What if we find out HIV was also manufactured in a lab?
?️ DISCUSSION ?
The "patient zero" pilot story sounded like BS to me even at the time. Thoughts?
Then help me understand why, when the left is all about pimping and pumping homosexuality, would they bother to create the AIDS virus?? Seems counter to their motives of turning all men into soft little soyboys and sissy faggots. No offense.
upvoted for sensible layout of info backed by historical data, well done
So I hate to be the one to tell you this but it's condOm. If women see you spell it condem they may wrongly assume you're unfamiliar with the product and avoid contact with you
Love the analogy of masks and rubbers BTW...in both cases I need to ask believers in the devices this question I got from Rush Limbaugh's show:
Would you KNOWINGLY have sex with an admittedly HIV+, full-blown AIDS-infected person with only a condom to protect you?
Or in this case, Would you KNOWINGLY remain in an 8 x 8-foot enclosed room for half an hour with a person admitting they have full-on COVID symptoms with only their flimsy cloth mask to protect you?
If the answer to either question is no, then the next question is: Then why the hell would you trust the thin barrier when you DON'T know if they have the virus??!! Why would you allow IGNORANCE about their viral load to determine your behavior????!!!
Less children = less powerful families
fear porn you say
Fauci: "HIV can be spread through close contact" (no hugging)
Fauci: "These Euro doctors have something resembling a cure, let's give the gays some AZT (chemo) and that'll do the trick"
Firstly, AZT was not introduced as a typical Chemotherapy drug (that is to say, it wasn't classed as a CTX because of the below.) It was created to target the theory that cancer and tumors were the result of a retrovirus. The mechanism of action was different than other chemotherapy drugs. The hypothesis that cancer was a retrovirus outcome turned out not to be true. HIV/AIDS is however, a retrovirus. It's a Lentivirus.
I know it's popular opinion on anti-medical sites to spout this belief, but it's factually incorrect. I wouldn't bother pointing it out if it was factually true, but when things are false, they're false and should be pointed out.
Then we come to this oft-quoted trope that AZT has killed more people than HIV/AIDS or that AIDS is survivable if it wasn't for AZT.
This is also factually incorrect. If you have unmanaged HIV/AIDS, the outcome isn't going to be a long healthy life. AZT isn't perfect, but it does what it needs to do in most cases. The alternatives are management of symptoms, not management of the underlying disease.
There's so many specific mechanisms involved in Retroviral/Lentivirus infection.
As I've said to others here, you're more than welcome to infect yourself with HIV/AIDS and not manage it and tell me how that pans out for you. No cheating with biologicals either. No monitoring your CBC either. No testing your bone marrow for IMDs.
I think you are correct on 1,2,&3.
Holy shit — you’ve managed to pack a bag load of answers to questions swirling in my head.
C19 is the condom of the year 2020!
I still see assholes wearing them outside... I want to be sorry for them, but I also feel immense disappointed mixed with irritation.
Fauxci CDC makes AIDS. People die. People panic. $$$$$$ for research comes pouring in. More $$$$ gets funneled to
Clinton Global Initiativeglobal AIDS awareness programs. Big Pharma (who funds CDC) sells 116 different drugs for AIDS.https://www.drugs.com/condition/hiv-infection.html?sort=drug&order=asc&page_number=1&page_size=25&category_id=0&include_rx=1&include_otc=1&show_off_label=1&only_generics=0&submitted=0&hide_off_label=0#sortby
Big Pharma pays Cali's Gov. Jerry Brown to lower penalty for knowingly giving a person AIDS down to a misdemeanor. Lifelong customers. Money forever.
Newsweek almost said as much
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/tXe1cUq6.png
It was made in a Philly lab. Probably the same district of Philly that got a gazillion votes for Biden at 3am
1990: Are We Spending Too Much on AIDS?
Damn. 1990. Thanks for the quote. It's crazy seeing it all exposed.
They wanted to make other people afraid of the infected populace, alienate them, thus dividing all of us from our true purpose in life. Gods purpose to love everyone and all gods creations.
Also the globohomo elite. Why attack their own toys?
Money. Look at how much cash has been poured into AIDS research over the past 40 years.
So shocking that they would sell out their ass-pounding brethren just for money
JUST so shocking
They have a political interest in being aligned with the gays ...
Say what you just posted in public ... Watch your life disintegrate all because some of your words offended a white liberal and they decide to contact your employer.
It's the same reason they act like they care about transvestites and black people ... They couldn't give one flying fuck about them ... All they care about are the political benefits in being able to label people if they say something that is not politically correct.
Remember, liberals HATE people. They're nothing more than tools to them. They don't care if a tranny offs himself as a result of mental issues ... That's one less mouth for them to feed in their new world order. However, to get absolute power, they have to use these people to get what they're after.
1987: Fear Porn: AIDS: Are Heterosexuals at Risk?
1990: Money: Are We Spending Too Much on AIDS?