I know that there is no way a lightweight airplane made of hollow aluminum could ever slice through the thick steel beams of the WTC buildings.
Yet, there are very convincing videos of that happening.
So what really happened?
-
The planes were photoshopped.
-
The planes were not passenger planes but specially made aircraft.
-
The buildings had some steel beams strategically removed in advance.
I know some of you have studied this a lot. What really happened?
2 planes, 3 buildings
2 planes, 7 buildings and thermite.
One of the stories going around was they had closed down the WTCs at some point before 9/11 to "install fiber-optic equipment", but this is when they allegedly instead cut crucial i-beams so they would fail when they set off the mini nukes on 9/11.
https://newspunch.com/911-tower-had-power-turned-off-for-36-hours-weekend-before-attack/
I remember seeing at the time pictures of those huge i-beams with perfect angled slices in them like someone had cut through it rather than what you would imagine a bent or broken steel beams would look like.
Yes, I remember that too. I also recall hearing that a Bush brother was in charge of security at the WTC complex during this time but I really don't know if that turned out to be true or not.
CGI, controlled detonation...crank up the military industrial complex money laundering. Airline stocks short sold 2 weeks prior. Also insurance policy setup 2 weeks prior that paid out huge numbers.
Trump had his very accurate opinion that day as well... He knew then, just like he always knows now!! It was on this day I realized how patriotic I was and I felt as if the country was united for a short time. I stand by this theory: explosives in building, weakened structure, preplanning from within. Pentagon hit was a missile launched at street level,
About say's it, it was all an inside job...
I'll give you the explosive part at the towers, it is seriously the only way the buildings could have come down at the speed and way they did.
The Pentagon, a rogue submarine missile launch is my theory, any of the air defence's surrounding that area back then would have destroyed an aircraft should they have chosen too.
You know the infamous parking lot video footage that the FB eye released? What many may not know is that a software engineer studied the data carefully, and he could see that between frames 23 - 27 it had been cut and reversed so that grey squiggle was moved, most likely to cut out the one frame where a small missile would be seen.
Some folks believe it was holograms with explosions inside the building set to go off as the planes "hit" the building.
Why No 7 ? What was it holding that needed to destroyed?
Information on the $2 Trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld had announced went missing a day prior to 9/11. Both Building 7 and the section of the Pentagon that got hit held the same incriminating evidence.
Yes I have seen that, thanks for confirmation. So for all, I was a furious crying Patriot over what was done to us by the ‘terrorists’. And only recently the last few years because of this Great Awakening, have come around to the realization that 911 was 100% done by our ‘government’ and its DS allies as a total inside job. Fucking eh
In fact every impact point of both the towers and the Pentagon struck at the very points critical data was housed. If you research the floor levels that were hit and the area the Pentagon was hit, ALL had important data on the missing 2.3 trillion DOD budget, the Enron scandal, BCCI scandal and much more!
As in the Pentagon, it had just literally finished an extensive renovation to make the area stronger, the hole left in the building PRIOR to it falling down was only about 16 - 20ft in diameter, and left a smaller exit hole in the inner wing (either C or D I can't remember without checking) of about 8ft diameter. The offical story was that somehow the entire aircraft melted to a liquid slug, went around many of the supporting pillars and brickwork, before reforming to a slug to make the exit hole on that inner wing! Serious, that's what they say happened to a 100 ton airliner! Each engine is about 6 ton of steel and titanium!
Building 7 also housed some very interesting agencies, and I believe was supposed to be hit by flight 93 but something went wrong, so they had to bring it down with explosives pre planted and tried to blame it falling at free fall due to a few small office fires. The only time in history were steel framed structures fell due to fire and they all happened on the same day!
Evidence implicating GW Bush in the Enron scandal.
https://www.cabaltimes.com/2012/03/13/enron-911-link/
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/connect-enron-dots-bush/
Correct.
I've always liked the documentary, "Loose Change, Secend Edition" for possible explanations of how it was done. Link is to Final Cut version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEZAXFbAnbA
It also got us the Dept. of Homeland Security and The Patriot Act.
I cant really explain to you what happened but something has been telling me about 9/11 that I think we are about to find out. I get a weird intuition that this 9/11 could reveal some truths that have been hidden from the public.
It's hard to explain but many many times whether morning or night time, I always seem to check the time at exactly 9:11. It could just be a coincidence but it's been going on for years now. That as well as 12:34. It's quite strange and don't really know what to think of it.
https://qalerts.app/?n=911
https://qalerts.app/?n=1234
Could all be irrelevant but figured this is the best time to post it.
The planes crumbled and folded as they hit . Explosives set off right as the planes hit to make it look legitimate. Israeli art project had the whole previous year to line the building with the charges.
But videos show the planes sinking into the buildings.
The planes definitely sank into the buildings but they didn’t cause the explosions. I doubt mythbusters would be up to the challenge lol but I’m sure their would be a way to replicate it somehow. Maybe that was cgi or altered video? Who knows? Too many dead witnesses and video deleted to trust anything anymore—it’s all been altered IMO
No way aluminum wings could sink through steel beams. Have you seen how thick those were?
https://www.google.com/search?q=world+trade+center+cross&client=ms-android-mpcs-us-revc&prmd=imnxv&sxsrf=AOaemvIWD2Pe1350vdQVM0it-0n7wdiJtA:1630717741803&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi4ger9kOTyAhWVQc0KHWWSCuMQ_AUoAXoECAMQAQ&biw=412&bih=772&dpr=1.75#imgrc=ma-i0S-OxVvQqM
https://youtu.be/F4CX-9lkRMQ
Not exactly the same but you get the idea.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z5jV44aubIM7/
The thick steel beams were in the center of the building. The outside was relatively thin metal and glass.
When the second plane hit the south tower, it slid/rotated past the center of the building to the plane's right.
A very smart business man said the opposite
"the World Trade Center was different from other edifices in that most other buildings (at least during the time of the interview) are built with steel on the inside surrounding the elevator shafts, but the towers were built with steel from the outside, “which is the strongest structure you can have. It was almost like a can of soup.”
https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-september-11-interview-214134740.html
Best video I've seen on 9/11. It's long.
9/11 The Great American Psy Opera
https://youtu.be/cyCXiX1f2yw
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PrB0KhrgRM88/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z5jV44aubIM7/
You might find this interesting -
Article explaining theory it was a nuclear demolition written by a nuclear explosion expert:
https://sophias-correction.weebly.com/wtc-nuclear-demolition.html
Another perspective:
https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7
https://benthamopen.com/DOWNLOAD-PDF/TOCPJ-2-7/
Example of what can happen to those who don't embrace the narrative and ask too many questions:
http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/geopolitics/the-murder-of-beverly-eckert/