POST 916 is coming true before our very eyes:
"We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time. Q"
(www.bitchute.com)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (128)
sorted by:
Israel itself is a product of the deep state
recommended reading: "Who is Edom-Esau": https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSW5FE1R0KpwnVTByf2csbnuPst19oMD/view
Esau was the first born of Isaac, and thus was heir to the birthright derived from the direct racial lineage of Adam to Noah to Abraham. Just as "Esau despised his birthright" (Gen. 25:34) when he sold it to Jacob, he also despised his race by marrying strange women outside of his race. Esau married the daughters of Canaan or Canaanites (Gen. 28:6; 36:2), the daughters of Heth or Hittites (Gen. 26:34; 27:46; 36:2), the daughters of Ishmael (Gen. 28:9; 36:3), the daughters of the Hivites (Gen. 36:2), and had intermarried with the Horites (Gen. 36:19-21). These interracial marriages "were a grief of mind to Isaac and Rebekah," Esau's parents (Gen. 26:35). The descendants of Esau from these marriages became known as "Edomites" or as "Edom" (Gen. 36:1, 9).
"The Edomites were driven from Petra westward by the Nabatheans in 312 B.C., and before the middle of the second century B.C. they were occupying, not only southern Judah, but also Hebron and the country to its north as far as Bethzur (1 Mac. 4:29; 5:65)
Julius Caesar made Antipater, an Edomite, Procurator of Judea in 47 B.C. When Antipater was killed four years later his son Herod gained power but was rejected by the Judahites. Herod shrewdly gained the support of Rome. With a Roman army at his heels be returned to Palestine, and after a six-month siege he captured Jerusalem, and became king of Judea in 37 B.C.
TL;DR Jews are descendants of Esau, the Edom, not to be confused with the Judahites who are Israelites. John Hyrcanus forcibly converted the Edomites to Talmudism/Judaism. They are the "children of the serpent" and "synagogue of Satan" Jesus spoke of.
And before someone asserts Jesus was an edomite: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
I knew parts of this story from scripture! Wow you filled in a lot! I’d love to talk to you!
I believe Herod was the shadow and type of Pope!
Ever wondered who the people who "Were of seed of Abraham but had never known bondage" were? (John 8:7) Edomites of course.
Edom mixed with fallen angels, Mount Seor being the place where people bred with fallen angels, and Edom marrying these Horites. But in Genesis 36:12, which is part of that genealogy of Esau, it talks about Esau’s grandson, who has wives and has children, and then it also says he has this son Amalek, and it says that he has this son Amalek with a concubine, a sexual slave, named Timna, who’s a Horite. The Horites are identified as nephilim in Deuteronomy. So this is someone from a giant clan who is a concubine, who is in a kind of ritual sexual slavery, and who is described as being literally the sister of Leviathan.
Popes came from the Roman Emporers.
this is a flat out lie. The son of Abraham was Isaac. The son of Isaac was Jacob, the son of Jacob was Judah the father of the Jews. King David was of the tribe of Judah. Jesus Christ comes from the line of David. There are 12 princes that come from Ishmael, the muslim nations make up most of these peoples today.
Technically, Judah was the father of the Judahites. His father was Jacob, the "father of Israel" the 12 tribes, of which Judah was one. Jesus still comes from the line of David, through Judah, through Jacob, through Isaac, through Abraham.
There seems to be a compelling case that the so called "Jews" were actually through the line of Esau and the term was bastardized to apply to all remaining Israelites who merged with those of Judea following the collopse of Israel.
Yes, Islam draws its line through Ishmael, another "first son" but illegitimate in terms of birthright.
How is it a flat out lie?
Genesis 25:19-34
19 And these are the generations of Isaac, Abraham's son: Abraham begat Isaac:
20 And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21 And Isaac intreated the Lord for his wife, because she was barren: and the Lord was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22 And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the Lord.
23 And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
24 And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.
26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.
27 And the boys grew: and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents.
28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison: but Rebekah loved Jacob.
29 And Jacob sod pottage: and Esau came from the field, and he was faint:
30 And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.
31 And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright.
32 And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?
33 And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob.
34 Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright.
And if you read the Book of Enoch, you'll see why Esau was at the point of death, and why he so willingly sold his inheritance for a pot of lentil stew and some bread.
Thank you!
The reference you cite at the end is false information -- of course Jesus was "a jew" -- he said so himself.
E.g., John 4: 21-23 “Believe me, woman, the time is coming when you Samaritans will worship the Father neither here at this mountain nor there in Jerusalem. You worship guessing in the dark; we Jews worship in the clear light of day. God’s way of salvation is made available through the Jews.
Very good summary. Thanks for the good work.
start at Hitler being a Rothschild sock puppet
Balfour Declaration of 1917
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
I just watched Europa The Last Battle Part 2 yesterday and it addresses that very question.
edit: at least it touches on the creation of Israel (not so much on its ties to the derp state)
I would suggest New World Order: Communism By The Backdoor and The Secret Masonicn Victory of WW2 if you want to get into stuff specifically on the cabal and deepstate. Europa the Last Battle more focuses on what really happened during WW2, the lies made about it, although it has stuff slipped in here and there about communism and the deepstate.
Don’t know much about the connections to deep state upon its founding but It would seem the establishment (mainly British) was quite resistant to this movement when it began. Anyway, a little bit ago I read a book called “the man eaters of tsavo.” Which the movie ghost in the darkness is somewhat based upon. Col patterson was a Christian Irishman Who sympathized with some of his peers who were Jewish refugees. He ended up playing a key role in the training of the Zion mule brigade, which was made up of Jewish refugees who wanted to take back their homeland from the Ottoman Empire. Much like the Irish who came to fight in our civil war in order to gain military experience and return to Ireland and regain their country from the British, the Zion mule brigade fought with the British to gain experience to fight off the Turkish empire. The men involved seemed genuine and don’t seem too deep state to me but you never know.
https://zionism-israel.com/dic/Zion_mule_corps.htm
Patterson... I remember that name. William Goldman, famous screenwriter (Misery, Princess Bride, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid among others) wrote a movie called the Ghost and the Darkness, about two man eating lions that interrupted the construction of the British railroad across Africa, and Patterson was instrumental in shooting these two lions.
The legend was good but the movie is mediocre at best due to shenanigans between the actors and the movie studios. (Kevin Costner accepted the row, but the studio wanted to ask Tom Cruise. Tom Cruise said no, Costner found this insulting and quit, Michael Douglas got involved and he was okay as a producer but decided to act as well and wrecked things.... big mess.).
Interesting. The man eaters of tsavo is actually Patterson’s first hand account of that story. Pretty good read. The lions were stuffed and given to the field museum of natural history in Chicago Illinois. In his accounts he talks about how it was a very common occurrence for people to just disappear and never be seen again. It wasn’t just the lions that would snatch you up. I’ve found that real life portrayed through historical accounts and biographies/autobiographies are always more fascinating than movies. Another one of my favorites is “Crow killer”. If you’ve ever seen Jeremiah Johnson, that’s the Disney version of one of the baddest dudes to walk this earth.They butchered his story. Crow killer is the biography of “liver eating“ Johnson. A great book too if you enjoy historical accounts.
I read a book of screenplays by Bill Goldman that included the films you mentioned. I think Butch Cassidy was his best work and is my personal favorite. And as you mention, Ghost in the Darkness was a mediocre film. I remember being underwhelmed with it back in the 90's.
I want to thank you for posting that clip from Crimes and Misdemeanors. I had never seen it, so I watched the entire movie last night and was blown away. I've seen a handful of Allen films, but I never knew he explored religion and moral structure so thoughtfully. Then he really brings it home with the question of morals vs happiness, or selfishness (or worldliness) vs unhappiness. It believe it offers insight into his own life decisions as they pertain to his selfishness and happiness.
Thanks again for posting. It's not often that a film recommendation lands so high on my list of favorites.
Came here to say the same! u/VaccinesCauseSIDS
Rothschild created.
Well posted 👑Sircats!