Maybe, but not because of those EOs. Those EOs are entirely related to 1) making a report of election issues caused by foreign parties and including recommendations as appropriate, and 2) imposing financial sanctions on any persons who caused those problems.
It is also important to note the dates of the EOs. Colonel Waldron said they were from 2015, which means they were written by Hussein. Maybe EOs that were intended to be used by Hildebeast against conservatives, but are now backfiring on them since the witch lost?
Wrong, EO 13848 and 13849 are sequential, from September 12 and 20, 2018. Whatever Waldron said about Obama would relate to something done or drafted earlier. These are the same EO's that we've been saying since December were known to have been triggered because the DNI made his public response. The apparent weakness of the public response does not mean its private attachments were legally insufficient to proceed with devolution.
Yeah... I just saw something about Nick Fuentes (don't know who he is, but it was posted here) having 500K seized. Would that be part of it? I'm assuming a lot of celebrity home sales are part of that, but haven't been tracking...
Maybe, but not because of those EOs. Those EOs are entirely related to 1) making a report of election issues caused by foreign parties and including recommendations as appropriate, and 2) imposing financial sanctions on any persons who caused those problems.
It is also important to note the dates of the EOs. Colonel Waldron said they were from 2015, which means they were written by Hussein. Maybe EOs that were intended to be used by Hildebeast against conservatives, but are now backfiring on them since the witch lost?
Incorrect, these were signed by Trump
One by Hussein and one by Trump
Wrong, EO 13848 and 13849 are sequential, from September 12 and 20, 2018. Whatever Waldron said about Obama would relate to something done or drafted earlier. These are the same EO's that we've been saying since December were known to have been triggered because the DNI made his public response. The apparent weakness of the public response does not mean its private attachments were legally insufficient to proceed with devolution.
How? Both were issued in Sept on 2018. Both by 45
I believe they were drafted by obama and then edited and signed by trump. I know there were a few EOs like that
Oh the irony lol
If Hillary won do you think they wouldve dropped the russian collusion case? No. Thats what they were for and trump used it against them. Genius.
The financial sanctions are ambiguous... seizing assets as a whole I would assume.
Yeah... I just saw something about Nick Fuentes (don't know who he is, but it was posted here) having 500K seized. Would that be part of it? I'm assuming a lot of celebrity home sales are part of that, but haven't been tracking...
Plus the Rothchikds selling their land (hunting camp 🤮). Tons of holleyweirdo's selling their homes....,
Buckingham palace being emptied, under the guise of "renovations"
Was wondering same 😎
Does this fit in? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27925/blocking-the-property-of-persons-involved-in-serious-human-rights-abuse-or-corruption
Yes. All the farmland owned by Bill Gates, the Vatican archives & treasures... :)
Interesting that the "pope" cut the salaries of cardinals and was begging for donations... 🤔
And auctioning the leftovers I imagine.