Ok. It’s 2000, you’re Donald Trump, a man who loves America and loves owning real estate in NYC. The twin towers are up for sale, an iconic American landmark. Full of Abestos, the whole damn things would need rebuilt….not a good investment. So what was Larry thinking when he bought them????
Was he planning to “pull them” all 3?
Did Trump know as he saw the events of 9/11 unfold that it was possibly something sinister?
If the cabal has the power to let/not let people be president, it surprises me they let Trump be president in 2016 even with Pence as VP. They made a HUGE mistake LMAO. I bet they regret that now
This. And they underestimated him; and they thought the rigging was enough; and they had no idea that Q was just around the corner about to fuck them all over.
He said very plainly on live TV that he had building seven pulled. Said it was due to damage. Seemed reasonable at the time, now it’s a conspiracy theory.
Maybe he was warned by George Bush, who happened to be at an elementary school being read to by the children, when he was informed of the attack. If you watch the video, he acknowledges the message with a nod and a small smile/smirk. Mission accomplished!
The ENTIRE EVIL EMPIRE needs to GO DOWN..."BILLIONAIRE"
Your consent to what they suggest is what sustains the entire evil empire. In this case...your consent to evaluate the suggested value of money by choice to believe it being worth "billions" is what makes larry lucky.
i'm pretty sure the entire point of this is that he was so "lucky" because, incidentally, just that day, him and his entire family had things happen that prevented them from being in the twin towers when the shit went down..
You're not "pretty sure"; you consented to a contradicting narrative suggested to you by the same source that suggested you the mainstream narrative. The first narrative (9/11 terrorist attack) suggested puts those who chose to believe it against those who chose to not believe it. The resulting conflict is called "reason" and the whole operating tool of control is called "division by suggestion".
After the conflict of reason was establish and the majority divided into reasoning about true versus false; the few start to suggest contradictions to both sides within reason, which is why the believers get "9/11 was an inside job and dancing israelis" and the non-believers get "lucky larry; inflated airplane tires; building seven did not kill itself; staples boxcutters; Osama Ben Obama etc."
The sustenance of reason through suggested contradictions is called "talmudic reasoning".
The trick underneath all this is that our free will of choice represents a reaction to balance; which our parasites exploit by deceiving us through suggestions to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice.
When others suggest to believe or not-believe anything; they use their free will of choice to offer a suggested choice to your free will of choice, and when you consent; you choose to ignore your choice within balance for submission to their choice in ignorance of balance.
he is rich
The so called rich don't pay with money; because they already own everything they tricked others to believe costs money. The majority of our species is defined by the few as being within world wide poverty aka not having money, and yet breeding like cockroaches; while those who chase money are being ethnically cleansed through "Replacement Migration" based on insufficient birthrates (according to the few).
Should I mention that no other life-forms use money to sustain themselves within reality? Those who chase money are ignoring this blissfully; while complaining about the struggle to survive; which they believe is about getting access to "muh precious" money.
The trick underneath that one is that the highest value in ALL existence represents ONEs choice to evaluate it. Balance holds ALL value; choice reacts by evaluation for balancing. The suggested value of money by others a) ignores balance of value; b) devalues the choice of evaluation of those who consent to it and c) allows the few who suggest substitute value to the many; through the consent of the many to define value for the many; which they used usury for to accumulate all consented to value into the hands of the few; while now putting it all behind a paywall of compliance for the many.
Compliance to the few as rulers? Nah; they already are. It's compliance to self destruction for access to participation in reality...a reality the many are ignoring with their own free will of choice.
2011?
Lol he survived the attacks by being 10 years late to work
😂
Ok. It’s 2000, you’re Donald Trump, a man who loves America and loves owning real estate in NYC. The twin towers are up for sale, an iconic American landmark. Full of Abestos, the whole damn things would need rebuilt….not a good investment. So what was Larry thinking when he bought them???? Was he planning to “pull them” all 3?
Did Trump know as he saw the events of 9/11 unfold that it was possibly something sinister?
I quickly looked up Trump 2000, to get an idea of where he was at professionally at that time and came up with him putting together a “presidential committee” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_2000_presidential_campaign
When did this movie start?
👍
He wanted Oprah Winfrey as his VP? Dafuq?
Cabal only lets you be President if your VP is one of theirs i.e. cabal. He was probably trolling them even back then
If the cabal has the power to let/not let people be president, it surprises me they let Trump be president in 2016 even with Pence as VP. They made a HUGE mistake LMAO. I bet they regret that now
They never thought she would lose.
This. And they underestimated him; and they thought the rigging was enough; and they had no idea that Q was just around the corner about to fuck them all over.
I know, everyone told me he was racist…
He said very plainly on live TV that he had building seven pulled. Said it was due to damage. Seemed reasonable at the time, now it’s a conspiracy theory.
How about building 8?
You know someone born after 2001 wrote this.
"PULL IT"
September 11, 2001
Not 2011
Maybe he was warned by George Bush, who happened to be at an elementary school being read to by the children, when he was informed of the attack. If you watch the video, he acknowledges the message with a nod and a small smile/smirk. Mission accomplished!
Quite the... neck... on that daughter.
And quite the Schnoz on both of them
Don't even need to consult the "early life" on those 2
Here' the very second he became so lucky. Notice the explosions on consecutive floors: WTC7 Coming Down
Your consent to what they suggest is what sustains the entire evil empire. In this case...your consent to evaluate the suggested value of money by choice to believe it being worth "billions" is what makes larry lucky.
You're not "pretty sure"; you consented to a contradicting narrative suggested to you by the same source that suggested you the mainstream narrative. The first narrative (9/11 terrorist attack) suggested puts those who chose to believe it against those who chose to not believe it. The resulting conflict is called "reason" and the whole operating tool of control is called "division by suggestion".
After the conflict of reason was establish and the majority divided into reasoning about true versus false; the few start to suggest contradictions to both sides within reason, which is why the believers get "9/11 was an inside job and dancing israelis" and the non-believers get "lucky larry; inflated airplane tires; building seven did not kill itself; staples boxcutters; Osama Ben Obama etc."
The sustenance of reason through suggested contradictions is called "talmudic reasoning".
The trick underneath all this is that our free will of choice represents a reaction to balance; which our parasites exploit by deceiving us through suggestions to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice.
When others suggest to believe or not-believe anything; they use their free will of choice to offer a suggested choice to your free will of choice, and when you consent; you choose to ignore your choice within balance for submission to their choice in ignorance of balance.
The so called rich don't pay with money; because they already own everything they tricked others to believe costs money. The majority of our species is defined by the few as being within world wide poverty aka not having money, and yet breeding like cockroaches; while those who chase money are being ethnically cleansed through "Replacement Migration" based on insufficient birthrates (according to the few).
Should I mention that no other life-forms use money to sustain themselves within reality? Those who chase money are ignoring this blissfully; while complaining about the struggle to survive; which they believe is about getting access to "muh precious" money.
The trick underneath that one is that the highest value in ALL existence represents ONEs choice to evaluate it. Balance holds ALL value; choice reacts by evaluation for balancing. The suggested value of money by others a) ignores balance of value; b) devalues the choice of evaluation of those who consent to it and c) allows the few who suggest substitute value to the many; through the consent of the many to define value for the many; which they used usury for to accumulate all consented to value into the hands of the few; while now putting it all behind a paywall of compliance for the many.
Compliance to the few as rulers? Nah; they already are. It's compliance to self destruction for access to participation in reality...a reality the many are ignoring with their own free will of choice.
Is he still alive?
asking the real questions
Lucky Larry has a rope waiting for him!
Get psychiatric help.