Regarding Josh Merritt, an interesting development has occurred on telegram.
The following text was originally posted by Professor David Clement, regarding Josh Merritt - the post is now deleted. https://t.me/theprofessorsrecord/1945
It was later "forwarded" by Lin Wood, the telegram equivalent of 'retweeting' so to speak. That post too is now gone: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/4746
The only verification that the post was ever made, is on an account that seemingly "mirrors" every post made by Lin Wood - forwarding block removed, thus attributing all to the account itself as original poster: https://t.me/LinWoodChannel/4584
Those words are the following:
The enemy seeks to destroy those that speak truth.
Joshua Merritt is being destroyed by the SNAKE news media.
Use your discernment.
Joshua Merritt was instrumental in avoiding traps set by the enemy at the Cyber Symposium.
This angered the enemy.
The enemy lies.
History will remember Joshua Merritt as the selfless American patriot I know him to be.
P.S. - Brian Cates is a deep state hack.
The above, as stated - was originally posted by David Clement, @theprofessorsrecord as of Aug 12 at 21:05 now deleted.
It was "forwarded" by @linwoodspeakstruth as of Aug 12 at 21:14 now deleted.
It was finally "mirrored" by @LinWoodChannel as of Aug 12 at 21:22, and still exists as of this post: https://t.me/LinWoodChannel/4584
So. Josh Merritt, originally referred to as "instrumental in avoiding traps set by the enemy at the Cyber Symposium," is now to be identified as a plant?
My question is - why was the original post deleted with no clarifying addition released by Professor Clement?
Are we now recognizing Josh Merritt as a plant?
I am not satisfied with the claim that "history will remember Joshua Merritt as the selfless American patriot I know him to be," simply evaporating into thin air, with absolutely no context afterward, while he is now being referred to as a traitor.
Apparently, I now must screenshot all "telegram" posts from people I believe I can "trust" at this point, because they will be deleted without explanation. I find this very unsatisfactory. If you are wrong - own up to it.
When I say a single word, I stake myself to it. My word, thanks to Professor Clement, now bleeds me - because I took his post at face value. Now, that post has been removed.
I do not know what is "true," or what is "false," at this point, regarding Joshua Merritt. I do not know if those telegram posts were deleted as part of a larger operation to bait the [DS] into continuing to use Joshua Merritt as a feeder of false information to [DS] or us. In short, I know not whether he is a "good guy" or a "bad guy" anymore.
As I said before - I am not satisfied regarding this situation.
I get that you're not satisfied, but I sure as hell do appreciate you putting in the legwork, fren. o7.
Following along...
Ehh, more legwork here:
https://rumble.com/vl8n47-mike-lindell-clears-up-cyber-symposium-controversy.html
Mike Lindell himself dispels all confusion, flags Merritt as a bad guy outright.
I supposed this telegram post is the Professor's admission that he was incorrect:
https://t.me/theprofessorsrecord/2002
It does not dispel the original statement, however - that "Joshua Merritt was instrumental in avoiding traps set by the enemy at the Cyber Symposium."
Sometimes it feels as if I'm sitting at the table by myself.
Well, we will find out tonight when we get to listen to Josh’s 1 hour and 20 minute phone call with the press where he lies and tries to discredit the cyber symposium.
As far as I know it's only on frank speech - is there something that does not request a phone number as an alternative?
It looks like it’s on here too: https://lindelltv.com/
Watching currently.
Sounds pretty solid that this Josh Merritt is a solid fucking traitor and a rat.
Either that, or the opposite is the truth. I don't know anymore - someone's gaslighting is all I know.
According to the phone call, the opposite isn’t the truth.
What sells me is Fox isn’t even covering it. Speaks volumes.
From now on, it’s Mike at 11 and 6 central for me. Rest of the news is shit.
The part about Brian Cates is...odd..
All I can say is that I've not had a good feeling about Cates in general before this.
Any reason why?
America First Audit telegram channel is now openly attacking Lindell, and lifting up Merritt.
Either the AFA telegram is a DS op, or Lindell is. A few weeks ago I would have said that was an easy determination...
Decided to just "bold" the pertinent replies made by AFA telegram:
So basically, AFA admits they don't know anything either.
Sigh...
So much complexity behind the symposium. Thank goodness for Q.
Look - I was in youth prison for a long time and got into Grisham novels etc. and I read all the time about spy's who were triple crossing etc. and maybe Merritt is a secret white hat that the black hats sent to 'infiltrate' Lindell and then Clement's knew he was a double agent and posted that nice comment and Lindel's team said DELETE IT NOW so the black hats didn't get wind that Merritt was a double agent?
Black hats aren't the only one paying off RHINO's like Crenshaw or have always secretly been in control of Fox News etc. - we have people inside THEIR systems working for us too surely.
I considered that before I made this post. Lindell seems to be in the dark about it, either way, if it is the case.
If they want the cataloguing of this information in this forum deleted, they can feel free to message me, and I'll be glad to continue with the same narrative Lindell is currently on track with. Or, I can shut up - whatever they so prefer.
Of course not - we're not the libtards. We want discourse. Continue to speak your mind even if I or others disagree with you fren - it happens to all of us all the time. That's what makes free speech so important.
Listening to CannCon, who has had Josh on his podcast and may have him on when he is ready to talk.
He is standing up for Josh, but not questioning Lindell's patriotism.
Why did Josh run to the media instead of working the chain of command? He violated an NDA in doing so. Was Lindell somehow threatening him if he called BS on him?
I have to agree it's all a little confusing.
How many of those are fake Telegram accounts?
https://t.me/LinWoodChannel/ is the fake.
However: It mirrors everything the real Lin Wood says in his telegram, so I have no idea how fake.
Thus far, it has not been used to circulate statements not connected to Lin Wood himself.
So - it's 'fake,' but useful in that it is mirroring all of his posts - even posts forwarded, and doesn't make false statements not attributable to Lin Wood or what he has forwarded. Lin's a lawyer, he might have two accounts - one for posts, one for archiving. I don't know.
As far as David Clement's account? Lin Wood 'forwards' from it, so I'd assume it's real.
Since we're on the topic of "fake telegram accounts," we can also go on to General Flynn's account, @realgenflynn: which even had an audio clip from Flynn to prove it was legitimate: https://t.me/RealGenFlynn/29
Even the fake ones seem to include 'some' real posts from the person's other accounts to try to look legitimate. Then they can intersperse whatever they want in between and people will believe or be confused. It is getting tiresome trying to sort through for what is real.
Amen to that. I decided to <mostly> take the weekend off to relax instead of following any of this (yesterday gone the whole day) - and the entire playing field changes.