This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.
He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.
Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.” The claim he didn’t show up the second day because he’s “on a lot of medication” is concerning to say the least.
Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Crowdstrike?
Servers.
SR.
JA.Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q”
I keep leaning toward the conclusion that they don’t want him extradited; he’d be theoretically safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him. I sometimes wonder if Assange arriving by plane on US soil would be what forces the military to take control, because they know he can’t fall into BH hands. If they have the source files, they can expose it all.
Full tin foil makes me think Assange’s wife is his handler, as she ~happened to know the languages necessary when his legal team was in crunch time for charges against him.~
Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.
I mean is it saying he was innocent me that he didn’t deserve the suspension of rights he got under the “Enemy Combatant” crap?
He looked gaunt and tired. He did not appear in court, the judges explained, because he was receiving a “high dose of medication.”
Assange is being forced BZ. He’s being psychologically tortured. BZ is a chemical agent that basically slowly lobotomizes you into insanity. They’re clearly trying to kill him in prison so they can call it suicide.
After he was observed pacing his cell until he collapsed, punching himself in the face, and banging his head against the wall, he was transferred for several months to the medical wing of the Belmarsh prison. Prison authorities found “half of a razor blade” hidden under his socks. He has repeatedly called the suicide hotline run by the Samaritans because he thought about killing himself “hundreds of times a day.”
No mention of BZ here is MASSIVE GLOW.
Hashmi was deeply religious, and some of his views, including his praise of the Afghan resistance, were controversial, but he had a right to express these sentiments. More importantly, he had a right to expect freedom from persecution and imprisonment because of his opinions, just as Assange should have the freedom, like any publisher, to inform the public about the inner workings of power.
True
Largely this is a good article that makes valid points of how Enemies of the State are treated. It didn’t even go into the reality of Diesel Therapy or the depths of the Chemical Torture being used to destroy Assange.
Make no mistake. If you truly expose the Pentagram you will be tortured and never ever know justice.
I 100% agree that Assange is being tortured and slowly, painfully, killed over in the UK. It’s a crime against humanity. The fact the author in OP’s article argues that he 100% would be treated the same way here strikes me as odd given my understanding of Q and my glimpse of the agreement Assange has in terms of his DMS files.
However, I don’t buy Hashmi being this “good guy” who got a bad deal. I didn’t even know about him until reading OP’s article today. Knowing what I know now about sealed grand jury indictments, intelligence communities/foreign adversaries recruiting and planting people on college campuses, and SA agents funding the 9/11 perpetrators—and living with them, at times—I refuse to blindly accept the “it was just socks!” angle this author is pushing.
As a descendant of a Declaration signer, all of today’s reality makes my blood boil. The treatment of Assange is atrocious. The concerted effort to enslave us all by removing transparency, justice, and liberty enrages me constantly. But this article seems to twist facts to fit a narrative that I’m not sure I support.
I hear you. The author is simply pushing the socks angle as it’s literally what charges the government is claiming.
If anything he was a participant per SA / ISS / MOSSAD / CIA / MI6 who all did 9/11 together and they are keeping him locked up this way to set a precedent.
If he was a threat - they would kill his ass. The entire point is to smear him and establish acceptance for locking someone away for “socks” yes? Then someone like Julian everyone willingly accepts - which is precisely what has happened.
Julian helps the world and the world turns their back and watches the latest Squid Games and forgets.
This is a better example. If JA gets sent to the US he’s going into SAMs
In the case of Abu Hamza, it was argued that his extradition would be oppressive because he would likely be held under SAMs, despite severe health issues, including that he is missing both hands.
US prosecutors guaranteed that this would not be the case stating that if he were, it would only be for a short time.
Once they had their hands on Hamza, they placed him under SAMs in ADX Florence, where he remains to this day.
Because of the contract he’s got, and the fact the UK is arguing against it while torturing him to death in their own prisons. Similar idea to how the democrats accuse Trump of doing everything they’re guilty of committing themselves.
Also because Colin Powell and Grant Woods are in his insurance files.
Both Powell and Woods are now dead. The WHs definitely took care of them.
Snowden is mentioned as a liability; JA is not. JA, strikingly, is not mentioned specifically as a patriot by Q, unlike Seth Rich.
And I’m pretty sure Cicada knows who is in his files. Which is why they want the source files—so the blackmail remains useful.
Assange knows this, so his DMS keeps him alive. Unfortunately, they’re still hell bent on torturing him because of what he has and what he’s managed to do.
Why did propagandist outlets Time Magazine, WAPO & NYT hype up Wikileaks back in 2006, several months before anybody had ever even heard of Wikileaks, and well before they had released any "damaging" documents. Can you imagine the dollar amount of free advertising/marketing that generated for Assange?
Honeypot? One can only imagine how many REAL whistleblower documents were captured by Wikileaks and summarily squashed, never to see the light of day.
I'm with you on this one. I for one thought DJT would pardon and bring him home. When listening to different people talk about why that would not happen, nothing made sense. I've been thinking the WH have him here already and safe.
I saw some threads on that theory on 4chan around the time of Jan 6th. Someone posted a convincing snapshot of Assange in NG gear in a thread about Nancy’s missing laptop.
There’s a lot that doesn’t add up about him. And I unfortunately don’t have the comp sci knowledge to really dig deep into any of it.
I still wonder if he couldn’t pardon him because the extradition is the way they get him the hell out of the UK.
I wanted Trump to get Assange to the US any way possible. And keep him alive. It is not The White Hats that want him silenced. Controlled maybe. It's complicated. It would be a crushing loss for him to lose his life over revealing truth. It happens to too many, for far less information than he possesses.
Has anyone lost sight of the fact that Assange violated U.S. law? He conspired with numerous individuals to glean intel from us, and then leveraged that info for his own PRIVATE gain. WikiLeaks wasn't shit without Manning, Snowden, Rich, etc. I know Snowden's thing is separate, but they both have corroborated each other's info, so the connection remains. Just because the Cabal cherry picks which laws to follow and which to ignore doesn't mean we should. The law needs to be followed, otherwise our whole society is useless beyond the obvious. If we cherry pick laws, then it makes it that much easier for [them] to circumvent and defeat what we're trying to do. Might as well not have nations, cities, counties, etc. Might as well destroy it all and make it every man for himself.
Assange was a Clown, ran afoul of the world's Intel agencies, and in the process screwed himself AND us because he wasn't just attempting to "shed light." He was ACTIVELY trying to thwart the efforts of White Hats. The fact that he thwarted Cabal efforts, imo, is moot. If he REALLY cares about Seth Rich, his family, and humanity in general, he'd divulge the info he has on [them]. The fact that he hasn't really given anything up tells me this is all ONE BIG, GIANT, DISTRACTION meant to do what it's doing here: DIVIDE. This whole argument, to me, is the quintessential WH v BH battle playing out. And people, including me, have called for him to stay in Britain. No. I now believe this is wrong. He JAS to be extradited. Not just because he's a traitor and deserves punishment, but because [they] control the UK way more effectively and way more absolute than the U.S.
And as far as we know, it could all be a LARP. No one's really seen him since he was "incarcerated." All we have are his wife's Wiki's, his lawyer's and the govt's word for it. If he's not feeling well enough to meet his accusers in the court room and we can't keep delaying the inevitable, then drag his ass in to court and get it over with. Let the World see what the truth is. This all plays too easily into the Cabal's hands. And people are just accepting it at face value? No bueno.
We can't arbitrarily decide which laws to follow and which to ignore based on feelings. This man betrayed every country he's previously aligned himself with. Why isn't anyone here acknowledging that? He betrayed BOTH sides of this war, in the process. He's the modern day Benedict Arnold. He deserves his fate on this. He's not even an American citizen. His "leaks" have hurt our cause almost as much as [theirs]. But it'll hurt our case more, in the long run, if he stays in Britain. I don't care if they give him BZ til he regresses to an infant. I don't care if his handler wife thinks he'll commit suicide. It's all bunk. It's for show. He's afraid if he does anything to help any one side too much, his power will erode because he'll be found out. NONE of the rest matters.
I often hear from misinformed people, that Julian Assange & Wikileaks somehow endangered the lives of our men and women in uniform with their release of war documents.
But Here is the truth:
In July 2010, when WikiLeaks began revealing secret documents about the war in Afghanistan, the Pentagon immediately accused him and his organization of having blood on their hands, because their publication would put Afghan translators and informants at risk, those who collaborated with American and Western coalition troops.
The Pentagon and the CIA created large task forces of intelligence analysts to sift through every single name that came out of those documents to try to find out if any of them had been killed or injured or imprisoned due to the release of those documents' names.
The Pentagon task force used as many as 100 intelligence experts for this.
11 years have passed, and not a single example of a person killed, injured or imprisoned has been discovered.
Wikileaks, has harmed 0 people. They revealed the Government lying to you directly about a war they had no intention of winning, and put a real face on the elite class of criminals that make up that ruling power; who were laundering your money through massive defense contracts into their own pockets.
That power is now seeking to steal your free speech by virtue of using their corrupt case against Assange.
Make no mistake, your rights are on trial.
If the US Government is able to game the British court system, despite their huge list of crimes committed along the way, we all stand to lose; and find ourselves imprisoned as well.
There has never been a better moment, to speak up, to speak out, and to fight against this injustice.
Not just for the sake of an innocent publisher, but for the sake of our very freedom and future.
Agreed about the Pentagon/Iraq situation, Vault 7, and especially the Pizzagate/Stratfor leaks.
I also agree to a certain extent, though, with what Sucka is saying. Not about the law part; Fahrenheit 451 is the largest example I have of needing to break laws in authoritarian states. And as you said, no one in uniform has been harmed by what was shared on WL.
However, Q’s drop about how information is shared with WL makes me curious what Assange’s intentions have been at times, especially if he is the rumored Triple Dipper.
Seth Rich stands out to me. Partially because I think people like Isaac Kappy and Seth Rich were actively trying to bring these evils to light, but because they didn’t know how to “play the game” like Assange, he got the info, and they got murdered. That does feel a little like extortion/rubs me the wrong way.
As I cannot see the chess board from where Assange is sitting, I can’t say for sure why he chose to withhold some information and share other pieces of the puzzle. My emotional reasoning asks why he couldn’t share everything to keep those people alive; my logical reasoning says there was more to the story and war begets casualties.
This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.
He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.
Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.” The claim he didn’t show up the second day because he’s “on a lot of medication” is concerning to say the least.
Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia? Crowdstrike? Servers. SR. JA. Why does the UK gov desperately want JA? Think source files. The more you know. Q”
I keep leaning toward the conclusion that they don’t want him extradited; he’d be theoretically safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him. I sometimes wonder if Assange arriving by plane on US soil would be what forces the military to take control, because they know he can’t fall into BH hands. If they have the source files, they can expose it all.
Full tin foil makes me think Assange’s wife is his handler, as she ~happened to know the languages necessary when his legal team was in crunch time for charges against him.~
Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.
I mean is it saying he was innocent me that he didn’t deserve the suspension of rights he got under the “Enemy Combatant” crap?
Assange is being forced BZ. He’s being psychologically tortured. BZ is a chemical agent that basically slowly lobotomizes you into insanity. They’re clearly trying to kill him in prison so they can call it suicide.
No mention of BZ here is MASSIVE GLOW.
True
Largely this is a good article that makes valid points of how Enemies of the State are treated. It didn’t even go into the reality of Diesel Therapy or the depths of the Chemical Torture being used to destroy Assange.
Make no mistake. If you truly expose the Pentagram you will be tortured and never ever know justice.
THIS IS DONE IN THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES
Our Forefathers would be HORRIFIED
I 100% agree that Assange is being tortured and slowly, painfully, killed over in the UK. It’s a crime against humanity. The fact the author in OP’s article argues that he 100% would be treated the same way here strikes me as odd given my understanding of Q and my glimpse of the agreement Assange has in terms of his DMS files.
However, I don’t buy Hashmi being this “good guy” who got a bad deal. I didn’t even know about him until reading OP’s article today. Knowing what I know now about sealed grand jury indictments, intelligence communities/foreign adversaries recruiting and planting people on college campuses, and SA agents funding the 9/11 perpetrators—and living with them, at times—I refuse to blindly accept the “it was just socks!” angle this author is pushing.
As a descendant of a Declaration signer, all of today’s reality makes my blood boil. The treatment of Assange is atrocious. The concerted effort to enslave us all by removing transparency, justice, and liberty enrages me constantly. But this article seems to twist facts to fit a narrative that I’m not sure I support.
I hear you. The author is simply pushing the socks angle as it’s literally what charges the government is claiming.
If anything he was a participant per SA / ISS / MOSSAD / CIA / MI6 who all did 9/11 together and they are keeping him locked up this way to set a precedent.
If he was a threat - they would kill his ass. The entire point is to smear him and establish acceptance for locking someone away for “socks” yes? Then someone like Julian everyone willingly accepts - which is precisely what has happened.
Julian helps the world and the world turns their back and watches the latest Squid Games and forgets.
This is a better example. If JA gets sent to the US he’s going into SAMs
In the case of Abu Hamza, it was argued that his extradition would be oppressive because he would likely be held under SAMs, despite severe health issues, including that he is missing both hands. US prosecutors guaranteed that this would not be the case stating that if he were, it would only be for a short time. Once they had their hands on Hamza, they placed him under SAMs in ADX Florence, where he remains to this day.
This article doesn’t glow. It’s a good summary of what’s going on and what’s at stake.
What makes you think he would be in WH hands if he gets sent to the US?
Because of the contract he’s got, and the fact the UK is arguing against it while torturing him to death in their own prisons. Similar idea to how the democrats accuse Trump of doing everything they’re guilty of committing themselves.
Also because Colin Powell and Grant Woods are in his insurance files.
Both Powell and Woods are now dead. The WHs definitely took care of them.
Snowden is mentioned as a liability; JA is not. JA, strikingly, is not mentioned specifically as a patriot by Q, unlike Seth Rich.
Much of my thinking revolving JA stems from this thread and those like that from around that time.
WH aren’t the ones in court right now. If he gets sent to the US he’s going to get thrown in SAMS/ADX and probably killed.
Unlike Isaac Kappy, his DMS is real
And I’m pretty sure Cicada knows who is in his files. Which is why they want the source files—so the blackmail remains useful.
Assange knows this, so his DMS keeps him alive. Unfortunately, they’re still hell bent on torturing him because of what he has and what he’s managed to do.
Excellent comment. Moar of this.
Thanks, cats!
The US has charged Assange with 17 counts??
Yes.
One of the biggest Q issues I had was “June ETA”
It never happened. What they are doing to Julian js disgusting
June of what year?
https://operationq.pub/?n=1195
2018 was the guess then.
Why did propagandist outlets Time Magazine, WAPO & NYT hype up Wikileaks back in 2006, several months before anybody had ever even heard of Wikileaks, and well before they had released any "damaging" documents. Can you imagine the dollar amount of free advertising/marketing that generated for Assange?
Honeypot? One can only imagine how many REAL whistleblower documents were captured by Wikileaks and summarily squashed, never to see the light of day.
I’m note sure they’ve been squashed.
I do, however, think they may have been kept out of the public eye in agreements to keep JA alive.
I'm with you on this one. I for one thought DJT would pardon and bring him home. When listening to different people talk about why that would not happen, nothing made sense. I've been thinking the WH have him here already and safe.
I saw some threads on that theory on 4chan around the time of Jan 6th. Someone posted a convincing snapshot of Assange in NG gear in a thread about Nancy’s missing laptop.
There’s a lot that doesn’t add up about him. And I unfortunately don’t have the comp sci knowledge to really dig deep into any of it.
I still wonder if he couldn’t pardon him because the extradition is the way they get him the hell out of the UK.
My thoughts exactly. Get him back here under the radar not out in the open.
What if JA works for "them"? Penance for hacking the Pentagon and MILNET perhaps?
He didn't become a celebrity by accident...
Excellent read!
The MODS in here are all about screwing over Assange because they love censorship
I wanted Trump to get Assange to the US any way possible. And keep him alive. It is not The White Hats that want him silenced. Controlled maybe. It's complicated. It would be a crushing loss for him to lose his life over revealing truth. It happens to too many, for far less information than he possesses.
Has anyone lost sight of the fact that Assange violated U.S. law? He conspired with numerous individuals to glean intel from us, and then leveraged that info for his own PRIVATE gain. WikiLeaks wasn't shit without Manning, Snowden, Rich, etc. I know Snowden's thing is separate, but they both have corroborated each other's info, so the connection remains. Just because the Cabal cherry picks which laws to follow and which to ignore doesn't mean we should. The law needs to be followed, otherwise our whole society is useless beyond the obvious. If we cherry pick laws, then it makes it that much easier for [them] to circumvent and defeat what we're trying to do. Might as well not have nations, cities, counties, etc. Might as well destroy it all and make it every man for himself.
Assange was a Clown, ran afoul of the world's Intel agencies, and in the process screwed himself AND us because he wasn't just attempting to "shed light." He was ACTIVELY trying to thwart the efforts of White Hats. The fact that he thwarted Cabal efforts, imo, is moot. If he REALLY cares about Seth Rich, his family, and humanity in general, he'd divulge the info he has on [them]. The fact that he hasn't really given anything up tells me this is all ONE BIG, GIANT, DISTRACTION meant to do what it's doing here: DIVIDE. This whole argument, to me, is the quintessential WH v BH battle playing out. And people, including me, have called for him to stay in Britain. No. I now believe this is wrong. He JAS to be extradited. Not just because he's a traitor and deserves punishment, but because [they] control the UK way more effectively and way more absolute than the U.S.
And as far as we know, it could all be a LARP. No one's really seen him since he was "incarcerated." All we have are his wife's Wiki's, his lawyer's and the govt's word for it. If he's not feeling well enough to meet his accusers in the court room and we can't keep delaying the inevitable, then drag his ass in to court and get it over with. Let the World see what the truth is. This all plays too easily into the Cabal's hands. And people are just accepting it at face value? No bueno.
We can't arbitrarily decide which laws to follow and which to ignore based on feelings. This man betrayed every country he's previously aligned himself with. Why isn't anyone here acknowledging that? He betrayed BOTH sides of this war, in the process. He's the modern day Benedict Arnold. He deserves his fate on this. He's not even an American citizen. His "leaks" have hurt our cause almost as much as [theirs]. But it'll hurt our case more, in the long run, if he stays in Britain. I don't care if they give him BZ til he regresses to an infant. I don't care if his handler wife thinks he'll commit suicide. It's all bunk. It's for show. He's afraid if he does anything to help any one side too much, his power will erode because he'll be found out. NONE of the rest matters.
I often hear from misinformed people, that Julian Assange & Wikileaks somehow endangered the lives of our men and women in uniform with their release of war documents.
But Here is the truth:
In July 2010, when WikiLeaks began revealing secret documents about the war in Afghanistan, the Pentagon immediately accused him and his organization of having blood on their hands, because their publication would put Afghan translators and informants at risk, those who collaborated with American and Western coalition troops.
The Pentagon and the CIA created large task forces of intelligence analysts to sift through every single name that came out of those documents to try to find out if any of them had been killed or injured or imprisoned due to the release of those documents' names.
The Pentagon task force used as many as 100 intelligence experts for this.
11 years have passed, and not a single example of a person killed, injured or imprisoned has been discovered.
Wikileaks, has harmed 0 people. They revealed the Government lying to you directly about a war they had no intention of winning, and put a real face on the elite class of criminals that make up that ruling power; who were laundering your money through massive defense contracts into their own pockets.
That power is now seeking to steal your free speech by virtue of using their corrupt case against Assange.
Make no mistake, your rights are on trial. If the US Government is able to game the British court system, despite their huge list of crimes committed along the way, we all stand to lose; and find ourselves imprisoned as well.
There has never been a better moment, to speak up, to speak out, and to fight against this injustice.
Not just for the sake of an innocent publisher, but for the sake of our very freedom and future.
At the end of this, you are their target.
Agreed about the Pentagon/Iraq situation, Vault 7, and especially the Pizzagate/Stratfor leaks.
I also agree to a certain extent, though, with what Sucka is saying. Not about the law part; Fahrenheit 451 is the largest example I have of needing to break laws in authoritarian states. And as you said, no one in uniform has been harmed by what was shared on WL.
However, Q’s drop about how information is shared with WL makes me curious what Assange’s intentions have been at times, especially if he is the rumored Triple Dipper.
Seth Rich stands out to me. Partially because I think people like Isaac Kappy and Seth Rich were actively trying to bring these evils to light, but because they didn’t know how to “play the game” like Assange, he got the info, and they got murdered. That does feel a little like extortion/rubs me the wrong way.
As I cannot see the chess board from where Assange is sitting, I can’t say for sure why he chose to withhold some information and share other pieces of the puzzle. My emotional reasoning asks why he couldn’t share everything to keep those people alive; my logical reasoning says there was more to the story and war begets casualties.