When companies with the megaphone send Internal E-mails like this…… WE NEED TO BE THE FLOOD !!!🔥🔥
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
By definition all pedophiles abuse children.
CNN are a bunch of pedo-protectors.
Actually you are wrong. Pedophilia is literally defined as the sexual attraction to children. The abuse itself is referred to as child sexual abuse or child molestation.
But I think we all agree they should burn in hell no matter what the semantics are.
Defined by who?
literally the word, pedo refers to the age group of 0-12 i believe and philia is fetish
No, it comes from a word meaning "love".
Philadelphia = Brotherly love. Francophile = Lover of France and things French.
However, I think most people today when they use the word "pedophile" are thinking of more than just "love".
Literally all dictionaries.
If you can find me a legit definition somewhere that includes abuse, I'll reconsider.
Either way, I do want to make it clear that I'm not trying to normalize these people. They need help. But I also realize that criminalizing thoughts is a VERY slippery slope.
If it is just thoughts, we’d never know. If they act upon thoughts, they are no longer just thoughts. Pretty simple I’m my opinion. Attraction to minors 0-12 = pedophile. Not normal.
While I'm inclined to agree with you and initially thought that it was correct to separate them, this push to isolate those with just a sexual attraction to children vs those who've raped a child is just another push to normalize the sexual attraction. So fuck it, and fuck them for trying.
I get your point, even the attraction is disgusting. Normalization should NEVER EVER EVER happen.
But thoughts are not a crime...only actions. Those people can possibly be helped with medication or therapy. Or if all else fails, maybe lobotomy.
I do agree, and am more willing to accept that a pedo hasn't hurt anyone and is seeking help to avoid such urges, but that isnt what commies want.
I guess they're not abusing children if they don't look at porn or abduct or lure kids.
But that's really the hill they want to die on?
Really?
Not a very stable or admirable hill.
It makes more sense to call them what they are, by what they do, than to classify someone who is attracted to a lascivious 17-year old (but comports himself appropriately) in the same category as someone who actually diddles a toddler. There's a difference there, one probably worth noting.
A "pedophile" is someone who wants to abuse children; a "pederast" is someone that actually does it... learned that word from the Big Lebowski...