A Take on the Bannon Indictment from Brian Cates
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Somebody else, I think it was Patel Patriot in his most recent Devolution article, also suggested that the Jan 6 commission is really about accessing Trump's PEADs. It said Congress previously tried 3 other times to access them.
Presidential Emergency Action Documents. Classified draft executive orders kept on standby to be signed in a major emergency. It is likely that Trump activated devolution through PEADs.
What is curious is that, even though their man is supposedly President, the Ds in Congress are still terrified of these documents, and more curiously, do not seem to have a means of accessing them.
It's nice to see Bannon doing something for once.
Lol
Indicted for failing to give testimony and papers related to Jan 6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1447811/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery. Weird though, because he was not in the White House, and would have known as much as any journalist, which is his role. Not sure if that is gonna fly. Pretty sure there is a thing called the first amendment.
I would bet a hefty sum that Bannon does have some level of knowledge about those things, but I don't think he would talk regardless
In fact, I don't think any of those people would talk. Probably why Bannon and Meadows are uninterested in showing up to Congress
This is my take too. Bannon and certain others, Roger stone fits well here too I think, they were loud mouth pieces who were willing to take some heat.
For the record, I believe he intended to type Chris Miller rather than Stephen Miller.
No, Stephen Miller is correct, he was there from beginning.
Was he in a position to be involved in devolution though? I don't remember his exact job
Sorry I don't remember his position, Chris Miller came in to the picture a little later, also I trust Crates reporting. I could be wrong, trying to remember all this shit is mind numbing!
Devolution is compartmentalized so many can be involved with few knowing the whole picture.
Stephen Miller is correct.
Stephen Miller started GETTR, didn't he?
No that was Jason Miller
Jeez, how many miller's are there? LOL
Mark Meadows just missed his debut subpoena with the J6 Congressional hearing? What does this mean?
Patel Patriots Dev13 states Mark Meadows is the back channel to PDJT so I figure he knows resistance to congress's demands is what is needed to hasten the end game...
What is Brians position on Q?
I don't think he's ever been publicly on board with Q, but has also never attacked Q followers. A lot of his research and theories follow the same lines as Q.
True, and he writes for x22 if I recall. Brian's a good egg imo.
Publicly supporting Q doesn't help Brian do his job, and would probably be a liability, even if he's a full Qtard when he's off the clock. I think he doesn't talk about Q in order to keep himself safe on the platforms.
He also is a regular on X22, and reposts alot of Q folks on his Telegram
He has publicly denounced Lin Wood though. However, Lin doesn't seem like he's been doing very much to actually fight for our cause lately so I'm unsure of what to think about that.
He describes himself as "Q neutral". More open to it than others from the SQV crowd, but not an outright anon.
His position is that since Q is not "open source" he is not interested in looking into it. I don't really buy that he hasn't, just think he has a target audience. conservativetreehouse is vehemently anti-Q supposedly.
I have always wondered if these guys are really just part of the great awakening plan. Their reasons for not being interested and in CTH's case being so vocally anti-Q don't really ring true to me. I think the military psyops people know that certain people will shut out information if it is associated with something like Q, so they need reporters that are providing the same information in a non-Q form.
I call BS, I am in the US Navy and it is GONE, run by nut jobs there are no patriots in control there and if there are they are asleep.
Sounds about right to me.
Also it looks good to distract from the Durham indictments when they say oh we indicted Steve Bannon. they want to start building the narrative that the Durham indictments are political charged so they are going to the start targeting anyone they can on the right side of the isle.
Supposedly only10 know-7 are military, that leaves 3 civilians.
Until one is honest with themselves about their current situation, they can NEVER improve it.