supporters aren't Christians. Just letting you know you're amongst a crowd that believes Q but doesn't always agree about the religious stuff thrown in.
Q is human or the product of humans... We don't know about's ahead of us in the great beyond... Many have differeing beliefs and proclaim to be fact. Q could be a Christian or a group of many... Doesn't mean the plan is wrong and it doesn't make Christianity true, IMO.
Once you realize you don't control what you believe in, you'll be far better off for it.
The men of renown as described in the Bible were genetic hybrids of fallen angels and women. They are not redeemable as they are genetically not human. They proceeded to bring about terrible harm to humanity at the time and to the environment. They were giants whom fed on human flesh and bone, and demanded worship from humans.
Their deeds and behaviors have yet to be forgotten to history as they are still known by the unofficial accounting of their actions. You can always look to ancient mythology for a better understanding: Greek mythos, Indian sub-continent mythos, Native American mythos, Chinese mythos, Aztec mythos, Babylonian mythos, Scandinavian mythos, Germanic mythos, Egyptian mythos, etc.
Everywhere you look you can see their memory is still retained as they were exceedingly terrifying and destructive to humans and to the rest of creation. Noah's bloodline being found pure in his generations (genetically unblemished by nephilim dna), was chosen by God to carry forward the torch of humanity.
Did you ever wonder why God was so strict with the Israelites about not mixing with other people's (preserving genetics and bloodlines chosen for the coming savior (Jesus) from a similar attack vector is the answer).
Did you ever wonder why God ordered the Israelites to kill every person and destroy everything of the Canaanites, the Amelakites, and other people groups? The Canaanites were known to be giants, the scripture gives indications that their genetic bloodline in at least some of their people was polluted again by Nephilim, the valuable animals of their people's were also required to be slaughtered for the same reason.
God was not going to allow the Nephilim to simply start again with destroying the creation permanently and irredeemably. They were restrained and where pockets remained, God raised up tribes of people to destroy them. Many groups have such stories of fighting giants that would eat human flesh.
Don't think I'm arguing for some human genetic purity test or something like that. If you are human and your DNA is part of the human genome, then there is no problem. If genetically you have DNA that was somehow altered to be no longer human (science or via fallen angels/ nephilim) then unfortunately you are a hybrid creature not of God's creation and thus the blood of the Lamb would not be extended to cover you.
Does anyone in this world today fall under the hybrid designation? -- I have no idea and will allow God to make that judgement.
Is it possible that someday science will take us past a point of no return with genetic alterations? -- I would say this is very likely to occur within the end times. A Mark of the Beast that is a genetic modification would make allot of sense explaining why those who take the Mark cannot be saved.
Where is this scientific genetic modification line? -- I cannot say for sure. I believe the modification would have to involve synthetic genes that are not found in the naturally occurring genome of humans.
OP, you just hit the nail on the head:
"They are not redeemable as they are genetically not human."
You just explained why the DS are pushing transhumanism and gene manipulation. Christ died in order to redeem God's children (humans) from original sin. But...what if your DNA can no longer be considered truly human? Will you miss out on the gift of redemption? Is this the goal of the satanists -- to strip away our chance of being redeemed by Our Savior?
Wow, is that insidious, or what? It looks like the DS is doing everything possible to keep us from Heaven and turn us into minions of satan. Scary stuff!
Wow. This makes a lot of sense.
Like the MRNA "vaccines?" They change you permanently and your future offspring. I feel there's similarities.
Which bible books is this information contained in?
They didn't know about DNA, we infer that from our knowledge. Read the Book of Enoch and Book of Jasher for a description of the Nephilim and pre-flood days. They aren't in the canonical Bible themselves although both are mentioned there.
I will add that there is a similar flood story in other oral histories, and within historical times, almost, there was an extinction event, the Young Dryas 12,750 BC, which could well have resulted in world wide flooding.
For those not in the know, both these books mentioned, while maybe not canon, does not mean they were not divinely inspired.
There are many ancient writings not included in the Holy Bible, ask a Catholic if you could look through their Bible sometime, there will be some stuff in there you won't recognize.
That doesn't mean it is wrong or bad.
Biblical canon is a joke. Christ even referenced Enoch and even if He didn't, God's Word isn't limited to the Bible. Conversely, aside from the Big Ten and red letters, the Bible is an interpretation and not absolute. I think Danzel Washington in Book of Eli said it best: "I've got a Bible. It's a little beat up, but the important parts are all there"
I believe, it’s my opinion, that the Constitution was Divinely inspired.
One Lefty told me that Patrick Henry was an atheist. So I read one of tracts. Henry may have been an atheist, but he had a fantastic analysis of the problems of government and the kingship in ancient Israel -- which kings did well, which kings did poorly, and why. Most atheists couldn't even name any of the kings, except the most famous... maybe David and Solomon.
Paul was an unbeliever and look what God did with him ☺️
There is a book of Enoch? Oooo How does one good about finding these. You have peaked my interest.
Search for Michael Heiser on YouTube. He is a scholar who explains these things clearly to a lay audience.
Thank you for the suggestion to get me started
Thank you.
If you have an Android device, Google Play, and I presume the Apple store has it for IOS. Search "apocrypha" to get even more. Many have annoying ads but there are so many you can find a good one.
Thanks for the keyword and suggestion
You can order it on Amazon and find recorded versions on youtube.
I'd recommend LA Marzulli's books and videos on this subject if you're genuinely curious about this subject. He does a great job of thoroughly explaining this using biblical as well as non-canonical text.
Also, the book of Enoch is directly quoted in parts of the bible, like in the book of Jude for instance.
If God is as powerful as He claims, they aren't beyond redemption. Personally I think irredeemable falls under pedophile cults and those who refuse to repent. Those who take the jab and subscribe to onlyfans aren't beyond saving.
You incorrectly associate getting the current mRNA vaccination with the type of genetic alteration that would make someone a hybrid human.
I am speaking of God's creation. The fallen angels originally existed in God's presence. They rebelled and made war against God. They were thrown out of heaven. No salvation is offered to them. They are irredeemable. Satan's plan since the creation of man (in God's image), has been to corrupt and destroy that creation by any and all means.
So Eve was tempted and sinned by disobeying God's command (literally the only thing that was not allowed to them in their paradise) and Adam also followed suit enjoining in that sin. Sin broke the relationship of man with God and delivered authority on this earth from man to Satan (powers of the air).
Even this was not enough for Satan as God while declaring the immediate consequences and final judgements that awaited man, also declared the redemption and salvation that would come to restore man to God. Jesus being foretold again threatened Satan's plan to corrupt and destroy God's perfect creation.
So what could Satan do? Yes he continued to tempt and corrupt the now fallen sinful man (and that was easier than ever before to succeed at), but to prevent the Christ from arriving would require the destruction of man itself. Corrupting God's creation into something not human was an obvious choice and should not surprise anyone this would be a strategy. Genetics is only a recent discovery for humans. Fallen angels who witnessed God create our world would already have this information.
The fallen angels brought the nephilim before the flood. Only Noah's family was spared.
God separated a chosen line of people via Abraham and brought about the nation of Israel. He provided them laws that would insure their lineage remained uncorrupted by further attempts to hybrids fallen angels and humans. Israel had no understanding of genetics, but the rules protected them from corruption of their bloodlines.
The reason nephilim are not redeemable is because they come from the line of fallen angels for which no redemption is offered.
Christ died to save humans from our sin and restore us in relationship to God. He did not die to restore fallen angels, and the Bible is clear on the outcome of the fallen angels and demons.
Repentance is a requirement.
Heathen
I asked a Chabadic Rabbi about the Nephelim. What were they?
He said there were angels in heaven who told G-d that man was too sinful.
G-d said: "It is because Man is half physical form and half divine essence. The physical form makes it more of a struggle for man to overcome the evil inclination."
The angels responded: "That's nonsense. If we were in human form, we would not be corrupted and we would lead men to virtue."
G-d said: "Okay, we'll see about that."
G-d put these angels into physical bodies, and let them keep their angelic memories so they could try to make good on their claim. They were instantly corrupted.
Interesting. Thanks for sharing that perspective.
God seems to be very into "Okay, we'll see about that."
Learning the hard way sure isn't fun. But it's definitely taught me a lot.
?
One Rabbi I listened to online talked about G-d's strict measures. And how some people read it and think it's over the top. But he asks a very sharp question.
Q: What's worse than extremely strict parents who punish you for your infractions, even if they don't seem like a big deal?
A: Parents who don't give a damn and never punish you for anything you do.
It's amazing how simple the best advice always turns out to be. Thanks, as always, for your take. I appreciate your perspective. Shalom.
Everyone called Noah a conspiracy theorist, then it started to rain.
I was thinking of this just last night as I said my prayers. I thought, "Wait, God, are you allowing this vaccine/depopulation to happen to rid the world of the evil? Of the non-believers, the heretics, the satanists, the demons? And those of us who put our utter faith and trust in you are spared?" It all made sense to me after that. This is a cleansing that that God is prepared to do. The evil cabal was going to use it for their benefit, but what they ended up doing was only convincing other evil people to take it, but not good people who know the evil of the cabal and aren't afraid to die. Those who aren't afraid to die will be spared, while those who fear death and judgement will die.
You and me think almost identical on this issue.
What good is the mark if primarily only the wicked are taking it? satan does not enjoy making the wicked do more wicked things. He truly enjoys leading the sheep of Jesus to their corruption and resulting slaughter. That is "profit" for satan.
Exactly, which is why the MSM is so desperate to get us, conservatives, take the vaccine because they realize we're not. They're worried now that WE will be the only ones left, that WE will be in control once all others are gone. They know that and they're terrified of it.
The meek will inherit the earth.
Amen!
So the Bible says that Noah's family was the only ones left not of the devil's seed. The number 17 is victory over evil in the bible and it's the day if the month the world was flooded or he touch down on dry land. I don't remember which.
I am about to watch Noah's Ark now, I highly recommend. If what you say about 17th day is true, then Q PREDIECTED THIS! haha seriously that would be neat.
I was going to say that Q community has been like an Ark in this turmoil for so many of us...
Truth.
17 is overcoming evil in bible and here is the fun one. Biblical scholars believe there was a document used by mark and Luke with the sayings if Jesus. They call this document Q. It's all biblical, I means Donald Trump's name means chauffeur.
Chauffeur?
Yeah, like the limo driver. The guy who brings people to Jesus. "We're gonna need some help from the big man up stairs." Donald Trump
Agree? God bless Trump?
Russel Crowe one is absolute horseshit and extremely far away from the Bible. Rather full heartedly recommend the Ten Commandments and Ben Hur. Both are old as shit, but both are incredible in scope, amazingly well done and stay true to scripture.
Thank you. Will dl now.
I will be watching Ten Commandments today, thank you.
Agreed, maybe passion of the Christ sequel will be good, but until then, it is pre-90's biblical films only.
https://archive.org/details/TheTenCommandments_201407
Greatest Heroess of the Bible The Story of Noah
When I was a wide-eyed child, Noah was a cute story with animals.
When I was an atheistic teenager, Noah was a story as to how psychotic G-d is, willing to wipe out the entire world.
When I became a religious adult, I wonder now: Why did G-d spare Noah?
A bastard..mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of the Lord until the 10th generation.
This scripture is NOT talking about illegitimate children, but mixed seed children. That mixed seed that we are never to marry is a "tare"-you will know them by their fruit. Why? Jesus said there is no truth in them.
10 meaning God's authority, goverment. We cannot judge the heart, only God can, but it seems that mixed seed (such as Cain and his offspring) cannot submit to God's authority and cannot hear His voice. Children born over time may be able to if mixed with the "wheat". This is not a racial thing but a spiritual one.
When Q and anons talk about symbols and illuminati you are talking about the tares. That is why these topics should be allowed on the Q board.
These families and their evil started with Cain. That is where the split happened in the generations. There were further splits with the fallen angel offspring. Yes the point is to corrupt flesh man so we cannot hear the voice of God.
What if they reject God, reject light, reject love, reject reason, reject life, reject faith....
But accept the Mark of The Beast.
What does that make them?
They laugh in your face and take the mark, when it could spread to you and make you sterile. What does that make them?
They think a baby being snuffed in the womb is funny or a "right". WHAT DOES THAT MAKE THEM?
Do not blame Trump or Q, they are not God, and even God tests us and gives us FREE WILL and does NOT control EVERYTHING... God flooded the earth, why did he not just magically make the Nephilim go away? Why doesn't god just magically cure the vaccinated next? I don't think God works like that, and I never will. They failed a test it seems.
Hopefully it is not truly the mark of the beast though. I truly hope it is mostly placebos given out, with white hats running fake news about dead vax users to wake more people up... But idk at this point. I am just glad that I AM NOT BEING STRAPPED DOWN AND INJECTED and only THE BRAINWASHED SHEEP are willingly injecting themselves, and effectively removing themsevles from the gene pool. I hope it does not shed, but that is all. I do not feel bad for the monsters who take the injection, thinking it will make them "more human" than me. More acceptable. Allowed outside. NO. THEY CAN ROT. END OF STORY FOR ME.
It's not the Mark of the Beast, trial run yes, but not the big one. The big one will involve what is basically a pledge of allegiance to the Beast, not a deception. They just wanna see if people are willing to take them.
In what way is this injection not a pledge of allegiance to the knowledge of man and temple Vaccina?
God told us not to fear is the injection not acceptance of fear and reliance on man? plausibly the mark, a precursor at the very least. Either way A ten foot pole is called for
G-d message not to fear.... I always think the message is not to be prey to mortal fears.
I heard a story of some Communists, or maybe Nazis, interrogating a Rabbi. They threatened to kill him, and he said: "Go ahead. I'd be delighted to get out of this stupid little room and go to G-d."
It's hard to intimidate someone with that kind of faith.
The amount of deception involved. The mark of the beast will no doubt require some sort of oath. It will be a conscious decision.
Counter argument. Examples mirrored in exodus show how the mark could be an annual ceremony. Boosters anyone?
“This annual festival will be a visible sign to you, like a mark branded on your hand or your forehead. Let it remind you always to recite this teaching of the Lord: ‘With a strong hand, the Lord rescued you from Egypt.’” Exodus 13:9 NLT
“This ceremony will be like a mark branded on your hand or your forehead. It is a reminder that the power of the Lord’s mighty hand brought us out of Egypt.”” Exodus 13:16 NLT
Think mirror Exodus 13: 9-17 Revelation 13:9-17
Yes
I disagree.
I know a family with two high school students (minors) and mama has decreed they will all get the shot.
One kid doesn't want it but mama is insisting.
Do you dismiss the kid if he doesn't disobey his parent?
Also, I've politely forwarded relevant info to the mother, to no avail.
I think that God is wise enough to know who is guilty and who is not. I ABSOLUTELY do not think God punishes the innocent when the wicked manipulate them.
Read Saint Irenaeus of Lyon from Second Century of the Christian Era, before the Church Fathers lost their nuts. In The Demonstration of The Apostolic Preaching at about ¶20 he addresses the Flood.
He addresses at length the Curse of Cain and Ham.
The Holy See is vacant SEDEVACANT. Now come to the Oval Office
Chuck Missler talks about Nephilim, Enoch, the flood.
https://youtu.be/0syohVIkDHc?t=1067
The vaccinated are. That is not "we". They are also the cocky ones, not "we". careful how you toss "we" around. Speak for yourself. Good luck with your vax too shill.
This belongs in c/Christianity.
Also
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/92/dd/96/92dd96218579ef9fe169c5bda7a8df62.jpg
You belong on reddit you heathen
?
Be very careful posting about this topic. My post on this subject was deleted by a mod without explanation. Now my entire attitude to Q and the whole 'plan' is taking a different turn. Eye opening ...
how do the two relate? i was deleted, now I don't trust Q?
Many of us Q supporters aren't Christians. Just letting you know you're amongst a crowd that believes Q but doesn't always agree about the religious stuff thrown in.
A shame, does Q not talk of Vaccines and includes Bible verses in posts?
Q is human or the product of humans... We don't know about's ahead of us in the great beyond... Many have differeing beliefs and proclaim to be fact. Q could be a Christian or a group of many... Doesn't mean the plan is wrong and it doesn't make Christianity true, IMO.
Once you realize you don't control what you believe in, you'll be far better off for it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNnVtkhx/the-place-is-compd-they-delete-l/
What did you say that got it deleted? My post is not sugar coating it at all, the mods did not ban it.
ty, I saw his Qanon fantasy post before. I know he's a shill.
This topic, The Flood, belongs in c/Christianity.
Agreed.
It is an analogy. You belong in reddit you heathen.