I worked in the Biopharmaceutical industry for the better part of 20 years and this is absolutely unheard of! A drug introduced less than 8 months ago with no control group receiving full FDA approval?!?! I worked on drugs for 2 1/2 - 3 years before they would approve a drug.
Exactly. I feel like this is an incredibly desperate move on their part. If they do this I pray it's the snowball rolling down hill that brings the pharma cabal crashing down in a huge avalanche.
I believe this is more news cycle theater. I don't believe the FDA will approve the mRNA jab. I'll wait and see.
There's too many legal problems with the FDA approval. Number one problem is that it is not legally a 'vaccine'. This may mean that Pfizer will not have immunity against lawsuits. The Act providing immunity to vaccine companies defines in detail what constitutes a 'vaccine'. Friends, a gene therapy injection doesn't fit ANY of the requirements of a 'vaccine'.
Merriam-Webster and even the CDC may have changed their definition on their website to fool the public. But, the definition for 'vaccine' is provided for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) encoded as 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. This has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
I tried a bit to look things up. The code you cited was about liability.
The NCVIA, despite it's title, seems to do anything but protect the children. All it protects is the manufacturers. Got to downplay the negative and keep that cash cow producing!
The VICP (vaccine injury compensation program) was established after lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers threatened to cause vaccine shortages and reduce vaccination rates.
It does seem they have to comply with some regulations:
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title
I looked up 'NCVIA vaccine definition' and got next to nothing. This blurb is from Wikipedia:
The NCVIA requires that all health care providers who administer vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b and varicella must provide a Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) to the vaccine recipient, their parent or legal guardian prior to ...
This is from the CDC:
The vaccines and toxoids to which these requirements apply follow: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP); pertussis vaccine (P); measles, mumps, and rubella single-antigen vaccines and combination vaccines (MMR, MR); diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DT); tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td); ...
So I was unsuccessful in finding a vaccine definition in the Act, not that there isn't one, mind you. I did come across a few pdf's that I didn't download or read.
From what I did see, it looks like they were pretty specific in naming diseases/vaccines. If they need Congress to add covid, will they? Or will they just try to reinterpret the words already there?
Either way, it's the people who are going to get the short end of the stick!
All Statutes/Codes/Laws have a 'glossary' for definitions. Because you didn't find it does not mean it's not there. If words were not encoded in law, the Statutes/Codes/Laws would be meaningless. Believe me, the definition of 'vaccine' is there and cannot cannot be changed willy-nilly. There has to be checks and balances. Otherwise, the word 'up' would mean 'down', etc.
"From what I did see, it looks like they were pretty specific in naming diseases/vaccines. If they need Congress to add covid, will they? Or will they just try to reinterpret the words already there?"
A very good question. I tend to believe, it would have to go through a registrar of Congress to change it. It would make sense to me that both parties would have to agree on the change and a vote would ensue. Furthermore, it would need to be approved by the Senate as well.
Because you didn't find it does not mean it's not there.
I did admit that.
I was unsuccessful in finding a vaccine definition in the Act, not that there isn't one, mind you.
I found some pdf's and I think one was of the Act itself. It probably was in there, but could not readily find quotes of it online. I'm technologically-challenged, on a dumb little tablet and can't download much.
the definition of 'vaccine' is there and cannot cannot be changed willy-nilly
I'm glad to hear that. If it does have to be bipartisan and go through both houses, how fast or how slow that happens will say something in and of itself. I guess we'll have to wait and see.....
More distraction from Arizona audit lol. Only problem is only far lefty liberals give two shits about covid anymore which is maybe 10% of the country. Everyone else is completely over this scamDEMic
Words matter! How exactly does “aiming to” impact this context? Forgive me if I reserve my panic and outrage until after it is actually announced “full approval”.
I’m thinking the same. I’m wondering if somehow they’ll force it in FL too next though...
We may need to regroup to a friendly area no matter what because by our sheer numbers alone they won't be able to force shit on us.
I worked in the Biopharmaceutical industry for the better part of 20 years and this is absolutely unheard of! A drug introduced less than 8 months ago with no control group receiving full FDA approval?!?! I worked on drugs for 2 1/2 - 3 years before they would approve a drug.
Exactly. I feel like this is an incredibly desperate move on their part. If they do this I pray it's the snowball rolling down hill that brings the pharma cabal crashing down in a huge avalanche.
Big pharma, FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO, all of them.
I hope this wakes up the part of the medical industry that have been sleep walking right through this whole catastrophe
I live in a rural area where people eat roadkill and clean their guns more than themselves. Good luck getting us all lol
can i be your neighbor? lol
Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣
Comment of the week for me :)
You gonna finish that badger soup?
Shouldnt it be studied for at least 5 years?
FDA sticking the final nail in their own coffin with this
Yeah, this is for all the marbles.
I believe this is more news cycle theater. I don't believe the FDA will approve the mRNA jab. I'll wait and see.
There's too many legal problems with the FDA approval. Number one problem is that it is not legally a 'vaccine'. This may mean that Pfizer will not have immunity against lawsuits. The Act providing immunity to vaccine companies defines in detail what constitutes a 'vaccine'. Friends, a gene therapy injection doesn't fit ANY of the requirements of a 'vaccine'.
They'll do what they always do and just change the definitions.
Merriam-Webster and even the CDC may have changed their definition on their website to fool the public. But, the definition for 'vaccine' is provided for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) encoded as 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. This has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
That is definitely good to know, thank you!
Your welcome. This is my interpretation after looking into it. Please, look this up for yourself. Prove me wrong. Vet everything.
I tried a bit to look things up. The code you cited was about liability.
The NCVIA, despite it's title, seems to do anything but protect the children. All it protects is the manufacturers. Got to downplay the negative and keep that cash cow producing!
It does seem they have to comply with some regulations:
I looked up 'NCVIA vaccine definition' and got next to nothing. This blurb is from Wikipedia:
This is from the CDC:
So I was unsuccessful in finding a vaccine definition in the Act, not that there isn't one, mind you. I did come across a few pdf's that I didn't download or read.
From what I did see, it looks like they were pretty specific in naming diseases/vaccines. If they need Congress to add covid, will they? Or will they just try to reinterpret the words already there?
Either way, it's the people who are going to get the short end of the stick!
Thanks for your research and efforts here.
All Statutes/Codes/Laws have a 'glossary' for definitions. Because you didn't find it does not mean it's not there. If words were not encoded in law, the Statutes/Codes/Laws would be meaningless. Believe me, the definition of 'vaccine' is there and cannot cannot be changed willy-nilly. There has to be checks and balances. Otherwise, the word 'up' would mean 'down', etc.
A very good question. I tend to believe, it would have to go through a registrar of Congress to change it. It would make sense to me that both parties would have to agree on the change and a vote would ensue. Furthermore, it would need to be approved by the Senate as well.
I did admit that.
I found some pdf's and I think one was of the Act itself. It probably was in there, but could not readily find quotes of it online. I'm technologically-challenged, on a dumb little tablet and can't download much.
I'm glad to hear that. If it does have to be bipartisan and go through both houses, how fast or how slow that happens will say something in and of itself. I guess we'll have to wait and see.....
These scumbags are looking to commit not just one, but ALL the crimes against humanity before they get rounded up.
More distraction from Arizona audit lol. Only problem is only far lefty liberals give two shits about covid anymore which is maybe 10% of the country. Everyone else is completely over this scamDEMic
yep FDA is infallible never did they ever approve anything that was dangerous
whoops what is this
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21507989/
https://helix.northwestern.edu/article/thalidomide-tragedy-lessons-drug-safety-and-regulation
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-requests-removal-all-ranitidine-products-zantac-market
https://www.northpointrecovery.com/blog/history-quaaludes-methaqualone-abuse-addiction/
https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/cylert.html
https://affiliates.legalexaminer.com/health/vioxx-killed-half-a-million-the-facts-are-grim/
Fact is FDA approval means as about as much as CDC/WHO recommendations, jack shit
https://www.brighteon.com/c39c458e-70f1-4bcf-9ae7-17e5e92bbd99
So this means insurance and life insurance companies now need to pay out for vaxx injuries and deaths?
So? This is the hill to die on!
And they will.
Words matter! How exactly does “aiming to” impact this context? Forgive me if I reserve my panic and outrage until after it is actually announced “full approval”.
Is this the precipice yet?
may be a dumb question, but if approved does the Nuremberg code still apply?
That’s how you know it’s safe
Fake news...
*God help them. They will be eradicated off the face of the earth. They have no idea.
Agree. People need to wake up and realize we have been in WW3 for the last 18 months and respond accordingly.