I don’t know why anyone gets excited by these releases because you’re totally right. We already have a million documented discrepancies from the election, even that video of Dems running stashed ballots multiple times through machines. The normies don’t know or care because the media suppresses or dismisses all of it. If the media doesn’t change then it won’t matter.
I hear that all the time too. "I didn't see that reported anywhere", Anywhere being where they watch, or what is considered "credible". They'll say they don't trust the media but then at the same time they have to see something on that same media to believe it. Even my husband will hear something like this and say, "that's great but if nobody ever hears about it, what good will it do?" The legacy media needs to be destroyed. It's that plain and simple, and I don't mean using violence or anything, I mean exposed and convicted and eliminated. Out of the way!
Even amongst network techies, the ability to read a comprehend pcap files fully is not common. There is a lot more to it than simply 'source/destination/port' etc.
Having said that they are fairly difficult to fake. Not impossible, but it would require a lot of skill and time. The more there is, the harder it is to fake.
Since you want to sniff balls and split cunt hairs lets have a closer look
Define:TRIBUNAL The seat of a judge; the place where he administers justice; a judicial court: the bench of judges. See Foster v. Worcester, 10 Pick. (Mass.) 81. In Roman law. An elevated seat occupied by the pretor. when he judged, or heard causes in form. Originally a kind of stage made of wood in the form of a square, and movable, but afterwards built of stone in the form of a semicircle. Adams, Rom. Ant. 132, 133.
Define: COURT In a wide sense, any duly constituted tribunal administering the laws of the state or nation; in a narrower sense, a court proceeding according to the course of the common law and governed by its rules and principles, as contrasted with a “court of equity.” - Black's Law Dictionary
as you can see a tribunal is a type of court, we have many courts, traffic court, family court, supreme court.
point is they all require evidence and its still THAT FUCKING SIMPLE if you have the evidence fucking do it.
I mean they where took to court bro, like you said, that was done, what did that do?
I'ts simply, not that simple lol, what can we say that will make you grasp this?
Pinochet was the only one to pull off what you want, and Chile is becoming communist anyway, within one lifetime, they have to kill the cabal completely, they are a cancer and they have to be careful when they finally "OPERATE", that they don't throw cancer particles and spread them to the wind. We don't want desperate retaliation either, we are against nuclear powers here. Brainwashing people is not an option anymore if people are awake, if brainwashing is not an option anymore, you think they are just going to lay down and give up?
Yall are not wrong, but this will be a big win for me because I work in IT and can use this to redpill coworkers. Video, testimony, you name it, it's jusy political theater for a lot of normies. If you can show them something that resonates with them personally as true, that can be a hardcore redpill for some.
Also, I have family that will jot be able to argue with me on this. I may not convince them I'm definitely right, but I can convince them that they are wrong until they get a little smarter themselves.
I don’t know why anyone gets excited by these releases because you’re totally right. We already have a million documented discrepancies from the election, even that video of Dems running stashed ballots multiple times through machines. The normies don’t know or care because the media suppresses or dismisses all of it. If the media doesn’t change then it won’t matter.
I hear that all the time too. "I didn't see that reported anywhere", Anywhere being where they watch, or what is considered "credible". They'll say they don't trust the media but then at the same time they have to see something on that same media to believe it. Even my husband will hear something like this and say, "that's great but if nobody ever hears about it, what good will it do?" The legacy media needs to be destroyed. It's that plain and simple, and I don't mean using violence or anything, I mean exposed and convicted and eliminated. Out of the way!
Same thing here. Wife goes, but is it on the news. I'm like the same f'ing news that I proved to you is corrupt?
Ask if they only believe what the billionaires tell them to believe.
I like this. Now convince me you know of MSM not controlled by billionaires.
Exactly! Although be prepared for the obligatory “but NPR isn’t corporate” response.
There’s a list somewhere of all the funding given to NPR and it’s nothing but big corporations and democrat donors.
It would be good to be prepared when they try to pull the provably false “NPR is entirely donation based” BS.
Maybe not MSM but we have grass roots stuff like the .win sites and first hand accounts that I believe.
Even amongst network techies, the ability to read a comprehend pcap files fully is not common. There is a lot more to it than simply 'source/destination/port' etc.
Having said that they are fairly difficult to fake. Not impossible, but it would require a lot of skill and time. The more there is, the harder it is to fake.
FUCK THE MEDIA
FUCK THE NORMIES
WHO CARES
Stop dicking around with the constant carrot on a stick bullshit, PULL THE FUCKING TRIGGER, and take these cock suckers to court.
ITS THAT FUCKING SIMPLE if you have evidence.
You misspelled "to Tribunal"...
Since you want to sniff balls and split cunt hairs lets have a closer look
Define:TRIBUNAL The seat of a judge; the place where he administers justice; a judicial court: the bench of judges. See Foster v. Worcester, 10 Pick. (Mass.) 81. In Roman law. An elevated seat occupied by the pretor. when he judged, or heard causes in form. Originally a kind of stage made of wood in the form of a square, and movable, but afterwards built of stone in the form of a semicircle. Adams, Rom. Ant. 132, 133.
Define: COURT In a wide sense, any duly constituted tribunal administering the laws of the state or nation; in a narrower sense, a court proceeding according to the course of the common law and governed by its rules and principles, as contrasted with a “court of equity.” - Black's Law Dictionary
as you can see a tribunal is a type of court, we have many courts, traffic court, family court, supreme court.
point is they all require evidence and its still THAT FUCKING SIMPLE if you have the evidence fucking do it.
I mean they where took to court bro, like you said, that was done, what did that do?
I'ts simply, not that simple lol, what can we say that will make you grasp this?
Pinochet was the only one to pull off what you want, and Chile is becoming communist anyway, within one lifetime, they have to kill the cabal completely, they are a cancer and they have to be careful when they finally "OPERATE", that they don't throw cancer particles and spread them to the wind. We don't want desperate retaliation either, we are against nuclear powers here. Brainwashing people is not an option anymore if people are awake, if brainwashing is not an option anymore, you think they are just going to lay down and give up?
This might be a movie, but it's not a game.
It sounds simple, but the DOJ and the courts are hopelessly corrupt. The military is the only way and that seems even more unlikely as time passes.
Who said anything about the DOJ or SCOTUS?
Doesnt matter what fucking court you go to they all work they same.
its still THAT FUCKING SIMPLE if you have the evidence
It was taken to dozens of public and secret courts. Maybe they already said most are guilty, think mafia sting op
Yall are not wrong, but this will be a big win for me because I work in IT and can use this to redpill coworkers. Video, testimony, you name it, it's jusy political theater for a lot of normies. If you can show them something that resonates with them personally as true, that can be a hardcore redpill for some.
Also, I have family that will jot be able to argue with me on this. I may not convince them I'm definitely right, but I can convince them that they are wrong until they get a little smarter themselves.
Questioning the source of the file seems like the most likely retort IMO