I predict that Trump won CA. I don't know if we will ever find that out for sure, but I really think he did - considering they stopped counting at 65% and left out most of their rural areas.
Ive seen a several diff posts and charts showing he won 410 electoral votes and most states (incl Cali) but not all. Minnesota, NY and a few others stayed blue (to their soon to be realized shame).
No, MN went red too. We ARE a red state. The only "blue" areas are the Twin Cities, but there were 250,000 more votes for Biden in 2020 than there were for Clinton in 2016. Absolute bull. The population didn't rise that much.
By way of example, see if you can spot the outlier in the Democratic vote for President in the DFL stronghold of Hennepin County in Minnesota. Then compare that pattern to the pattern of notoriously corrupt Broward County in Florida.
OK fair enough, but since they stopped counting at 65%, that seems awfully low for any election. One would think they'd get to at least 85% or 90% like other states. Why stop at 65%?
..... rigged elections make it lopsided? I wonder how many illegals voted in California. I assume California is one of the most corrupt states top to bottom.
It doesn't have to be 45% of the urban voters (although I think it is likely more than that). Numbers like that assume that the vote total is real, and that Democrat voters will vote. I live in a very blue area. I know several Democrats who did not vote in the presidential race because Biden was such a poor choice. That's anecdotal, but at least shows the possibility that others simply didn't vote at all.
This of course runs contrary to the fact that the recorded vote total in CA is 25% higher than the second highest vote count ever; which is the 2016 election where somehow Hillary got 6% less than Obama (2008) in the national election, and yet 6% more votes in CA. This is a statistical improbability given that it accounts for more than 1/8th of her total vote count in the national election.
The point is, CA was the first to adopt Smartmatic et al voting systems. It has been fraudulent forever. It was almost strictly red for most of its history, up until Smartmatic moved in. I think not only is the urban vote count for CA substantially higher than 45% for Trump by registered voters, but WAY HIGHER by actual voters.
What if the real issue isn't that Trump won CA, but that it was so close the dems only won by 1-2 points? Even a loss that was that close would show how powerful the MAGA movement really is. Its the last thing the cabal would want.
I think we will know for sure about California and all other states as well. I pray many of the down ballot Senatorial positions will be flipped, particularly in Georgia and Louisiana.
I predict that Trump won CA. I don't know if we will ever find that out for sure, but I really think he did - considering they stopped counting at 65% and left out most of their rural areas.
Ive seen a several diff posts and charts showing he won 410 electoral votes and most states (incl Cali) but not all. Minnesota, NY and a few others stayed blue (to their soon to be realized shame).
No, MN went red too. We ARE a red state. The only "blue" areas are the Twin Cities, but there were 250,000 more votes for Biden in 2020 than there were for Clinton in 2016. Absolute bull. The population didn't rise that much.
I happily stand corrected if I overstated the blue wins.
For context (originally from Nov 4th):
OK fair enough, but since they stopped counting at 65%, that seems awfully low for any election. One would think they'd get to at least 85% or 90% like other states. Why stop at 65%?
..... rigged elections make it lopsided? I wonder how many illegals voted in California. I assume California is one of the most corrupt states top to bottom.
It doesn't have to be 45% of the urban voters (although I think it is likely more than that). Numbers like that assume that the vote total is real, and that Democrat voters will vote. I live in a very blue area. I know several Democrats who did not vote in the presidential race because Biden was such a poor choice. That's anecdotal, but at least shows the possibility that others simply didn't vote at all.
This of course runs contrary to the fact that the recorded vote total in CA is 25% higher than the second highest vote count ever; which is the 2016 election where somehow Hillary got 6% less than Obama (2008) in the national election, and yet 6% more votes in CA. This is a statistical improbability given that it accounts for more than 1/8th of her total vote count in the national election.
The point is, CA was the first to adopt Smartmatic et al voting systems. It has been fraudulent forever. It was almost strictly red for most of its history, up until Smartmatic moved in. I think not only is the urban vote count for CA substantially higher than 45% for Trump by registered voters, but WAY HIGHER by actual voters.
Not counting the Dominion vote of course.
True, but it would take an act of God to get a full audit here. They may not outnumber us, but they are seriously entrenched.
Still, it may happen after AZ.
Yes, we must because of many down ballot positions.
What if the real issue isn't that Trump won CA, but that it was so close the dems only won by 1-2 points? Even a loss that was that close would show how powerful the MAGA movement really is. Its the last thing the cabal would want.
And the rural areas are where the Trump landslide occurred!
I think we will know for sure about California and all other states as well. I pray many of the down ballot Senatorial positions will be flipped, particularly in Georgia and Louisiana.