7
global_cafeous 7 points ago +7 / -0

This isn't really breaking. The decision itself also immediately put an injunction on the judgement up until the day before the deadline, and also specified it would become an indefinite injunction if it was appealed the the USSC.

It's been appealed, and so this is what the decision itself specified.

1
global_cafeous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best response (not that I agree with it) I've seen to the original question is "all voting does is legitimize the steal", arguing for a low turnout strategy to show people are beyond voting now.

2
global_cafeous 2 points ago +2 / -0

The conditions for receiving those rewards are divorced from the reality of how isolation is done, so receiving those rewards is essentially unobtainable by design.

2
global_cafeous 2 points ago +3 / -1

If the blue cities are rioting anyways, no reason to not put in the most based people you can find.

by NOTWOKE
2
global_cafeous 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same people that compiled a list of hundreds of lies he said during his presidency and call him a habitual liar, now because it's in their interest take this 100% literally and believe he's being 100% truthful here.

8
global_cafeous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, not sure why the title is phrased that way. Brian Cates did repost this on his Truth Social feed though.

1
global_cafeous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be careful with assuming links coming from ChatGPT 404ing imply that they were scrubbed from the internet. By the nature of how GPT works, it can fabricate plausible-looking URLs that actually never existed in the first place.

3
global_cafeous 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've lately been wondering if the result of Kari Lake is going to be the legalization of, uh, "enhanced electoral techniques". If they're now legal, no reason we shouldn't adopt them also...

9
global_cafeous 9 points ago +9 / -0

There's an inverse Cramer ETF now for that purpose.

4
global_cafeous 4 points ago +4 / -0

Two people just stopped coming in without even a phone call... and one of those people had been a ten year employee, but they just one day stopped showing up.

If that employee had died suddenly, would you even know?

2
global_cafeous 2 points ago +2 / -0

His now ex-wife. Part of the reason he got the shots is because she wanted to travel and threatened to leave him if he did not.

1
global_cafeous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember: the outcome was going to get appealed regardless, so this is just another step on the path.

view more: Next ›