That's not what I meant. Obviously a court can recognize that fraud happened and must be fixed. But the courts have no precedent for how to fix presidential election fraud, nor have they ever mandated congress (or the electoral college) to take action. They have invalidated past actions, but they can't force congress to introduce a bill or to reconvene.
This is like a situation where a chauffeur takes a groom the wrong way, and he gets a flat tire in the desert instead of arriving at his wedding, and the girl marries someone else in the meantime. A court can rule anything they want to, but reversing time or forcing guests, the priest and the bride to reconvene is simply beyond their power. And some things cannot be undone. The courts have no existing remedy, no matter what they determine.
Just one more reason why the military is the only way to fix our national election hangover. (The Hangover is a really funny stupid movie, by the way, if you haven't seen it.) I'm sure we'll get there, but also pretty sure that it hasn't been done before.
No it doesn't. Those have to be handled separately.
But rumors are that a successful transparent audit will get you a 17% discount at lucky gunner, some local tar and feather suppliers, AND at my pillow.com!
We're in uncharted waters as far as I can tell. That's why we need to play it smart. We need to do what's best for America. Anything that we do to sleight the Dems or get one over on them can just as easily be used against us.
Personally I think that if a convincing amount of evidence is found and presented to Congress and the SCOTUS rule definitively we should just rerun the Presidential election during the next round of congressional elections. That way a portion of the government is fresh. Unless there is something already in the Constitution that allows us to over turn an election already. When it comes to that the Constitutional conservative method would live by the Jefferson quote, "When government becomes destructive of those ends..."
All that being said. I doubt that Congress would do that. I also think the issue of Congress fabricating evidence to install their or candidate could arise. Rerunning an election and having the people exercise that right again would prevent that though. They would almost always vote for who they thought deserved the Presidency and their allegiance.
We would also have to pass an amendment to the Constitution. To do that which defeats the point of being a conservative. For us I think the best thing to do would be to stall Biden's agenda (any means necessary), Red wave in 2022, pass sound policy that America wants and needs and then take 2024. That would be the conservative method.
HOWEVER, our situation is genuinely dire. The country may not make it to 2024. We all know Biden is a Chinese puppet. Reform maybe in order to avert national security disasters. There are constitutionally conservative methods of reform. That's why amendments exists. There has been one way since the beginning of the country to amend the Constitution. I would argue that a conservative reformer (as oxymoronic as that may sound) would amend the Constitution ONLY in a time of crisis AND would only amend it to make the constitution work better functionally or administratively to serve the STATES of America and it's people and not a political party or it's corporate donors.
Wasn't there some indication that where the vote in a state is overturned, that that states electors can be decertified thereby removing them from the total electoral count that Biden received.
I know what you asking though. Even if the state elections are decertified, this still does not remove Biden. It's like when Al Frakin beat his Republican opponent and it was discovered later that he cheated, he did not get removed from office.
If trump can get enough leverage because of fraud evidence then he can force kamala harris to resign, biden to appoint him vp, congress to approve the appointment and then joe biden resigns...
Yes. SCOTUS ruled on this
Which ruling was that?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61
UNITED STATES v. THROCKMORTON.
That's not what I meant. Obviously a court can recognize that fraud happened and must be fixed. But the courts have no precedent for how to fix presidential election fraud, nor have they ever mandated congress (or the electoral college) to take action. They have invalidated past actions, but they can't force congress to introduce a bill or to reconvene.
This is like a situation where a chauffeur takes a groom the wrong way, and he gets a flat tire in the desert instead of arriving at his wedding, and the girl marries someone else in the meantime. A court can rule anything they want to, but reversing time or forcing guests, the priest and the bride to reconvene is simply beyond their power. And some things cannot be undone. The courts have no existing remedy, no matter what they determine.
Just one more reason why the military is the only way to fix our national election hangover. (The Hangover is a really funny stupid movie, by the way, if you haven't seen it.) I'm sure we'll get there, but also pretty sure that it hasn't been done before.
No it doesn't. Those have to be handled separately.
But rumors are that a successful transparent audit will get you a 17% discount at lucky gunner, some local tar and feather suppliers, AND at my pillow.com!
Couldn't resist.
Let's talk about our health.
We're in uncharted waters as far as I can tell. That's why we need to play it smart. We need to do what's best for America. Anything that we do to sleight the Dems or get one over on them can just as easily be used against us.
Personally I think that if a convincing amount of evidence is found and presented to Congress and the SCOTUS rule definitively we should just rerun the Presidential election during the next round of congressional elections. That way a portion of the government is fresh. Unless there is something already in the Constitution that allows us to over turn an election already. When it comes to that the Constitutional conservative method would live by the Jefferson quote, "When government becomes destructive of those ends..."
All that being said. I doubt that Congress would do that. I also think the issue of Congress fabricating evidence to install their or candidate could arise. Rerunning an election and having the people exercise that right again would prevent that though. They would almost always vote for who they thought deserved the Presidency and their allegiance.
We would also have to pass an amendment to the Constitution. To do that which defeats the point of being a conservative. For us I think the best thing to do would be to stall Biden's agenda (any means necessary), Red wave in 2022, pass sound policy that America wants and needs and then take 2024. That would be the conservative method.
HOWEVER, our situation is genuinely dire. The country may not make it to 2024. We all know Biden is a Chinese puppet. Reform maybe in order to avert national security disasters. There are constitutionally conservative methods of reform. That's why amendments exists. There has been one way since the beginning of the country to amend the Constitution. I would argue that a conservative reformer (as oxymoronic as that may sound) would amend the Constitution ONLY in a time of crisis AND would only amend it to make the constitution work better functionally or administratively to serve the STATES of America and it's people and not a political party or it's corporate donors.
Wasn't there some indication that where the vote in a state is overturned, that that states electors can be decertified thereby removing them from the total electoral count that Biden received.
I know what you asking though. Even if the state elections are decertified, this still does not remove Biden. It's like when Al Frakin beat his Republican opponent and it was discovered later that he cheated, he did not get removed from office.
If trump can get enough leverage because of fraud evidence then he can force kamala harris to resign, biden to appoint him vp, congress to approve the appointment and then joe biden resigns...
No. The basic legal concept that applies is very simple. Fraud vitiates everything. Try to keep that in mind.
Is Biden a DJ in Vegas?