Comments (53)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
populist_nationalist -39 points ago +1 / -40

I don't now how that would be good news. The longer they drag this on, the more likely they don't have the goods. I'm also skeptical that nothing substantial would leak by now if there were something substantial to leak.

Xirturn1984 25 points ago +25 / -0

They just came out last night and said right off the bat they dont have anything close to the 2.1 million votes AZ said they had

populist_nationalist -23 points ago +1 / -24

That ain't shit unless they have evidence of what happened to those 2.1 million ballots and who is responsible for their destruction and/or lack of existence in teh first place.

MegaMAGAMichiPede 20 points ago +20 / -0

Those ballots are supposed to be preserved for 22 months following a federal election, no excuses. If they’re not present one of two scenarios is true—they were destroyed or never existed—and both would end in criminal charges for those who administered the election.

chase_now 4 points ago +5 / -1

If there is missing evidence then I think by law you can assume the worst happened. Basically missing ballots or finding fraudulent ballots should be the same under the law.

populist_nationalist -4 points ago +2 / -6

All of this crap has happened before and there was fuck all for consequences. The sad truth is that any criminal charges will be filed against some low-level bureaucrat.

Reddit_is_for_cucks 15 points ago +15 / -0

Do you not understand the implications of certifying vote counts that include ballots that don't exist?

chase_now 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is the government has a double standard. If a private company doesn't have evidence in an audit the business gets shut down and people go to jail or big fines will happen.

Everytime the government does it they get reelected and pay increases.

populist_nationalist -1 points ago +1 / -2

It worked out just fine for DWS.

DesertBrat 12 points ago +12 / -0

And, in the meantime, various States are sending Representatives to check out the audit process for their potential audits.

mattroomsq 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes a domino effect is happening.

deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
OutOfBubbleGum52021 9 points ago +9 / -0

The longer they drag this on

What dates have "they" changed?

Oldgal_frdup 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think we will hear the recount numbers soon. The forensics will be the real killer. They will take at least 2-3 weeks.Folds, paper, ink, circles filled in by machines, water marks and so much more. That could take a bit longer. I'm trying to be patient. Jovan said he has 200 patents in the field of forensics. I trust he has ways to uncover things he hasn't even discussed in public yet.

populist_nationalist -13 points ago +2 / -15

Everyone was datefagging about June 14 because it's Donald Trump's birthday just a couple days ago.

OutOfBubbleGum52021 12 points ago +12 / -0

Maybe stop listening to "they" and "everyone" Focus on the facts....they are not hard to see.

DharmaRising108 4 points ago +4 / -0

People here were wrong, June 14 was always the day to be done counting. It was never the day that the whole audit would be done.

StormSailor 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, so you're just a concern troll then.

"Guys, this datefag turned out to be false. Clearly Q is a larp because the dates that others come up with don't come to pass. Gais gais, the audit is a nothingburger because Trump wasn't reinstated on June 14 like CNN promised me."

LockHerUp17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not "everyone". Just some crusty telegram LARPs that don't do any research, just repost and act like they are insiders. Cough whiplash cough.

Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

datefagging is alwys frowned upon here, because we see that is weaponised.

Woodinleg 7 points ago +7 / -0

Control of timeline is key to strategery.