Ehh. I would be careful. Some of his material is fantastic. But he also beleives there is some weird galactic federation and we are living in a star wars type area. Not exactly what Q has said at all... He also Thinks trump won't be back until 2024 which I think is complete BS.
Use discernment then. I don't know what to make of his MJ12 talk, so I don't pay much attention to it. The connections he has made regarding the Law of War manual, however, are undeniable.
You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?
The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.
You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:
Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own. In fact, they ingested far less sugar, preservatives, vaccines/meds, and other toxic substances, and experienced far less electromagnetic radiation than we do.
Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.
You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.
We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.
You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?
You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?
Why haven't we returned to the moon?
The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.
Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.
You are not quite understanding gravity - all objects with mass have gravity between them proportional to their mass.
A flat earth would still exhibit gravity, because it would still have mass. So your bullet would still arc toward the ground, just as is the case on the ball-earth.
The ball earth spins however so the landing site of the bullet would appear to be to the left or right of the spot the gunner expects when the shot is fired, this is the coriolis effect you mentioned - it is caused by the spin, not gravity. Of course the bullet travels in a straight line as viewed from above in isolation, but this would look like a curve if you plotted the path on the surface of the earth, because the earth is spinning.
A flar earth could spin also of course, but the earth is not flat, because if it were the same stars would be visible from Australia and Britain, it would also be night/day time at all locations on the earth simultaneously, which it never is)
Ok, so he thinks Trump won't be back until 2024, and that is complete BS? What evidence do you have to support your assertion that his prediction is false? Btw, until trump comes back, there is none.
Also, you can believe different things and assign different percentages of reasonable probability to them. If you are unable to ponder 2 or more competing ideas without having to pick up a spear and fight to the death to defend one of them then you are incapable of critical thinking, and should steer clear of casting judgement on someone's statement of what they think is going on.
There's a lot of support for the whole galactic federation thing, admittedly the most outlandish, I think there is far more support for the firmament/multiple dimensions/aliens are actually demons/angels lost technology stuff but that is the former second-most outlandish idea, and it doesn't exclude galactic beings that can teleport through the firmament. The problem is the impenetrable firmament, the requirement for portals to travel through "space," and the lost tech keep being made more likely through the release of scientific papers and decades of quantum research and taboo archaeology.
Flat earth is Satanic. The bible says earth is Satan's realm and those who say we cannot leave earth are in essence saying we can never be with God in the heavens (firmament).
Ehh. I would be careful. Some of his material is fantastic. But he also beleives there is some weird galactic federation and we are living in a star wars type area. Not exactly what Q has said at all... He also Thinks trump won't be back until 2024 which I think is complete BS.
Use discernment then. I don't know what to make of his MJ12 talk, so I don't pay much attention to it. The connections he has made regarding the Law of War manual, however, are undeniable.
Absolutely. I find I have to do that with every source. Take bits and pieces from each one.
I have no idea what shape the earth is or if it even has a shape.
But I do know pulling a trigger on a gun does not magically impart scientific secrets onto the shooter.
PROOF:
I have fired many weapons and I am still dumbest mother trucker in a 500 mile range.
You realise your statement is tautological and meaningless in an actual debate?
The Coriolis Effect presupposes the Earth is more or less a sphere.
You are trying to maintain a normalcy bias in a time that is not normal. I, too, do not want to say the Earth is flat, but fella, it's looking like more and more of a possibility every day. The fundamental mistake Evolutionists make is to assume ancient man was stupid. There are two reasons why this doesn't make sense:
Species evolve over MILLIONS of years, if evolution is correct, due to random mutation. As such, there is no way humans of a few thousand years ago had a diminished intellect when compared to our own. In fact, they ingested far less sugar, preservatives, vaccines/meds, and other toxic substances, and experienced far less electromagnetic radiation than we do.
Methods and materials show that ancient humans had technology that surpasses even what we are capable of today.
You can keep defending the conclusion, and presuppose you are already right, or you can evaluate evidence and pretend you may be wrong.
We have pyramids that we either could not build for lack of technology, or lack of surplus resources/time/labor, we have concrete used in ancient times that we didn't start using until the 1900's, we have a fort in Florida that is composed of millions of bricks that had to be transported by boats that did not exist in the 16/17/18th centuries. We have precisely cut edges on humongous rock, placed within other rock, with a weight that we can't even lift today (50 cruise ships worth of weight - we drydock ONE cruise ship to build it, and then flood it to lift it back up). Cocaine and tobacco residue on mummies, Egyptian artifacts dug up in the Americas, pyramids EVERYWHERE, ancient holes bored in granite, holes the diameter of needles bored in jewelry and other stone items, pots bored out from the outside in, and glassware, all produced by ancient human beings. The maps and descriptions of the Earth, from then on, and for another several millennia, all show the Earth as flat. The flag of the UN shows the Earth is flat, maps showed a flat Earth until when? No one is allowed to go to Antarctica, a Navy admiral goes and returns with an insane story (a...Navy....admiral.............admiral). Said admiral returned to state there was a land mass the size of North America past the ice wall. Occult knowledge of flat earth, preserved via manuscripts, images, and secret accounts/ritual. Buzz Aldrin even said we never went to the moon, Obama said we hope to one day be able to travel past low earth orbit.
You think Werner von Braun, an ex-Nazi, had such a well-developed and futuristically sarcastic sense of humor so as to "troll" the world on his own tombstone?
You haven't seen the footage of NASA setting up a false shot of Earth through a porticulis in a low-earth orbit vehicle? Or the astronauts being held up by wires? Or the air bubbles in space?
Why haven't we returned to the moon?
The Coriolis Effect (which is also a debunked line of crap) PRESUPPOSES your conclusion, which you also use as the primary SUPPORT of the same conclusion. It's a fallacy.
Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.
I'm waiting for the response to this @PaineThomas <popcorn>
If ghost ezra's is bright, it means sometimes he makes false statements.
You are not quite understanding gravity - all objects with mass have gravity between them proportional to their mass. A flat earth would still exhibit gravity, because it would still have mass. So your bullet would still arc toward the ground, just as is the case on the ball-earth. The ball earth spins however so the landing site of the bullet would appear to be to the left or right of the spot the gunner expects when the shot is fired, this is the coriolis effect you mentioned - it is caused by the spin, not gravity. Of course the bullet travels in a straight line as viewed from above in isolation, but this would look like a curve if you plotted the path on the surface of the earth, because the earth is spinning.
A flar earth could spin also of course, but the earth is not flat, because if it were the same stars would be visible from Australia and Britain, it would also be night/day time at all locations on the earth simultaneously, which it never is)
This is bigger than Trump. Trump was the trap for the DS. He may or may not come back, but regardless the military will take over. Good things coming.
any of the decent popular people have some crazy that turns people away. like flat earth, or legit lizard people rantings.
they either beleive that stuff or do it to stay up
Ok, so he thinks Trump won't be back until 2024, and that is complete BS? What evidence do you have to support your assertion that his prediction is false? Btw, until trump comes back, there is none.
Also, you can believe different things and assign different percentages of reasonable probability to them. If you are unable to ponder 2 or more competing ideas without having to pick up a spear and fight to the death to defend one of them then you are incapable of critical thinking, and should steer clear of casting judgement on someone's statement of what they think is going on.
There's a lot of support for the whole galactic federation thing, admittedly the most outlandish, I think there is far more support for the firmament/multiple dimensions/aliens are actually demons/angels lost technology stuff but that is the former second-most outlandish idea, and it doesn't exclude galactic beings that can teleport through the firmament. The problem is the impenetrable firmament, the requirement for portals to travel through "space," and the lost tech keep being made more likely through the release of scientific papers and decades of quantum research and taboo archaeology.
Flat earth is Satanic. The bible says earth is Satan's realm and those who say we cannot leave earth are in essence saying we can never be with God in the heavens (firmament).
But we also must recognize that spiritual realms are discussed within. We cannot physically leave earth, it doesn't say our spirit cannot escape.
Satanists say we cannot leave earth.