Comments (56)
sorted by:
Darstradamus 47 points ago +48 / -1

That and communism...lots of communism...

Brent75 31 points ago +32 / -1

Exactly what Dars stated. Also The Cabal expected the current deaths to be waaaaay higher, and yes, that it’ll go up by worse Covid, issues with the vaccine, and Communists slaughtering people. Research the Nazi’s, Bolsheviks, Khmer Rouge, The Vietcong, Cuba, North Korea, and China. Once the forcing of something starts like vaccinations, their rules/laws, and their “education” to the masses, they in-turn massacre ALL opposition! It’s historical fact.

ProphetBoi 14 points ago +14 / -0

We're the opposition.

This is gonna be interesting

adragons 25 points ago +27 / -2

No it's just death-rate catching up to birth-rate: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/births-and-deaths-projected-to-2100?country=~OWID_WRL

People are living longer now than ever before.

FourRosesBourbonV2 12 points ago +13 / -1

100% Thanks for being rational

kula 1 point ago +1 / -0

These are projected rates, so hypothetical. The actual data will change this graph radically. 45000 vaccine deaths for example or unreported deaths responsible for millions of job vacancies.

adragons 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe we'll see. Vaccine effects aren't yet known so they aren't included in the projection. The twitter OP implies they are.

kula 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt we'll see any vaccine effects in the projection. Front line doctors pushing for transparency https://teapartypac.org/bombshell-new-lawsuit-claims-45000-vaccine-deaths-being-hidden/

TradCatVeritas 1 point ago +2 / -1

This chart is even more alarming! Why predict births going down and deaths going up? What would cause such a phenomenon ?

Impossipede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting side note I read a while back. Certain Chinese manufacturers of baby products expected a large downturn in profits in 2022. Anyone think of a valid reason for that? I mean other than a massive problem of chronic miscarriages caused by vaccinated women whose bodies are now programmed to attack spike proteins which just happen to also be in placental tissue thereby causing a large portion of the world's population to be effectively infertile? Even if that only affects 30% of the jabbed, that's huge.

adragons 1 point ago +1 / -0

Deaths go up because births went up. Births go down because they think the population will level off at ~10.9B https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2019/06/2019-Revision-%E2%80%93-World-Population-Growth-1700-2100-772x550.png

TradCatVeritas 2 points ago +3 / -1

Again, what would cause births to go down when deaths go up? Why would people stop having babies??? What do they think is going to happen?

DrMcCoy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Many people have been sterilized from the jab already.

Heldiggrisen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would love the source for this to show my mum.

adragons -2 points ago +1 / -3

Think for a second.

what would cause births to go down when deaths go up?

There is no relationship.

Deaths go up because births went up. Period. That's all.

Births go down because of social/economic situation. Look at japan, korea, Taiwan They're full. Population levelled off. It'll go up slightly, down slightly but barring any war or disaster will probably stay the same.

People are not stopping having babies. But instead of everyone having 3+ kids on average, it'll be 2.1 kids average. Cities are full. Worlds full. Yes, there is a lot of wilderness still, but it's needed to conserve natural wildlife and capture carbon.

TradCatVeritas 1 point ago +2 / -1

And the truth comes out! The globalist/communist mind fears the wilderness shrinking and strong families growing and they are willing to sterilize themselves and others because of it. This is a war on human nature. If they can't convince you to sterilize yourself they will attempt to do it for you. That is what these charts are predicting.

LetterKennyParkBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

deaths tracks with world population pretty well too

2020voter 18 points ago +19 / -1

Something wicked this way comes... Bradbury.

INK10 5 points ago +5 / -0

Before Bradbury, Shakespeare. MacBeth "by the pricking of my thumb, something wicked this way comes" Sorry raised a few English majors.

2020voter 1 point ago +1 / -0


inquimous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Each horizontal increment is 20 years, or a generation. It would be reasonable if deaths were increasing in proportion to births, but to be reasonable like that they would have to be assuming the population doubles every generation.

EUssr 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well, they've long convinced me to have at least half a dozen to a dozen kids.

Possibly more if we'll end up with multiple tuplets.

7Nick9 5 points ago +5 / -0

Really ? That's great but talk to your husband first.. 😁

EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be me. I'll have to hold back and try not to be too much of a burden on my wife.

I certainly wouldn't mind having dozens of kids.

for_real 5 points ago +8 / -3

That 2-3 decade upswing is the Boomers dying. Once they die it starts to plateau. The global population did in fact double from WWII to 1980

CorpseLivesMatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

This chart represents the deaths expected in the UN, not the USA.

for_real 0 points ago +2 / -2

Right, the postwar population boom happened later in much of the world, but it's the same basic explanation for the projected rise in annual deaths. The number of deaths in this decade is mainly a function of what was happening 7 decades before.

rooftoptendie 4 points ago +4 / -0

(says the 3-comment post history.)

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
for_real -2 points ago +1 / -3

Sure, but these statistics are from 2019. I doubt the UN was factoring covid at all in its population models in 2019, much less covid vaccines...

AlgaeBanquet 2 points ago +3 / -1

The UN are evil af. They know what’s been planned down the road by the cabal. They are but one of their tentacles. This ain’t the place for giving the UN the benefit of the doubt. We know better.

FiatLux 0 points ago +1 / -1

i agree the boomers are probably that spike this post is stupid imho

ceegeegee 1 point ago +1 / -0

First Boomers turn 75 this year.

I work in long term care - average claim for males is age 83 and for females it is age 86. The average claim runs between 3-4 years. They fall into three groups. First group is less than one year. Second is that 3-4 year number. The balance are the long claims that tick up towards 10 years - mainly dementia.

The US has 70 million baby boomers. The Chinese have 250 million. The pattern reflects that.

Death_Metal_Patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is why.


Economic disruption because of lockdown will kill over a hundred million people. It will receive nowhere near the attention that the virus did. I promise you.

Point this out to all your liberal friends. Ask them how many millions of destitute people form impoverished countries you are willing to let starve to death because they are afraid to go outside. Make them give you a number.

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
FourRosesBourbonV2 5 points ago +6 / -1

Why is this stickied? This makes our community look bad.

Last time I called out something stupid, I was banned and called a shrill by a mod

Don't censor your community.

FiatLux 3 points ago +4 / -1

yeah when something is as lame as this it deserves scorn and ridicule not a sticky. maybe i will find some gay shit like this to post so i get a sticky too

Patriotbrah 4 points ago +8 / -4

Larger population more death. Exponential growth. Silly sticky make us look stupid

rooftoptendie 5 points ago +5 / -0

youre the one who posted this?


and now this is 'nothing to see here, please move along'. OK.

gigabump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Person, the table says 2099

Patriotbrah 0 points ago +1 / -1

yeah guy, gotta use logic. not everything is something.

FortyFiveWon 2 points ago +2 / -0


Nightcereus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fun with mathematics. Some ammunition to keep in your back pocket.


US Total deaths by year per CDC:

2013: 2,596,993 2014: 2,626,418 2015: 2,712,630 2016: 2,744,248 2017: 2,813,503 2018: 2,839,205 2019: 2,855,000 2020: 2,512,880 Through 11/14 (318 days)

Per day,

2013: 7115 2014: 7195 + 80 2015: 7431 + 236 2016: 7518 + 87 2017: 7708 + 190 2018: 7778 + 70 2019: 7821 + 43 2020: 7902 + 81

Interesting progression.

Average annual increase in deaths per day.

7902 - 7115 = 787 / 7 = 112

2019 » 2020 = 81

See, we can do numbers too.


4QN45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone needs to listen to this call https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Fda-call:f Father God, protect us from every evil.Amen🙏🙏🙏

SpoonySmalls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, boomers are starting to die and there are a lot of them.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

No - baby boomers.

SemperSupra 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the same reason they predict the planet to turn into Venus in five years: they love "predictions". They treat "predictions" as prophecies. Notice none of their predictions come true, but when they say "next year we'll all be dead" I guarantee you we will all be alive. However, they want to fear monger people with prophecies of doom.

This "prediction" will be just as accurate as Al Gore's "ice caps will melt" one.

tracybean76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone post the graph for those of us NOT on twatter? TIA!

Dark2LightPatrioy 0 points ago +3 / -3

In 2099, I think it’s safe to assume population at least doubles and we get double the death rate accordingly.

rooftoptendie 5 points ago +6 / -1

... nice post history.

so you wrote this in another comment??

>I know many people that have had the vax, not one single death. If it’s so deadly, how come not one person I know knows someone who died from the jab? I know several that died from Covid- so there’s that.

>Yes there are deaths and side affects from the vaccines, and YES there are death and side affects from China virus. Now ask yourselves this, which is greater ? I think the virus has greater deaths, respectfully.

Dark2LightPatrioy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stick to the subject- the claim is the “death rate” is going up. The final year in this hypothetical unscientific chart is 2099. That’s a whopping 69 years away. If the number of people on this planet doubles every couple of decades give or take, that would mean we’d be at 80 B people in 2099. There’s never going to be an accurate model, because assumptions have to be made about population growth and we’ve never been this high in known human history.

Therefore if the population is even 50-80 B in 2099, having a hundred million deaths is relatively small and actually a low death rate. Simple math. We need to also understand context. The stupidity of the graph claim was that the plandemic was supposed to kill more people- what idiots would launch a bio attack that ends in fucking 2099? Simple analysis would have shown that there are too many people with hysteria on our side. I am here to root out and call out the stupidity, otherwise our movement looks DUMB. And it is far from that.

We freed the slaves, we are the writers of history and we are the winners of wars. We are God’s beloved children. Sorry for being harsh my brothers, but I also am combatting the shill 3 letter agencies disinformation as well. In the end we will Win, but that doesn’t mean we don’t question or blindly follow one another. Remember to “research for yourself”- think critically.

Stay blessed.

We don’t have to agree with one another on every single topic to be part of the same family. We are the great awakening- part of that process is learning and growing together- for unity and peace (<- the prize). Not one of us is perfect so let’s respectful with one another when disagreeing.

Dark2LightPatrioy 0 points ago +1 / -1

And I spoke clearly. What’s your counter point? I spent my life in medical field not sure if I could be more clear. Death rate occurs in both vax and unvax but way higher if we remain unvax. And if this shit mutates then you will be running for a cure. Do you honestly think the thousands of people it takes to make the vax are doing it for harm ? 5,000+ People are all in on it?

Heckles -3 points ago +2 / -5

Population growth. Fuck your propaganda. How does blatantly stupid shit like this get 200+ upvotes? You guys are embarrassing sometimes.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0