Multiple times and has "nevermind" tatted on his chest. He'd make more sense if he just came out and said "I think my dad should've gotten paid more than $200".
Its has to be for the made for the “purient interest”...meaning the photo is meant to be arousing to arouse sexual desire. Its the same reason the famous photo of that naked girl in Vietnam isnt CP.
In what instance is a naked infant who isn't yours ever acceptable especially in the public square?
What thoughts the enemy bombards me with are out of my control. It's what I choose to do with them that matters and most often times I simply let them fade back into the dark from were they came.
In what instance is a naked infant who isn't yours ever acceptable especially in the public square?
It is commonplace (in the country I reside) for infants to play in and swim naked; paddling and community pools etc. Seeing a naked infant is a non-issue for me, just like it would be seeing a woman nursing a child. If you're offended by either the only reason I can fathom is that your brain is (hopefully unconsciously) linking a sexual component to the scene. Why else would you feel unease?
He's still chasing that money, I see.
🐸👌
Top kek
Meh. He recreated the iconic photo himself.
Multiple times and has "nevermind" tatted on his chest. He'd make more sense if he just came out and said "I think my dad should've gotten paid more than $200".
Meh.
This guy thinks his baby penis helped Nirvana sell records? Lol.
I dont think thats really the point...
Because muh "art" excuse
Wonder if his parents are defendants too, since they obviously allowed this.
And this is why if you're going to put a naked baby on your album cover, you just use a photo of yourself. Hat Tip: Sebadoh - Bake Sale - Lou Barlow
Isn't CP still CP if its CP of your own PeePee?
Well to be fair, there's no peen. Just rump.
Its has to be for the made for the “purient interest”...meaning the photo is meant to be arousing to arouse sexual desire. Its the same reason the famous photo of that naked girl in Vietnam isnt CP.
He was angry about being defined by something he had no control over.
I feel his pain.
Guess he can't sue his parents, the primary reason his pic was taken...they'd kick him out of their basement.
And to think that if he simply didn't tell people from now on they'd never know he was the naked baby.
I actually think there may be more to this story and it may be drawing attention to the Music Industry for upcoming reveals. RKelly is also in court.
David Geffen was involved with Nirvana. Remember, the Oblama's, Oprah, Hanks and Springsteen gathered on his yacht right after the 2016 Election.
"If you're offended by this you must be a closet pedophile."
Or I just don't want to see baby penises at the music store.
If you see a naked infant and feel anything other than neutral, I'd say there's something odd going on in your subconscious.
In what instance is a naked infant who isn't yours ever acceptable especially in the public square?
What thoughts the enemy bombards me with are out of my control. It's what I choose to do with them that matters and most often times I simply let them fade back into the dark from were they came.
It is commonplace (in the country I reside) for infants to play in and swim naked; paddling and community pools etc. Seeing a naked infant is a non-issue for me, just like it would be seeing a woman nursing a child. If you're offended by either the only reason I can fathom is that your brain is (hopefully unconsciously) linking a sexual component to the scene. Why else would you feel unease?
"Statute of Limitations", jump in front of a car if you want to win the Litigation Lottery.