I've seen lots of posts about the first arrest shocking the world being posed as a Q drop. This is simply not the case. Q never said this and I think it's important to keep the drops succinct and accurate so as not to falsely shape any Anons beliefs or expectations. This is a PSA, not an admonishment.
Link to drops in comments.
Its a damn straight needed PSA tho. THANKS GA Peach-Patriot. Ive tried to tell them too.
STOP THE MADNESS with this LIE.
Q also said in the same posts:
and then said:
These are not necessarily the same people. The first indictment does not have to be the same person as the first arrest. In fact, I think stating them as two separate things like that might have been a purposeful indication that they are not the same people.
This was about Maxwell. Her indictment and arrest was one of the very first ones to get unsealed.
This post also had "Marker [9]"
[9] weeks after that post, Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested.
Veriified action.
Future direction --> What happens when she sings?
Note the date of her trial.
Perhaps. But her indictment did not cause any sort of awakening at all. The Epstein arrest caused more of one.
What significance does Nov 29 have?
Again, Q never promised an awakening with the first arrest, as OP says.
The result of her singing will likely be on full display during her trial.
I wondered about the Marker [9]. Future direction postponed from July to November.
Perhaps then when anons say inaccurately: "First arrest will shock the world", they mean the first indictment unsealing will shock the world.
Any chance the first arrest has already happened?
I think that is very likely. The sentence about the indictment implies a public component (communication). The sentence about the arrest does not suggest anything public at all.
The "first indictment unsealing will shock the world" is also wrong. That was never said. It's very important to not mix and match the wording of different sentences. It confuses the meaning of what is obviously two different ideas.
"First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening."
and
"Truth will shock the world"
These are not tied in any obvious way.
Nor are they tied directly to
"First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction."
"Unseal" suggests public awareness. Such a sphere is reaffirmed in "trigger mass pop awakening". This will be the event that will signify the beginning of the final act in this play (imo).
"Truth will shock the world" is self-evident. The context in which they were originally stated was about familial relationships with current world leaders and Adolf Hitler in one case, and media narratives in another. However, that context is not necessarily the only way it was meant, and as I said, given our own research, such a statement is undeniable, almost trite.
While they can be joined loosely together with the first arrest (especially the first indictment), none of these have anything to do with each other in any explicit or implicit way. "Mass pop awakening" and "shock the world" are not the same idea. One is an awakening and one is shock. People act very different when they have an epiphany and when they are in shock. One can cause the other, but shock is not the only possible reaction to epiphany and they should not be conflated imo.
Now my nit-pick is on.
Since we are clarifying, the climax in a play almost NEVER takes place in the final act. First Act sets the stage: introduces the setting, the principles, and generally sets up the main plot. Second act is rising action, 3rd is climax, 4th resolution.
3 act plays combine the rising action and climax in the second act, but this isnt that kind of play.
We are currently in the second act.
Thank you for clarifying that so carefully.
High zoot post, Slyver.
Have a great day.
There is a succinct truth in that reply.
I do not think so. I believe the first arrest will be very public. I believe the arrest will be George Floyd. Read post 529. ;) kek
https://qalerts.app/?n=529
Wow. This is the first time I've seen a Q post possibly connected to George Floyd. And what chaos we fell into over that one! Not sure how his arrest confirmed future direction, though. Could it be George Bush, instead?
That would undermine a narrative!
That would be insane! Would also be insane if 529=5/29?
Q basically confirmed first arrest was Maxwell
https://greatawakening.win/p/12ighZJlFU/x/c/4E0y02HGd5F
Most people have no clue who that is, but would confirm direction.
Probability: possible.
Makes sense. Piggybacking on your assessment, the indictment can be for more than one person and for multiple crimes. Clinton Foundation comes to mind.
And, with Q, everything has purpose and meaning.
Anon tweeted "Listen: “Half the people involved in the Russian investigation are going to jail.”
Then Q replied: The bottom half was instructed (99% good). The first will send a shock wave.
Lie?? Are you sure it's malicious like that? Could you explain what the big deal is, why the upset over this? Seems like a tiny misunderstanding being blown up into a mountainous issue.
What's the crucial difference between the first arrest shocking the world and the truth [i.e., the truth surrounding that arrest] shocking the world?
Well the point I'm making is about misquoting Q drops. Interpretation of properly quoted drops is another thing entirely. The first arrest may very well be shocking but I tend to think that the information that comes from that arrest will be even more so. After all, when does a bird sing?