Do you think casting out doubters from the community that is entirely devoted to a cause that hasn’t been fully divulged and cannot yet be proven entirely is a good thing?
Doubters of the cause or doubters of the source?
More importantly… doesn’t the fact that everyone here is anonymous here worry you? All of the other communities are overrun with bots and deep state actors… but not this one?
Who thinks that? This place is crawling with bots, shills, and sock-puppets.
All of the stuff upvoted and all of the trends are entirely from patriots?
I like how you lumped in "thinkers" with "questioners, doubters, and skeptics", as if anyone who happens not to express doubt with respect to this or that topic is incapable of thinking.
I think I understand your point more fully after reading more of your comments, and I sympathize. However, to me, your phrasing suggested that that there aren't any "thinkers" (or maybe "thinker" types) on the board aside from "doomers". Apologies if I misunderstood.
But that's not what happens in most cases. It's not the questioning itself... it's "how" it's questioned. The doomers are the ones who think they have it all figured out already. They aren't questioning as much as they are making absolute statements and criticizing those who aren't as enlightened as they are
That is complete nonsense. Honest legitimate questions are welcome here and always have been. If you can’t see that you’re not trying. Someone whining like a little bitch is not acceptable. Complaining like a faggot because it’s taking too long for someone’s schedule is not acceptable. If The Great Awakening is too difficult for them while they’re sitting comfortably in they’re house then they should go to patriots.win… where you can circle jerk about 2024.
Straw man argument/premise . Simply put: Not ALL questioners are doomers; to doubt is not to doom and being a thinker does not equate being a doomer. Doomers do not question, they state opinions as facts; they do not posit doubt: they project worst case scenarios as being legitimate concerns; and to suggest that one cannot think without being categorized as a doomer is intellectual dishonesty and twisted logic. GTFO shill.
Lol Did I hit a nerve? Or I must be projecting. But wait. You are the one trying to conflate that we on GAW view people that ask questions as being doomers; you are the one saying that if someone expresses doubt, it is construed as being a doomer; and you are the one that suggest that if one thinks, one is a doomer. I am not projecting, but I do have the opinion you are shilling, and hard. If the hat fits...
this post is a great example of the battle for this forum. who is shill? who is not shill? pretty much everyone responding here is responding in a shill like manner. no one is actually making a genuine attempt to dispel any doubts op has expressed as to the direction this forum his headed. outsiders that stumble upon this post and read the comments must think we are some really fucked up people here. how about attacking his comments as opposed to attacking him personally? if you really cannot resist that, how about just downvote and move on. if your really think its egregious, report the fucker and move on.
I never get people who say we should have GAW.win as unrestricted free speech, do they even know what that means when it comes to a forum with a subject?
What that means is that I should be able to post anything I like on these boards and not have it moved or deleted if it's way off subject.
Are you asking for this OP?
Because if I read your words with a dictionary description, that's unrestricted.
But then who's protecting my rights to come and chat about Q and related subjects without people derailing the subjects?
At its lowest common denominator, we are all doubters/questioners/etc. That is why we found this place. We doubt/question/distrust anything being spouted by normal channels, and are seeking the truth without their filters/spin.
A doomer is a person who has lost faith that NCSWIC. A doomer is someone who has forgotten what Q has told us. We all get frustrated and discouraged sometimes, but Q has even addressed this.
There is a difference between questioning and coming into this space spewing doubt and doom all over the place, as if one's current discouragement/panic is solid proof that we're all being played. It's not. It's a temporary state that needs to be seen for what it is. Remember: we are WATCHING the movie. We aren't directing it, or starring in it (yet), we didn't write the script, and we have little influence over events right now. There will be an important role for us, but that time is not yet.
Q has said "disinfo is everywhere and necessary". If disinfo is everywhere, and it is, then Q is telling the truth. "How many times before it's mathematically impossible" that we're just seeing a series of coincidences? There are no coincidences, so one's mindset needs to get right about what we're seeing. We must mentally and emotionally hold fast to what has already been proven to us.
If you have lost your faith, but not hope, then just be still and quiet. Wind and waves are everywhere. Watch, read, observe until your faith is restored.
I don’t see that in the forum rules.
Maybe start a new .win called “Skeptical about Q”.
It’s possible to have questions about a certain topic without making the huge leap to ‘Skeptical about Q’.
It is totally possible. It’s easy to spot the difference.
Doubters of the cause or doubters of the source?
Who thinks that? This place is crawling with bots, shills, and sock-puppets.
Hell no. See above.
I like how you lumped in "thinkers" with "questioners, doubters, and skeptics", as if anyone who happens not to express doubt with respect to this or that topic is incapable of thinking.
I think I understand your point more fully after reading more of your comments, and I sympathize. However, to me, your phrasing suggested that that there aren't any "thinkers" (or maybe "thinker" types) on the board aside from "doomers". Apologies if I misunderstood.
Insults are not a great way to boost your case, OP. Just makes you look like a shill, because we don't communicate like that with each other here....
Agreed 100%. It’s absolutely unacceptable how anyone who questions ANYTHING is immediately viciously attacked and labeled a doomer.
But that's not what happens in most cases. It's not the questioning itself... it's "how" it's questioned. The doomers are the ones who think they have it all figured out already. They aren't questioning as much as they are making absolute statements and criticizing those who aren't as enlightened as they are
...you mean, like what everyone does to the people asking questions?
And yet some doomer downvoted me lol
And that offends you why?
It was sarcastic. The doomer (as I defined them) consider themselves to be the enlightened ones. Hence the criticism of those who disagree with them
Odd that you seem to agree with me but then are so triggered by a word that you are inspired to downvote
That is complete nonsense. Honest legitimate questions are welcome here and always have been. If you can’t see that you’re not trying. Someone whining like a little bitch is not acceptable. Complaining like a faggot because it’s taking too long for someone’s schedule is not acceptable. If The Great Awakening is too difficult for them while they’re sitting comfortably in they’re house then they should go to patriots.win… where you can circle jerk about 2024.
Straw man argument/premise . Simply put: Not ALL questioners are doomers; to doubt is not to doom and being a thinker does not equate being a doomer. Doomers do not question, they state opinions as facts; they do not posit doubt: they project worst case scenarios as being legitimate concerns; and to suggest that one cannot think without being categorized as a doomer is intellectual dishonesty and twisted logic. GTFO shill.
Lol Did I hit a nerve? Or I must be projecting. But wait. You are the one trying to conflate that we on GAW view people that ask questions as being doomers; you are the one saying that if someone expresses doubt, it is construed as being a doomer; and you are the one that suggest that if one thinks, one is a doomer. I am not projecting, but I do have the opinion you are shilling, and hard. If the hat fits...
Free speech is being able to go to Patriots.win and share your doubts. Dot Win is a community.
this post is a great example of the battle for this forum. who is shill? who is not shill? pretty much everyone responding here is responding in a shill like manner. no one is actually making a genuine attempt to dispel any doubts op has expressed as to the direction this forum his headed. outsiders that stumble upon this post and read the comments must think we are some really fucked up people here. how about attacking his comments as opposed to attacking him personally? if you really cannot resist that, how about just downvote and move on. if your really think its egregious, report the fucker and move on.
You can be a doomer whilst asking questions
I can
I love that you downvote like a true doomer
Pathetic
Of course not but if we languish in that which we cannot control what have we left?
Dooming is an attitude, a posture.
Which is pretty much all you do
I never get people who say we should have GAW.win as unrestricted free speech, do they even know what that means when it comes to a forum with a subject?
What that means is that I should be able to post anything I like on these boards and not have it moved or deleted if it's way off subject.
Are you asking for this OP? Because if I read your words with a dictionary description, that's unrestricted.
But then who's protecting my rights to come and chat about Q and related subjects without people derailing the subjects?
At its lowest common denominator, we are all doubters/questioners/etc. That is why we found this place. We doubt/question/distrust anything being spouted by normal channels, and are seeking the truth without their filters/spin.
A doomer is a person who has lost faith that NCSWIC. A doomer is someone who has forgotten what Q has told us. We all get frustrated and discouraged sometimes, but Q has even addressed this.
There is a difference between questioning and coming into this space spewing doubt and doom all over the place, as if one's current discouragement/panic is solid proof that we're all being played. It's not. It's a temporary state that needs to be seen for what it is. Remember: we are WATCHING the movie. We aren't directing it, or starring in it (yet), we didn't write the script, and we have little influence over events right now. There will be an important role for us, but that time is not yet.
Q has said "disinfo is everywhere and necessary". If disinfo is everywhere, and it is, then Q is telling the truth. "How many times before it's mathematically impossible" that we're just seeing a series of coincidences? There are no coincidences, so one's mindset needs to get right about what we're seeing. We must mentally and emotionally hold fast to what has already been proven to us.
If you have lost your faith, but not hope, then just be still and quiet. Wind and waves are everywhere. Watch, read, observe until your faith is restored.