It is time to do something about this, by the people that are supposed to be able to something about it. They can also keep going on the other audits, we will/should find they will turn out very similarly to this one.
This is such a new story that I haven't had a chance to look at it. I just watched what she said on the War Room. That's all I know.
I would need to look at the actual supporting documents to determine whether it's a convincing canvass, but if you held a gun to my head right now demanding an answer, I'd say that any sort of "secret' canvass done by a partisan group is not going to be taken seriously, at least until we can analyze their actual methodologies and documents to see how their data was collected.
I will, but probably not for a day or two. I tend to have the same 48 hour rule that many here believe is necessary for waiting out the initial chaos of new stories. Remind me if it comes up again.
I was specifically asked to contribute by another user. If you aren't interested in my thoughts, you are not obligated to read anything I write. You don't have to be part of this conversation.
I feel like this is an issue you would understand with some perspective.
How would you have reacted in 2017 to liberal canvassers showing up at your door, secretly, and checking whether you were a registered voter?
You can assume I’ve read how people here entertain the notion of greeting government officials checking vaccine status.
How much faith would you have in the claims of some state official who says they have definitely proven Trump stole the election because they conducted a secret canvas?
Would you say, “yeah, I need a more reliable source or to see your absolutely flawless data before I start decertifying Constitutionally-protected certifications in an attempt to replace the sitting POTUS”?
That’s all I’m saying. You wouldn’t accept it, rightly. I am not accepting it based only on the word of someone with a vested interest in reinstating Trump.
maricopa canvas -
173,000 votes cast by mail were never counted ( all Trump for sure )
96,000 votes counted but the person did not live where they said they did so made up votes for dipshit
https://canvass50.com/
Why not just say that before?
Homeboy has a taste for the theatrical.
Bombs are dropping about this on Bannon right now... CM must have had some insider info on it and dropped that cryptic crumb yesterday.
this
Larpmonkeyz gotta larp as usual. Larping is what a Larpmonkeyz does best.
Found the wet blanket... sticky
Found Larpmonkeyz’s boyfriend. I bet you two look cute together.
Get bent Deborah
And this canvassing does not consider vote flipping and skewing by computer
The 3rd part of the tripartite analysis aka the machines.. vote machines, routers, audit logs, access logs etc will cover any computer shenanigans
The canvassing will catch and has caught ghost votes/lost votes in maricopa that can be looked for at the machine level.
Yes. Add them all up and it equals fraud on such a massive scale as to Biblical in scope!
Why is he such a freaking drama queen? I cannot stand that kind of crap.
You're familiar with his parents right? 😉
Also, PSBSR = 322 in jewish gematria
Skull and bones
thats a boom...........now do something about it
It is time to do something about this, by the people that are supposed to be able to something about it. They can also keep going on the other audits, we will/should find they will turn out very similarly to this one.
This is such a new story that I haven't had a chance to look at it. I just watched what she said on the War Room. That's all I know.
I would need to look at the actual supporting documents to determine whether it's a convincing canvass, but if you held a gun to my head right now demanding an answer, I'd say that any sort of "secret' canvass done by a partisan group is not going to be taken seriously, at least until we can analyze their actual methodologies and documents to see how their data was collected.
I will, but probably not for a day or two. I tend to have the same 48 hour rule that many here believe is necessary for waiting out the initial chaos of new stories. Remind me if it comes up again.
Dude, you will repeat whatever the corporations tell you to repeat and you know it. Everything you said here is fluff.
I was specifically asked to contribute by another user. If you aren't interested in my thoughts, you are not obligated to read anything I write. You don't have to be part of this conversation.
Your opinion is useless anyway considering you're a shill.
How on Earth could you possibly reach that conclusion from what I wrote?
I am actually interested in a precise answer. Which specific words of mine planted that notion in your mind?
I feel like this is an issue you would understand with some perspective.
How would you have reacted in 2017 to liberal canvassers showing up at your door, secretly, and checking whether you were a registered voter?
You can assume I’ve read how people here entertain the notion of greeting government officials checking vaccine status.
How much faith would you have in the claims of some state official who says they have definitely proven Trump stole the election because they conducted a secret canvas?
Would you say, “yeah, I need a more reliable source or to see your absolutely flawless data before I start decertifying Constitutionally-protected certifications in an attempt to replace the sitting POTUS”?
That’s all I’m saying. You wouldn’t accept it, rightly. I am not accepting it based only on the word of someone with a vested interest in reinstating Trump.