Thank you for this. Sorry for the false hopium. The 4chan bread was getting interesting so I pulled the trigger posting here when I clearly shouldn’t have.
For those arriving late, the United States Corporation, the "City" of London and the Vatican are understood by some to be the three true owners of the world. If true, this would indeed be the biggest news of the day.
Its not, this is a real estate company. We've apparently got mods stickying without any sort of verification or attempt to look the thing up themselves
Maybe they think they can stop what is coming?
A bit like trying to come back from a 3-0 deficit against Brazil in the last 5 minutes of the world cup final!
The Act of 1871 created a sort of corporate overlay to our Constitution. We have been under the European corporate monarchy control from 1871 until Trump.
This ^ is quite correct. The Act does not the effect of the original Constitution over the States or the people at all.
corporation, association, or individual.
SEc. 17. And be it further enacted, That the legislative assembly shall Special laws
not pass special laws in any of the following cases, that is to say: For not to t be pssed
granting divorces; regulating the practice in courts of justice; regulating fied cases.
the jurisdiction or duties of justices of the peace, police magistrates, or
constables; providing for changes of venue in civil or criminal cases, or
swearing and impaneling jurors; remitting fines, penalties, or forfeitures;
the sale or mortgage of real estate belonging to minors or others under
disability; changing the law of descent; increasing or decreasing the
fees of public officers during the term for which said officers are elected
or appointed; granting to any corporation, association, or individual, any
special or exclusive privilege, immunity, or franchise whatsoever. The
legislative assembly shall have no power to release or extinguish, in whole Assembly to
or in part, the indebtedness, liability, or obligation of any corporation or have no power to
individual to the District or to any municipal corporation therein, nor
shall the legislative assembly have power to establish any bank of circulation, nor to authorize any company or individual to issue notes for circulation as money or currency.
SEC. 18. And be it further enacted, That the legislative power of the Legislative
District shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said Dis- pow the District, consistent with the Constitution of the United States and the pro- what.
visions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon States by the tenth section of the first article of the
Constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly All acts subshall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the Congress of 'ecttorepe a
l,&c
the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive Congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as
if this law had not been enacted.
SEC. 19. And be it further enacted, T
It was innocuous and the lawyers made certain that the result would be wage slavery-however 1868 and 1870 were significant in the settling of Civil War debt that bankrupted the United States and the Crown was more than willing to take on that debt for the burgeoning territory of the United States as collateral....
Anna von Reitz has probably the best compilation of information on this topic that I’ve come across. She’s extremely knowledgeable and dedicated. I wouldn’t put this idea out of the realm of possibility. That other person wants to dismiss it out of hand but for those that want to give it a fair assessment, here’s her site:
If you’re truly interested in the topic, this lady does an excellent job researching. It’s also a fascinating look into old school constitutional republic type stuff:
Maybe things weren’t always this fucked up. That’s the hope that drives this. And that we don’t have to throw everything away to fix our nation, just get back to basics.
I get the "it was formed in 2019, this is a bullshit sticky" talk. BUT, formed by whom? To establish future comms when it was later "dissolved?" Patriots could have formed it, just to send a message when it was dissolved.
Not sure I believe it, but I didn't believe a lot of this Q shit not that long ago ..
Wise words that I definitely always keep in mind. Personally, I find this particular case inconsequential to me as an individual regardless of if it's nothing (!) or a comm (ehh). Felt the need to play devil's advocate since the responses were overwhelmingly one sided. Not my most impassioned moment, I assure you. ?
Check the incorporation date, last time this was posted it was incorporated in 2019 ergo not the actual corporation of the city of London
Lol I mentioned something similar about their stickies earlier
Dammit, fake Evspra. I was almost so happy
Probably, I don't believe after what happened that Evspra would come back with the same name plus underscore
Interdasting
This is nothing, and shouldn't be stickied. The incorporation date was 2019. This was a real estate type business.
Thank you for this. Sorry for the false hopium. The 4chan bread was getting interesting so I pulled the trigger posting here when I clearly shouldn’t have.
For those arriving late, the United States Corporation, the "City" of London and the Vatican are understood by some to be the three true owners of the world. If true, this would indeed be the biggest news of the day.
Its not, this is a real estate company. We've apparently got mods stickying without any sort of verification or attempt to look the thing up themselves
Why sticky this crap? The full sized photo clearly shows incorporation date to be 2019
Maybe they think they can stop what is coming? A bit like trying to come back from a 3-0 deficit against Brazil in the last 5 minutes of the world cup final!
Legitimately interesting. I remember reading thst the US is a corporation as well.
The Act of 1871 created a sort of corporate overlay to our Constitution. We have been under the European corporate monarchy control from 1871 until Trump.
This ^ is quite correct. The Act does not the effect of the original Constitution over the States or the people at all.
corporation, association, or individual. SEc. 17. And be it further enacted, That the legislative assembly shall Special laws not pass special laws in any of the following cases, that is to say: For not to t be pssed granting divorces; regulating the practice in courts of justice; regulating fied cases. the jurisdiction or duties of justices of the peace, police magistrates, or constables; providing for changes of venue in civil or criminal cases, or swearing and impaneling jurors; remitting fines, penalties, or forfeitures; the sale or mortgage of real estate belonging to minors or others under disability; changing the law of descent; increasing or decreasing the fees of public officers during the term for which said officers are elected or appointed; granting to any corporation, association, or individual, any special or exclusive privilege, immunity, or franchise whatsoever. The legislative assembly shall have no power to release or extinguish, in whole Assembly to or in part, the indebtedness, liability, or obligation of any corporation or have no power to individual to the District or to any municipal corporation therein, nor shall the legislative assembly have power to establish any bank of circulation, nor to authorize any company or individual to issue notes for circulation as money or currency. SEC. 18. And be it further enacted, That the legislative power of the Legislative District shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said Dis- pow the District, consistent with the Constitution of the United States and the pro- what. visions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon States by the tenth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly All acts subshall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the Congress of 'ecttorepe a l,&c the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive Congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted. SEC. 19. And be it further enacted, T
It was innocuous and the lawyers made certain that the result would be wage slavery-however 1868 and 1870 were significant in the settling of Civil War debt that bankrupted the United States and the Crown was more than willing to take on that debt for the burgeoning territory of the United States as collateral....
It's funny how you act like you're not familiar with the corporation theories, despite posting here almost every day.
All part of the futile, but ceaseless, attempts to undermine this community I suppose.
There's that insistence on treating your opinion as if it's fact.
Anna von Reitz has probably the best compilation of information on this topic that I’ve come across. She’s extremely knowledgeable and dedicated. I wouldn’t put this idea out of the realm of possibility. That other person wants to dismiss it out of hand but for those that want to give it a fair assessment, here’s her site:
http://www.annavonreitz.com/index.html
He's right.
If you’re truly interested in the topic, this lady does an excellent job researching. It’s also a fascinating look into old school constitutional republic type stuff:
http://www.annavonreitz.com/index.html
Maybe things weren’t always this fucked up. That’s the hope that drives this. And that we don’t have to throw everything away to fix our nation, just get back to basics.
Aren't you tired of embarrassing yourself by posting this swill and doing nothing to back it up, instead just insulting us?
I seem to recall a discussion awhile back about lots of "US Corp" entities.
People digging into it were amazed at all the variants.
Can't remember many details though.
I get the "it was formed in 2019, this is a bullshit sticky" talk. BUT, formed by whom? To establish future comms when it was later "dissolved?" Patriots could have formed it, just to send a message when it was dissolved.
Not sure I believe it, but I didn't believe a lot of this Q shit not that long ago ..
Wise words that I definitely always keep in mind. Personally, I find this particular case inconsequential to me as an individual regardless of if it's nothing (!) or a comm (ehh). Felt the need to play devil's advocate since the responses were overwhelmingly one sided. Not my most impassioned moment, I assure you. ?
What???????? It is HAPPENING!!!!!
This is a real estate company
This site needs to get better at verifying simple information
There's this too
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC380798
Huh?!
Two Down, Two to go..... U.N. and Vatican.....