The idea of “science” being “controlled” is retarded. As if a moral force “controlling” it would sAvE uS aLL. Science is a process. The problem is science is being treated as an entity, a force, a stance, a god.
I am not telling you that discernment and science are etymologically related, I am telling you the definition of science. Definitions of words are generally not simple translations if their etymological roots.
mid-14c., "what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty," from Old French science "knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge" (12c.), from Latin scientia "knowledge, a knowing; expertness," from sciens (genitive scientis) "intelligent, skilled," present participle of scire "to know," probably originally *"to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide" (from PIE root skei- "to cut, split;" source also of Greek skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan "to divide, separate").
"perceive or recognize the difference or distinction between (two or more things);" also "distinguish (an object) with the eyes, see distinctly, behold;" also "perceive rationally, understand;" late 14c., from Old French discerner (13c.) "distinguish (between), separate" (by sifting), and directly from Latin discernere "to separate, set apart, divide, distribute; distinguish, perceive," from dis- "off, away" (see dis-) + cernere "distinguish, separate, sift" (from PIE root *krei- "to sieve," thus "discriminate, distinguish"). Related: Discerned; discerning.
i.e. to discern what can be known
Science is the process if discerning (distinguishing/separating/sifting through) what can be known from what is false and/or can not or can not yet be known.
I sent you the actual etymology of the word science and discernment and you keep moving the goalposts.
Science is not made of “sci” and “ence,” you fucking retard. Ence plays no part in the roots of the word “science,” and it’s not even evident that it is even a latin or greek root.
Science can be distilled down accurately to the phrase “the process of discerning what can be known,” and that is basically what objective epistemology can also be distilled down to, so it’s funny that you bring it up. “Go read the entirety of Objectivist Epistemology” sounds like an insult made by a person who just learned the phrase.
The anti-Christ isn’t a person. There is a ‘spirit’ of the anti-Christ, a system of values, ideas and actions that are Anti-christian.
Whether you think it is mark of the beast, or not, the vaccine passports are inherently anti-christian, by their nature, because it pulls the value of a human being out of the spiritual, where we are all equal value in the eyes of God, into the physical, where our value is literally determined as to whether we are literally obedient to an authority that is necessarily satanic, being of the earthly realm.
“Conferring exclusive privileges upon bodies of physicians, and forbidding men of equal talents and knowledge, under severe penalties from practicing medicine within certain districts of cities and countries. Such institutions, however sanctioned by ancient charters and names, are the Bastilles of our science.” -- Dr. Benjamin Rush - Founding Father and Signatory of the Declaration of Independence
I would suggest that’s what Lindbergh was speaking on.. nothing God created is innately evil.. money, weapons..etc. are neither good or bad.. what moral compass seeks or uses it determines that. The greater the good anything can be used for, the greater the evil it can be used for.. science can be used for great things…. HENSE !!!!
Isn't the problem we have right now that science is controlled?
Mmhmm!!! By Who is the bigger question to a larger problem !!
The idea of “science” being “controlled” is retarded. As if a moral force “controlling” it would sAvE uS aLL. Science is a process. The problem is science is being treated as an entity, a force, a stance, a god.
Exactly. The idea of considering it an entity or a thing to be controlled at all IS the problem.
Science is open for all; the best science is that in which the findings are reproducible by the most people possible.
that’s not the “best” science, that’s the ONLY science, and anything that is not that, is not science.
True!
Science is the discernment of what can be known.
I am not telling you that discernment and science are etymologically related, I am telling you the definition of science. Definitions of words are generally not simple translations if their etymological roots.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/science
science (n.)
mid-14c., "what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty," from Old French science "knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge" (12c.), from Latin scientia "knowledge, a knowing; expertness," from sciens (genitive scientis) "intelligent, skilled," present participle of scire "to know," probably originally *"to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide" (from PIE root skei- "to cut, split;" source also of Greek skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan "to divide, separate").
https://www.etymonline.com/word/discern#etymonline_v_11382
discern (v.)
"perceive or recognize the difference or distinction between (two or more things);" also "distinguish (an object) with the eyes, see distinctly, behold;" also "perceive rationally, understand;" late 14c., from Old French discerner (13c.) "distinguish (between), separate" (by sifting), and directly from Latin discernere "to separate, set apart, divide, distribute; distinguish, perceive," from dis- "off, away" (see dis-) + cernere "distinguish, separate, sift" (from PIE root *krei- "to sieve," thus "discriminate, distinguish"). Related: Discerned; discerning.
i.e. to discern what can be known
Science is the process if discerning (distinguishing/separating/sifting through) what can be known from what is false and/or can not or can not yet be known.
where the fuck did you come up with sci + ence?
You are full of hot air.
I sent you the actual etymology of the word science and discernment and you keep moving the goalposts.
Science is not made of “sci” and “ence,” you fucking retard. Ence plays no part in the roots of the word “science,” and it’s not even evident that it is even a latin or greek root.
Science can be distilled down accurately to the phrase “the process of discerning what can be known,” and that is basically what objective epistemology can also be distilled down to, so it’s funny that you bring it up. “Go read the entirety of Objectivist Epistemology” sounds like an insult made by a person who just learned the phrase.
Did you just learn that phrase?
Yes. Science is being worshiped as a false idol. That is the true issue.
I think maybe he means scientists need a strong moral foundation.
But yeah certainly the problem with science today is that it is controlled and open ended inquiry is largely stifled
I think you might like my respons above :) (or below...see where it lands :)
Same with the media and academia.
The military is the last institution not controlled by satanic progressives
Is that why they are running all those Ike commercials?
Yeah I hope that’s part of the plan somehow. If the military is lost, we’re in big trouble
The military is lost. Why do you think they went after Flynn so hard?
The anti- Christ is using science against humanity
You have evidence that he is here currently? Or just a type?
The anti-Christ isn’t a person. There is a ‘spirit’ of the anti-Christ, a system of values, ideas and actions that are Anti-christian.
Whether you think it is mark of the beast, or not, the vaccine passports are inherently anti-christian, by their nature, because it pulls the value of a human being out of the spiritual, where we are all equal value in the eyes of God, into the physical, where our value is literally determined as to whether we are literally obedient to an authority that is necessarily satanic, being of the earthly realm.
i dunno. Klaus Schwab or Gates seem to fit the bill pretty fucking well!!
if he's here, he hasn't come out with it yet. My guess is a type is among [them]
“Conferring exclusive privileges upon bodies of physicians, and forbidding men of equal talents and knowledge, under severe penalties from practicing medicine within certain districts of cities and countries. Such institutions, however sanctioned by ancient charters and names, are the Bastilles of our science.” -- Dr. Benjamin Rush - Founding Father and Signatory of the Declaration of Independence
While the scientific method must remain neutral, its ethics must restrict its ability to do anything to anyone.
Every field has ethics. The ? Is what governs the behavior within that field? Profit? Christian morals? Islam?
Hence the controversies over cloning, issues of informed consent, etc.
Without rules, mankind will find a way to turn any endeavor into a self serving, sociopathic one.
I would suggest that’s what Lindbergh was speaking on.. nothing God created is innately evil.. money, weapons..etc. are neither good or bad.. what moral compass seeks or uses it determines that. The greater the good anything can be used for, the greater the evil it can be used for.. science can be used for great things…. HENSE !!!!
Well said!
The ethics ""bind" (control) this force. That's what I was trying to say anyway :)
Fauci looks like one of the puppet characters from the movie "The Dark Crystals".
Bingo!
chosen sons of snakes
People weren’t afraid to tell the truth about jews