Becerra contradicts himself in the hearing. First says he’s not familiar with the study in Israel and then later says they’ve read every study in the world.
But one thing I notice Paul say that I don’t like, is he’s talking about not having mandates for people that have natural immunity. He should be arguing against ALL mandates. We should all be given a choice and not feel pressure from the government or your employer.
He was trying to get some sort of contrition from Becerra - baby steps as it were. You don't get someone to change their position by throwing them over the wall, but by breaking the wall down one brick at a time.
Well, since a great many are asymptomatic who the hell knows who has natural immunity? So if RP gets this “exemption” acknowledged the mandates die. Who among us knows whether we have natural immunity?
Antibodies don’t continue to circulate in the bloodstream indefinitely after infection. We have memory T cells that start producing antibodies again when exposed to another virus that’s similar. It’s in the bone marrow so even if you draw blood you won’t find it.
Realizing that he was called out on not having scientific nor medical credentials personally he deflected away from his knowledge and asserted that his nebulous team of scientists have reviewed every study available. Typical beauracratic bullshit answers.
Becerra contradicts himself in the hearing. First says he’s not familiar with the study in Israel and then later says they’ve read every study in the world.
But one thing I notice Paul say that I don’t like, is he’s talking about not having mandates for people that have natural immunity. He should be arguing against ALL mandates. We should all be given a choice and not feel pressure from the government or your employer.
He was trying to get some sort of contrition from Becerra - baby steps as it were. You don't get someone to change their position by throwing them over the wall, but by breaking the wall down one brick at a time.
unless you thrown em hard enough to throw em through the wall
If your goal is to convert, and you kill, you've failed the mission.
If your goal is to kill, then you don't need the wall at all :P
Yes.
Like exposing Americans to the Big Lie.
Well, since a great many are asymptomatic who the hell knows who has natural immunity? So if RP gets this “exemption” acknowledged the mandates die. Who among us knows whether we have natural immunity?
Hold a covid party... Like our parents used to have for chicken pox. Pad out therapeutics to everyone who comes.
This is exactly the point! Nice Catch, OXRanger!
I have cell immunity. Easy but expensive to test and certify. Regardless, vaxxoids have more rights than me. Clown world.
No thanks, I wont be taking any tests.
They just take blood - nothing nefarious.
Antibodies are not detectable after a few months.
And no. No mandates. Period.
Antibodies don’t continue to circulate in the bloodstream indefinitely after infection. We have memory T cells that start producing antibodies again when exposed to another virus that’s similar. It’s in the bone marrow so even if you draw blood you won’t find it.
Question.
If other tests can't detect the virus, then how does an antibody test detect the antibodies for a virus that other tests can't detect?
Is it still possible to get an antibody test? Last thing I heard the FDA had made a rule against letting people get tested.
Realizing that he was called out on not having scientific nor medical credentials personally he deflected away from his knowledge and asserted that his nebulous team of scientists have reviewed every study available. Typical beauracratic bullshit answers.
Rand Paul should have told him to send someone he could actually question. But Rand just wanted to give a speech.
They... did their own research?
EVERYBODY has natural immunity. It's part of being human.
Unless ... they take a mystery drug that might damage their immune system.