The previous three posts have covered some considerations for where we are today. The Federal Government has failed and become corrupt at all levels and Trump intentionally went about establishing the States as superior to the Federal Government during the Covid "scandemic".
But a question was posed in the last post that will lead into this one: What do we do when ALL branches of our government have turned against the very people they serve?
Are we really to believe the Feds are responsible for making sure the Feds play by the rules? Think about that for a moment. The Federal Government has convinced many Americans they are responsible for making sure they behave and don't violate law. But we've seen how that has turned out. In fact, this has become the primary source of frustration for most Americans that has resulted in our two-tier justice system.
Most of us understand that the Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment for this purpose. But that was meant to be the very last resort. Sure, it is still an option available to Americans but I believe it will not come to that.
Let's start with these important questions:
- Where does the Federal Government derive it's powers from?
- What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
Let's address the first question. Which brings us to an important part of this post - the Constitutional Compact. Today, this is referred to as Compact Theory - because just like conspiracy theory, the powers that be want to divert from the real truth.
Within the first twenty years of our nation, this had already reached the level of the Supreme Court. The Constitution was said to be a compact (i.e., contract) between the Federal Government and the States. However, the Supreme Court ruled and upheld on a few other occasions, that this was a contract between the citizens of the US and the Federal Government because of the phrase "We The People". They opined that because the states were representatives of the people, then it was the people that gave those powers to the Feds. In 1798, this became the first stone in the Feds seizing control.
Thomas Jefferson, one of the men who helped form and ratify the Constitution, infamously opposed this ruling as he was well aware of the intent of the Constitution. One has only look to the Tenth Amendment to see it conflicts with the Supreme Court ruling. In addition, many involved in the process (38 state representative delegates) noted the US Constitution was an improved version of the Articles of Confederation - which to that point treated the states as separate, sovereign nations.
It was not the People who ratified the US Constitution by vote, it was the States. The States wrote and drafted the US Constitution so all citizens would have the same basic rights and freedoms. Note that the Constitution does not say the powers not given to the Feds are given to the People. The tenth Amendment says the powers not given to the Feds are the sole authority of the States.
What would happen if you or I entered into a contract with someone and they didn't uphold their contractual duty. Would you be expected to uphold yours? We know the answer is no. What if they didn't and still decided to take you to court to uphold yours? You would expect the court to find the contract null and void. But what if the court happened to be in the employ of the party that violated the contract?
Isn't that what we have with the Federal Government today. Just since the beginning of 2020, we could all list dozens of Constitutional Violations and far-overstepping their delegated powers. They do this only because the courts are in their corner and they are free to violate their side of the contract while telling others they are held to it. This is how insane it has become.
But that leads us to the second question - What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
The very simple answer to this question is the States. Yes, we all feel like the government has all the power and that is why they can do what they want. But do they?
The Government of course will point to the anti-secession pact that Lincoln forced on the States after the war. All states except Texas are bound by this clause. However, to the earlier point, what happens when one party has continually violated their contract? Why are the States being told they are bound when the Feds feel they are not?
What happens when the States wake up and realize they actually hold all the power and the Federal Government has none? What happens when they realize what that truly means?
Why this all is important is you may have noticed after the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case regarding the election, the States began to take control again. For too long, they lazily seceded authority to the Federal Government that it did not have. You see, not only did Trump instill Patriotism and hope for our country back into many of it's citizens - he also began teaching the states that they, not the Feds, are the superior government in our nation.
It may be a coincidence, but do you find it unusual that Trump now lives in Florida and the Governor most standing up to the Federal tyranny today is Gov. DeSantis of Florida?
States are now passing laws that directly forbid certain Federal Laws from being upheld in their states. You are hearing about Second Amendment sanctuaries. You are seeing them passing laws forbidding abortion - because this was NEVER a power given to the Federal Government.
In Part V, we'll discuss the end game and why understanding all this was so important for it to happen. Our Founding Fathers were smart men who realized what it could do to a nation should it's government became so corrupt, and against the basic rights provided by our Creator, that it had to be cast off.
And they structured the US for just this moment that will be coming.
I will leave you with one final thought before posting Part V tomorrow. Going back to the excerpt posted in part one from the Declaration of Independence - Do Americans even believe they NEED a Federal Government anymore? What would America look like if the Federal Government didn't even exist and instead there existed a compact between the States? Most Importantly, how would you go about dissolving the ENTIRE Federal Government?
Previous posts in the series for reference:
Part I: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0IsGiS/the-end-is-coming--part-i-the-pi/
Part II: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0NQ8JN/the-end-is-coming--part-ii-a-sto/
Part III: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0Rwc89/the-end-is-coming--part-iii-stor/
Eliminating the Federal government and breaking the structure and function of the Constitution is revolution and a bad idea. Federal Government and State Governments as designed by our Founders are both needed for checks and balances. And it works well for free people within a moral / ethical culture. You suggest that we do away with our Constitution because the people within our Federal Government are corrupt. Shouldn't you suggest to do away with the real problem- a corrupt people? Everyone knows that the people within the current State Governments are just as corrupt as the people within the current Federal Government.
The problem originates with people in an immoral unethical culture, and not with the Constitution.
A few things here:
First, if it didn't become apparent by the government actions last year and this one - the Constitution no longer exists in the eyes of the Feds. They can do whatever they want, whenever they want. The Compact has already been dissolved.
Case in point - Trump was legally elected TWICE by the American People. During his Administration the Government did everything in it's power to hinder him from doing the job he was elected for. On his re-election, the government decided it didn't want him and committed massive fraud for it to happen. So, the Constitution is already dead.
Second, you mention cleaning up the corrupt people. Who EXACTLY is going to do this when the people responsible for doing it (the DOJ) are just as corrupt as the rest of the government.
Third, you mention the "checks and balances" and, in my first post, I included an excerpt from the Declaration of Independence on not only one of our fundamental rights, but our DUTY, when the government has reached the point it has.
Fourth, what is revolution? Was this very country not founded on revolution? Revolution is when a government has become so criminal and abusive the people have had enough. The Constitution you enshrine in your first sentence would not exist without a revolution. That same Constitution will be little more than toilet paper to the Federal Government in a few more years without a similarly forceful reminder that THE PEOPLE, not the government, are master of this sovereign nation.
Lastly, no one is saying do away with the Constitution. But maybe the American People feel is needs to be shored up for the future. Things such as term limits, actual text in the Constitution to ensure secure and free elections, etc.
That is up to the American People. However, the structure and function of the Constitution has long since been trashed by the government. Remember. the Second Amendment was also given to us as a check and balance for when we reached this very point as well. Our Founders even commented that to preserve liberty a little revolution now and again was a good thing.
Agreed OP! Old saying...A war is when the Government tells you who the Enemy is. A revolution is when the people figure it out for themselves! - Hopefully the Topic of DEVOLUTION comes up in your next Post!?!?!?!
Awesome last sentence in the first response. ??
All true.
First, the Constitution though trampled, still exists. Second, the Military is the only way; Military Intelligence, Marines and Militias. Third, it is our moral duty to uphold the Constitution. Fourth, Revolution is a last resort violent act. It took our Founders 30 years to reach that point. We are just now awakening, and we are not there yet. It may take time, but We The People will persevere and win this peacefully, according to the Constitution. Much is happening such as voter integrity laws. All across our nation, people are waking up and pushing back, getting involved in local government and schools and all other areas of political life. This is the way. And finally, Yes, term limits, decreasing the size and scope of the Federal Government, and other improvements will be required as we work toward a more perfect Constitutional union.
I agree about revolution being the last act - as I mentioned in the post.
The military in not the only way, but it will be the way it ultimately happens.
The Constitution will remain.
But, I want to warn you before reading Post V of something I was bluntly told.
"The military is not engaged to arrest people. That is law enforcement. The military is used to DESTROY the enemy."
Please keep that in mind as to come into reading Post V tomorrow.
I know many have been asking for the tribunals. I was outright told those are NOT going to happen. Actually, the words said to me were, "There are no tribunals on the battlefield."
Some of these things people have understood, but I can promise you people do not really know what it will mean when the military gets involved. That is the part that threw me for a loop. If they get involved, it will NOT be to clean up the Federal Government. I can assure you of that much.
Also, there have been so many people with supposed 'military friends with intel' that I can maybe count as many of them as there are dead Biden supporters. You will recall that back in January many people's 'military sources' told them arrests would happen and EBS would be used and nothing happened. So stop stringing us along with one crumb of information every 24 hours and get to the point already. If you're karma farming or you just want to provide hopium that's fine, but don't act like you know how all of this 'ends' when you contradict your own statements. "the military is the only way", "the whole government had to be shown to be belligerent for the military to step in" but now you're suggesting the feds are going to arrest themselves instead of the military? LOL. Please, save us the 'intel'. We've heard that spiel a thousand times. You probably do have a friend in the military who's a colonel, I won't dispute that, but I highly doubt they'd know how all of this ends. The military is on a need-to-know basis, even the rank of colonels likely wouldn't know how this ends. I don't mean to start any drama, I thoroughly enjoyed the first 2-3 posts in this series, but now it's just starting to read like an opinion piece, i.e. "this is what I hope happens!" and it all seems to be contingent on something your military friend supposedly told you. None of my military sources know shit so why would yours?
I believe the most likely outcome is the audits will play out, fraud will be found at enormous levels, Durham's investigation will be complete with indictments brought forward (and DOJ will look the other way), martial law will be declared at some point ala Myanmar and the indicted traitors will be arrested by the military. They will all be exposed as manufacturing a pandemic to steal an election for China, and that will be enough to awaken the world. Military tribunals will be conducted, 187s will be handed out like free Krispy Kreme donuts, and a special election will be held sometime down the line. Voter ID instituted (already has in some states), along with term limits, a financial reset, social media takeover, media blackout and arrests, etc. etc. The pedos are also in trouble once the Maxwell case takes off. All of which would create a perfect storm. Is this wishful thinking as well? Yes, but it's also the most likeliest outcome and it's been hinted at before by Lin Wood, Powell, Flynn, Q, and even Trump. I trust them over your military source that says the cabal (I'm sorry, I meant law 'enforcement') will arrest the traitors instead of the military.
Not sure that I understand what the implication of that is.... Because if the military won't be arresting everyone and performing tribunals, then who will? The DOJ won't arrest anyone, the FBI won't arrest anyone, law enforcement won't arrest anyone, and the cabal owns and controls them all. The cabal won't be sent to GITMO/prison through the normal court system, and Trump/Q team are keeping GITMO open for a reason. What is the point of Kavanaugh being asked about tribunals then if they aren't ultimately the plan? You also forget that Trump mentioned back in 2015/2016 that if he was President he would try people in a military tribunal as that's faster than the normal court system. I feel like your posts are becoming more wishful thinking than an actual logical prediction of the endgame. You're just contradicting yourself. "The cabal won't arrest itself" and now it's "military won't arrest the cabal, the cabal will arrest itself" ? Trump and Q have also never hinted at abolishing the federal government. They want to replace all of the career politicians in D.C. with patriots and institute term limits and voter ID. Why do you think Trump traveled across the entire country so many times to rally for us to vote for specific senators and congressmen? You're simply not making sense anymore I'm afraid.
Then the only conclusion, the end game by the military, will be to seek and destroy the enemy, whether they are domestic or foreign.
I’m all for that. Kill them. Kill them all.
NCSWIC!
I don't care how they achieve it but the MIL needs to root out and kill/deport/destroy ALL commies, foreign terrorists and illegals. They've been spying on everyone for years so they know exactly who the bad actors are. Get on with it already.
PRONTO!!! You tell your source I said so.
THANK GOD SOMEONE IS PAYING ATTENTION!!!
LetErBuck, the problem is that it doesn't work for free people within a moral / ethical culture. We've seen it fail before our very eyes. What's required is a free people with morals & ethics that are actively involved in our government.
Our government has spent well over a century altering this country to make it as difficult as possible for moral, ethical patriots to be involved. Why do so few people ask why a man with a high school degree in the 1950's could work hard and provide for a family and that's nearly impossible now? Both parents working two jobs, longer hours, less personal net worth. I could write a series of posts on this subject along.
And 240 years has given us the time to see the flaws in the Constitution. As Wayshuba alluded to: The lack of term limits, the lack of election regulations along with a list I could make that stretches several pages. The Constitution is one of the greatest documents ever made by mankind, but it is a flawed document. Did you know that when the Constitution was ratified, many Americans viewed it as a betrayal of the principles enumerated in the Declaration of Independence?
Even in the most ethical culture, the un-ethical will gravitate towards positions of power. Any centralized form of government so removed from it's people (Like D.C.) will become a cancer. The only question is "how long", not "if".
The Constitution is a magnificent starting point, but it is flawed and we are seeing the results of those flaws. "Doing away with corrupt people" would likely require bloodshed at this point and would not resolve the problem for good. But incorporating the lessons we've learned into the existing Constitution could allow this great country to last another 240 years.
JackieDatona74, the Constitution is a brilliant masterpiece, and the very reason why people all over the world risk their lives to come to America. Can you see that just this one fact defeats your overall point that the Constitution itself is irreparibly flawed and must be eliminated. Your writing reveals a position of poverty and preference for destroying democratic government and not improving it. Why? Isn't it better to think about construction, making improvements to a brilliant masterpiece, rather than deconstruction and then what? After all, the flaws in people will not go away, even if the Federal government went away. This fact is another reason your proposition would not provide remedy. We should expect freedom and self governance to be messy, never a straight road, and muddy with human imperfection. And while some may see 240 years of 'failure', so many others have seen and still see Hope and Opportunity- this is what our great Constitution conveys to people all over the world. As inheritors of this "magnificent starting point", is our obligation to work hard to uphold our beloved Constitution. And we will. And btw, term limits can be addressed through law and or amendment so it is not a flaw that this was not entered into the Constitution. And did you consider that the Declaration was written for the benefit of the King and people of England while the Constitution was written for the benefit of We The People of America. And so not sure where you got your fact from but- it is illogical that anyone would think the Constitution and Declaration would cause a "betrayal". Apple and an orange.
I now wonder if it was flawed on purpose. The Crown never really set us free and they had plans long ago to get us back. War of 1812. Helping in our Civil War...
All those Freemasons and Secret Societies since the beginning of our country...
Very good question, HP. I've wondered the same.
As well read as I am on the origins of our country, there's still so much I haven't read. I can't give you a good answer to your question, but it's a question I've wondered about as well.