How is it possible every nation in the Antarctic treaty has held up their end of the deal? No oil exploration? Nothing? Seriously? Why does John Kerry keep going there? He may be a Globalist climate radical, but seriously? He's not a scientist! Why is every thing these people have done exactly like Nazis? Even down to medical experimentation?Where did those 43,000 german women who were shipped to Antarctica at the end of WWII go? Is it possible we are actually dealing with the 4th Reich? Did Nazis really escape to Antarctica? Why can't a plane traverse it? Why are all plane paths set to completely avoid it? Environmental reasons? For real? If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you! What is our reality? WHO or WHAT is in Antarctica?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (632)
sorted by:
I still want to know how an 14c map of the world, which was put together using ancient maps of countries and seas .... showed an accurate coastline of the Antarctica along with rivers and mountain peaks.... hundreds of years before it was ‘discovered’ officially......!
I also recall that someone suggested that the location of Antarctica shown on that map was 22 degrees off its current position today.... I remember thinking if that might have anything to do with the 22 / 23 degrees we are off tilt of our axis....
I never looked into it more than that but that was one detail that stuck in my head as a coincidence......!
I don’t buy into the Nazi rumours or Birds later expedition post ww2.... I think that the evidence so far shows that Antarctica has significant resources.... and perhaps in searching for that we have found something that is significant to our history or that proves something ( I don’t know what exactly) that our governments want to keep secret from us publicly....
WWG1WGA
I think it was the Piri Reis map that showed the accurate coastline. His map was from the 16th century but he said it was based on hundreds of ancient maps that no longer exist today. It's possible that this planet has had civilizations capable of crossing the sea and accurately mapping the planet LONG before Piri Reis' time, but nobody takes the Atlantis story seriously these days it seems. Personally, I think it's the most important "conspiracy theory", "myth", or "legend" that exists today.
I have a folder full of maps on my desktop from the Library of Congress, and many of them from the 17th-18th century have Atlantis labeled. Some show North America as Atlantis, while others have Antarctica as Atlantis. I also found a perfectly drawn Pepsi logo on a map from the 17th century. Strange enough, it's used to label an island known as Hy-Brasil. Someone needs to explain that.
If there was an "Atlantis", it was most likely the area that is now the South China Sea. The South China sea is strange - average depth of 150 feet, which would have been 250 feet above sea level during the ice age.
11,000 years ago, that was a sub-continent sized isthmus that would have been one of the best places to live during the ice age climate. Warm, with a good amount of precipitation.
As the planet warmed up at the start of our current inter-glacial period (Holocene), that sub continent flooded. There is a reason that all ancient civilizations contain some sort of flood mythology in common.
Does a cup filled to the brim with water and ice overflow when the ice melts? Or does the resulting water from the melted ice just reoccupy the space that previously held the ice?
The earth as a system is very much like the glass of water with the ice. If there was a flood, it definitely wasn’t from ice melting.
That doesnt take into account the ice and claciera that are over land that melt and fill into the ocean. If an icecube is on a shelf above a glass of water and the icecube melts and trickles into that water cup, does the water level not rise?
I am not sure how you can say "definitely wasn't" about anything that happened 12,000 years ago. If you haven't looked into Randall Carlson's and Graham Hancock's writings on geological evidence of massive catastrophic flooding then I highly recommend them.
You are talking about sea ice. Continental ice sheets approx. 1 mile thick covered much of the northern hemisphere. Seal level was 400 feet lower than it is today due to all the water locked up in the glaciers on land.
The land bridge between Asia and North America, and the subcontinent that became the South China Sea are two areas of land that flooded when the continental glaciers melted and sea level rose 400 feet (over time).
This is true but not a full comparison, the earth's crust rebounds after the weight of ice (think continental ice shelf) and that melt water has to go somewhere else. The Hudson Bay is a good example of crustal rebounding
Depends. If the meltwater came from ice which, itself, was floating (think North Pole), then I agree.
If the meltwater came from iced-up bedrock (think Antarctica), then sea level must rise. Maybe, with pole-flipping, this is why sea level, globally, has been up and down like a whore's drawers on VE Day.
It might not have been the big island of Atlantis, but likely one of the 10 islands that Plato referred to. I don't think it's a stretch to say that the Sahara desert held several of these islands until the huge flood washed them away. Just look at the NW coast of Africa and notice the evidence for massive flooding from the west. There are striations all over the landscape that suggest floods ravaged the entire top half of Africa thousands of years ago. I think this is related to what Plato described.
Also, we learn that the earliest people to settle Egypt came from the west with skills necessary to build a civilization. After all, even Plato clearly said that the remnants of Atlantis laid where the Moorlands were in his time. The Moorlands are the lands of the Moors, or the region that now makes up NW Africa. It seems pretty clear to me.
Or, there really was a global flood. The stories spread into the families as they spread around the world. The account in Genesis is the most accurate and all other versions have varying elements in common.
Something like these off Japan?
Yonaguni Jima:
https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20210311-japans-mysterious-underwater-city
Solon was given the story of Atlantis while he was in Egypt around 600 BC. That story was passed on to Plato around 350 BC. Herodotus also mentions it around 440 BC, and many others have written about it since then. The Egyptian priests were clear that Atlantis was real, and that it existed 9,000 years before their time (9600 BC). They even said that Athenians were the first great civilization, 1,000 years older than even the Atlanteans, yet they were wiped out by a stronger army.
Look up the Atlantis videos from Bright Insight on youtube. Lots of evidence suggesting it’s the Eye of the Sahara.
I could talk about that all day. He has some good info but also leaves out a lot of important context. For example, he quotes Plato when talking about where Atlantis might have been, but he fails to quote Plato saying that Atlantis was an island kingdom consisting of 10 islands that stretched from the west coast of Africa to Egypt. To me, that's a pretty big clue to leave out. I think he's just in the early stages of learning about this stuff. I wrote a paper in college about the Eye of the Sahara about a year before Bright Insight ever put out a video about it. It's gaining popularity finally.
That’s interesting, I appreciate the info! Got any good articles or links to send my way? I love learning about this kind of stuff and I’m open to any ideas.
In the mid 1980's there was a guy who claimed he found Atlantis. The story appeared on national news (ABC or CBS) and it showed video of a man made rectangular structure underwater in the middle of the Mediterranean (closer to Agean) roughly 200' below the surface.
Of course, it could not be confirmed as the actual city Atlantis. But it was definitely a man made stone structure, roughly the size of a football field, and underwater imaging was able to see it clearly. Long story short- I've never seen, nor heard a single thing about that guy, nor what that rectangle structure is to this day. And I have looked for info about it too.
to that point, the word "Island" is a mistranslation, the original word used to mean much more than just that, he pointed that out in his most recent "Secret Files on The Eye of The Sahara" video.
if that was your only big counterpoint, you might want to reconsider it. (also, supposed Atlantean mythological names were/are popular in the western sahara region, and actually name some of them.
There isa reason no one knows about this stuff. Trade routes would have been highly classified information, hundreds of years ago.
Agartha is real, fren. It IS important or that slime Kerry wouldn’t be there, eh?
Hundreds of maps we are told no longer exist.
Also seen Atlantis depicted on maps, one off the coast of Africa.
This is theorised to be the layout of Atlantis in Mauritania (the eye of the Sahara- The Richat Structure).
Also heard 'Mu' mentioned, haven't investigated yet though, stuck down a dozen other rabbit holes as usual..
The secret societies have been making smoke and mirror stories since they needed to conceal the secrets. Maybe we could trace that back through history.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j0MTB145/pepsi-logo-on-a-map-from-1559-la/c/
Antarctica is 100% wrong on the modern map. Its an ice shelf that circles the whole earth. Older humans knew.
What is beyond the shelf?
apparently nothing until you get to the firmament
People say that, but (conveniently) nobody ever seems able to provide video proof of this.
Actually everything on a map is wrong that's not directly on the equator. The further away you get from the equator, all land masses look bigger than they really are. It's called "Mercator Projection" if you're interested.
One of many types of projections. Some show accurate to scale across the whole projection. Most show landmass to scale. Nautical charts show the water to scale.
It's an historical fact that bird went there. You saying they made it up?
The Piri Reis map has been debunked, it shows the coastline of South America, not Antarctica.
That's one interpretation. I happen to believe many people knew about Antarctica. Here's a map from 1565 showing Antarctica and it's even labeled as "Antartico"...who knows?
https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3200.mf000070/
I try not to use that word in front of the kids haha.