Yeah, this video came out a few days ago and really lifted me up. I was feeling down in the dumps. There are two new videos - one from Wagga Wagga and one an itnerview - they haven't uploaded yet, but its on telegram. I am gonna watch it once I figure out how to stream them to my TV. Gawd, I hate telegram videos.
It’s great we have a choice now. Voted Liberal all my voting life. Never again. I listened to a video of Devolution last night. One thing the guy said was that 45 was fixing from the top down and had equipped Patriots to fix from the ground up. Grassroots. I think this is happening worldwide. Next time you see Morrison, have a close look. It doesn’t look like him. Unless he’s lost weight.
Devolution is providing a robust support framework and security for destroying the evil ground up. As we get closer, people will be amazed when the Storm arrives, because the Storm is the people waking up, being empowered, and taking back control. It will be glorious and worth all the wait!
So now the storm is the people ? Not the 300k sealed items ?? One of the most frustrating parts of this whole thing is the moving goal posts. We are almost as bad as them, except we aren’t retards. So we have that going for us, which is nice.
There's enough evidence at least to start a seed in your mind.
Nothing is black and white. What you can do is ascribe probabilities to scenarios. Is the scenario likely, what should/can I do if xyz. am I guarded / prepared in most likely scenarios etc.
The picture comparisons of old Biden new Biden definitely put a seed in my mind. Am I sure, no. Is it a probability? With all the circumstantial evidence? Yes, and in Biden's case it's even a very likely scenario.
Either way, like you say. Two wings of the same bird.
Just never constrain yourself to not entertain ideas.
Morrison is definitely a pedo, I have heard that from at least two different people talking about the past. So either he has co-operated with the White Hats, or, yeah .... he has been replaced.
Look, I know its pretty ridiculous to think people have been replaced by actors. However, you have to concede that Biden is definitely not the same guy and Trump even hinted that he has been "shot in the head". So if its possible in one case, is possible in more cases.
And funnily with Boris, if you have ever listened to his ex-mistress Jennifer Arcuri, she says that he was a very different guy when she met him, but at one point last year or so he went out to meet some "important people" and when he came back he was "not the same guy" in her words. Not sure what to make of it, just another point of data to consider.
At this point, given the amount of illusion our world is, I am ready to believe anything
I wondered that about Morrison too. I believe there are world leaders, like him and Modi and the Japanese PM that just might be working together with 45. America is protecting our shores - that is evident with the amount of US Military in exercise ready mode right across Australia. I’ve also heard that when the dirt settles, Australia and the US will become a partner in many ways, with no passports etc. It was explained that Australia would come under the protection of America. Australia will no longer be part of the Commonwealth. When I think what the Brits did to us at Gallipoli then WW2 where Churchill said ‘let the Japs take Australia then we will get her back after the war’. The sooner the better.
Someone posted video here with some dude in a car saying that Morrison used to be a child trafficker and he has deep connections with the pedo elite of Australia.
Not sure about that but there is a something in my spirit that doesn’t sit right with him. If he and Turnbull could of just butted out, maybe Australia would have had a chance under Abbott but he wasn’t strong enough between the media and the backstabbers, one being Morrison himself. .
Your view must be very limited. Take a look at "Biden". A quick glance should be sufficient. Here, let me help. See any similarity - apart from the fact that both men have heads?
Thanks. I don't see it that way. Limited? Au Contraire. I think my view is much, much broader than those who subscribe so vehemently, and confidently (like newly converted religious believers) to the double theory.
Jeepers. The entire Q project has/had a core focus on applying critical thinking, due diligence, using logic, reasoning, and a very evidence-based approach to processing information.
The evidence is VERY limited, imo. Just for starters, there are 100 amateurs who proclaim, with every confidence "just look at these pictures! See! Seeee!!!!???"
That's a deeply non-evidence-based conclusion. In my view, it has ALL the hallmarks of belief, not really rational evidence based reasoning and logic.
For example, are there other plausible explanations for the apparent differences that some people see? Certainly. When there are other possible explanations, its more a matter of 'belief' to choose one over the other without considering other forms of evidence.
Aging can and does affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
Plastic surgery and other medical interventions can certainly affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
As I stated in a recent comment, to give the double theory any really credibility to start with, I would really prefer (or need) to see a deep, thorough analysis by anatomical experts, people who have studied the human physiognomy and anatomy as specialists for a very significant time. Such an analysis would carry some weight. Why? Because it would be based on much, much more than just the "look! See! It's obvious".
I'm a trained linguist and have a good degree of training in textual analysis. I can take a body of text, and analyse it on maybe 10 different levels at least - analysis that can backup or debunk various conclusions that 'layperson's come to when dealing with text (i.e. reading an article in a paper, or a document, or comments, etc). Even though pretty much ALL English literate humans can read a text, what one accesses by deep and professionally developed analysis is on a whole different level.
Likewise, have you ever listened that person doing body language analysis breakdowns of different speakers - someone who was (or maybe still is) posting on ytube? That person has been trained in forensic levels of body language analysis.
So, to me, for the double theory to have any credibility to start with, I think I'd need some actual data-based information as opposed to just amateurs drawing conclusions based on their own limited impressions and views.
I mean, the theory could be right; I'm not saying it's not possible. All I'm saying is, it doesn't work within my approach to life in general but especially Q-related stuff, to buy into something without a certain threshold of evidence. It just seems to me irresponsible to adopt a belief without that level of due diligence. At least, I'm not willing to choose a belief - I take such choices quite seriously.
Other elements of evidence that I so far do not see:
Reasoning. WHY do body doubles? What would be the logical, reason-based NEED or Benefit of doing all that? How would it serve?
What other elements would such an action be predicated on? What other elements would need to be in place for it to even work? What is the entire framework required? (many potential massive factors would need to be accounted for)
How would that be managed? Who would know, who would not know? How would that be controlled? Could that be practically controlled in any reasonable way? If so, how? Militarily, forensically, etc?
etc.
This, in my view, is what due diligence looks like. And, for an operation of this scale, it would require massive control of massive numbers of factors. etc.
Q3906
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
You can substitute "belief" here for revelation, imo.
I'm wondering if you seriously still think such an approach (view) is limited.
Or should we just phone Austin Steinbart and ask him if it's true? /sarc.
Rotflmao.! “Voted liberal my whole life now never again“
It’s too late...! You needed to WTFU and use your God given common sense years ago and see these people for what they always have been. If politicians worshipping of baby killing in the womb whilst claiming catholic/Christian faith didn’t tip you off then not sure anything ever would have.
Let me explain something sweetie; your vote no longer matters - that’s why they have taken the gloves off. They have rigged the voting indefinitely and 2020 presidential showed you that with flying colors.
Tyrants and authoritarian pieces of shit show you their true colors when they no longer need your vote. YOU ARE HERE.!
Matilda is Australian, and she was referring to the "Liberal Party" - the party in Australia that has traditionally represented the right side of politics. Like the American Republicans. Aka 'conservative, asserting more individual rights, small government, etc'
Founded in the 1950's, the Australian Liberal Party took the name because at this time it represented a meaning in the original sense of 'liberal', that is, libertarian, non-govt focused, but individual and people focused.
Over the last 2 years, many Australians have come to the realization that both the Left and the Right are corrupt as nothing. Her whole life, Matilda voted the conservative party, but no more. It's just like Americans waking up to the whole RINO situation.
Gitmo probably doesn't realize the significance of that info. A lot of yanks have no real knowledge of the Australian system, and few would even realize that the "Liberal Party" was originally founded along the lines of liberal in the original sense: more like "libertarian"
Also, notice the references to the US political system. Gitmo has no idea you're even Australian.
Happens quite a bit around here, and one normally benefits by making such small explanations in lots of contexts. Predominantly Americans on this board.
Yeah, this video came out a few days ago and really lifted me up. I was feeling down in the dumps. There are two new videos - one from Wagga Wagga and one an itnerview - they haven't uploaded yet, but its on telegram. I am gonna watch it once I figure out how to stream them to my TV. Gawd, I hate telegram videos.
It’s great we have a choice now. Voted Liberal all my voting life. Never again. I listened to a video of Devolution last night. One thing the guy said was that 45 was fixing from the top down and had equipped Patriots to fix from the ground up. Grassroots. I think this is happening worldwide. Next time you see Morrison, have a close look. It doesn’t look like him. Unless he’s lost weight.
Devolution is providing a robust support framework and security for destroying the evil ground up. As we get closer, people will be amazed when the Storm arrives, because the Storm is the people waking up, being empowered, and taking back control. It will be glorious and worth all the wait!
So now the storm is the people ? Not the 300k sealed items ?? One of the most frustrating parts of this whole thing is the moving goal posts. We are almost as bad as them, except we aren’t retards. So we have that going for us, which is nice.
War is like that.
From an Anon to Q.
7557024 Thanks for standing watch with us for a little while on this emotional night. We are
with you and POTUS. Please pass that on to him.
Reply from Q
Friend/Patriot - hold your head up high.
POTUS was not harmed in any way today other than on paper (history books).
Sometimes you must sacrifice yourself for the greater good.
"I will gladly take all those SLINGS and arrows for you." - POTUS
But, even that, can be undone.
The enormity of what is coming will SHOCK THE WORLD.
Pray.
Q
Hmmmm. I don't entertain the theories that people have been replaced with doubles. Not enough clear evidence for it, in my view.
Either way, Morrison is hard to figure out. Is he a White Hat sleeper? So much of the stuff he does is nuts, and globalist, but other stuff isn't.
Either way, a LOT of people are waking up to the fact that Labor = Liberals, and they are both controlled by people who do NOT serve our interests...
There's enough evidence at least to start a seed in your mind.
Nothing is black and white. What you can do is ascribe probabilities to scenarios. Is the scenario likely, what should/can I do if xyz. am I guarded / prepared in most likely scenarios etc.
The picture comparisons of old Biden new Biden definitely put a seed in my mind. Am I sure, no. Is it a probability? With all the circumstantial evidence? Yes, and in Biden's case it's even a very likely scenario.
Either way, like you say. Two wings of the same bird.
Just never constrain yourself to not entertain ideas.
Well said. A good host should always be ready to entertain until the guest has shown himself to be disreputable, or unreliable.
I misspoke; I should have said 'subscribe', as in "I don't subscribe to the theories....".
Morrison is definitely a pedo, I have heard that from at least two different people talking about the past. So either he has co-operated with the White Hats, or, yeah .... he has been replaced.
Look, I know its pretty ridiculous to think people have been replaced by actors. However, you have to concede that Biden is definitely not the same guy and Trump even hinted that he has been "shot in the head". So if its possible in one case, is possible in more cases.
And funnily with Boris, if you have ever listened to his ex-mistress Jennifer Arcuri, she says that he was a very different guy when she met him, but at one point last year or so he went out to meet some "important people" and when he came back he was "not the same guy" in her words. Not sure what to make of it, just another point of data to consider.
At this point, given the amount of illusion our world is, I am ready to believe anything
Well, yeah, there's that.
I wondered that about Morrison too. I believe there are world leaders, like him and Modi and the Japanese PM that just might be working together with 45. America is protecting our shores - that is evident with the amount of US Military in exercise ready mode right across Australia. I’ve also heard that when the dirt settles, Australia and the US will become a partner in many ways, with no passports etc. It was explained that Australia would come under the protection of America. Australia will no longer be part of the Commonwealth. When I think what the Brits did to us at Gallipoli then WW2 where Churchill said ‘let the Japs take Australia then we will get her back after the war’. The sooner the better.
Someone posted video here with some dude in a car saying that Morrison used to be a child trafficker and he has deep connections with the pedo elite of Australia.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140cWp6DZ9/australian-prime-minister-scott-/
I've watched the whole thing , but don't know enough about all these people to actually believe it. But it could be a truth as well.
Edit: This also brings up the possibility that proof of his misdeeds is being used against him by whitehats.
Not sure about that but there is a something in my spirit that doesn’t sit right with him. If he and Turnbull could of just butted out, maybe Australia would have had a chance under Abbott but he wasn’t strong enough between the media and the backstabbers, one being Morrison himself. .
Your view must be very limited. Take a look at "Biden". A quick glance should be sufficient. Here, let me help. See any similarity - apart from the fact that both men have heads?
https://files.catbox.moe/bamw9k.jpg
Thanks. I don't see it that way. Limited? Au Contraire. I think my view is much, much broader than those who subscribe so vehemently, and confidently (like newly converted religious believers) to the double theory.
Jeepers. The entire Q project has/had a core focus on applying critical thinking, due diligence, using logic, reasoning, and a very evidence-based approach to processing information.
The evidence is VERY limited, imo. Just for starters, there are 100 amateurs who proclaim, with every confidence "just look at these pictures! See! Seeee!!!!???"
That's a deeply non-evidence-based conclusion. In my view, it has ALL the hallmarks of belief, not really rational evidence based reasoning and logic.
For example, are there other plausible explanations for the apparent differences that some people see? Certainly. When there are other possible explanations, its more a matter of 'belief' to choose one over the other without considering other forms of evidence.
Aging can and does affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
Plastic surgery and other medical interventions can certainly affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
As I stated in a recent comment, to give the double theory any really credibility to start with, I would really prefer (or need) to see a deep, thorough analysis by anatomical experts, people who have studied the human physiognomy and anatomy as specialists for a very significant time. Such an analysis would carry some weight. Why? Because it would be based on much, much more than just the "look! See! It's obvious".
I'm a trained linguist and have a good degree of training in textual analysis. I can take a body of text, and analyse it on maybe 10 different levels at least - analysis that can backup or debunk various conclusions that 'layperson's come to when dealing with text (i.e. reading an article in a paper, or a document, or comments, etc). Even though pretty much ALL English literate humans can read a text, what one accesses by deep and professionally developed analysis is on a whole different level.
Likewise, have you ever listened that person doing body language analysis breakdowns of different speakers - someone who was (or maybe still is) posting on ytube? That person has been trained in forensic levels of body language analysis.
So, to me, for the double theory to have any credibility to start with, I think I'd need some actual data-based information as opposed to just amateurs drawing conclusions based on their own limited impressions and views.
I mean, the theory could be right; I'm not saying it's not possible. All I'm saying is, it doesn't work within my approach to life in general but especially Q-related stuff, to buy into something without a certain threshold of evidence. It just seems to me irresponsible to adopt a belief without that level of due diligence. At least, I'm not willing to choose a belief - I take such choices quite seriously.
Other elements of evidence that I so far do not see:
Reasoning. WHY do body doubles? What would be the logical, reason-based NEED or Benefit of doing all that? How would it serve?
What other elements would such an action be predicated on? What other elements would need to be in place for it to even work? What is the entire framework required? (many potential massive factors would need to be accounted for)
How would that be managed? Who would know, who would not know? How would that be controlled? Could that be practically controlled in any reasonable way? If so, how? Militarily, forensically, etc?
etc.
This, in my view, is what due diligence looks like. And, for an operation of this scale, it would require massive control of massive numbers of factors. etc.
Q3906
You can substitute "belief" here for revelation, imo.
I'm wondering if you seriously still think such an approach (view) is limited.
Or should we just phone Austin Steinbart and ask him if it's true? /sarc.
Thanks for reading.
surely Dr. Jill would know.
Rotflmao.! “Voted liberal my whole life now never again“
It’s too late...! You needed to WTFU and use your God given common sense years ago and see these people for what they always have been. If politicians worshipping of baby killing in the womb whilst claiming catholic/Christian faith didn’t tip you off then not sure anything ever would have.
Let me explain something sweetie; your vote no longer matters - that’s why they have taken the gloves off. They have rigged the voting indefinitely and 2020 presidential showed you that with flying colors.
Tyrants and authoritarian pieces of shit show you their true colors when they no longer need your vote. YOU ARE HERE.!
You misinterpreted Matilda's comment, Gitmo.
Matilda is Australian, and she was referring to the "Liberal Party" - the party in Australia that has traditionally represented the right side of politics. Like the American Republicans. Aka 'conservative, asserting more individual rights, small government, etc'
Founded in the 1950's, the Australian Liberal Party took the name because at this time it represented a meaning in the original sense of 'liberal', that is, libertarian, non-govt focused, but individual and people focused.
Over the last 2 years, many Australians have come to the realization that both the Left and the Right are corrupt as nothing. Her whole life, Matilda voted the conservative party, but no more. It's just like Americans waking up to the whole RINO situation.
Yer welcome....
Thanks for clarifying!
Thanks ☺️
If you read my post you would realise that liberal doesn’t have a small ‘l’.
Gitmo probably doesn't realize the significance of that info. A lot of yanks have no real knowledge of the Australian system, and few would even realize that the "Liberal Party" was originally founded along the lines of liberal in the original sense: more like "libertarian"
Also, notice the references to the US political system. Gitmo has no idea you're even Australian.
Happens quite a bit around here, and one normally benefits by making such small explanations in lots of contexts. Predominantly Americans on this board.
Archive the links before posting, pretty please with cherry on top, for us telegram-free pedes.