GA.win Steady at 2.5 million visits per month - that's 80,000 visits per day
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Ditched Patriots.win and came here you folk are more my type
Welcome, fren.
We fight for God and freedom here, even if some of us are not even believers!
Big same
Vibe is much better here
Not sure what that means I mean, one or two of us here visit about 30 times a day when you think about it.
Sounds great but 2mil of those 2.5 are me. My bad.
That’s just it. They’re repeat clicks. I’d be more interested in unique IP visits.
How many members are active now?
Not entirely sure about which tools to use to analyse greatawakening.win traffic. Not even a novice in this area.
But considering that GA.win doesn't have a clear subscriber number, etc, or traffic indicator, I thought I'd look it up.
Seems like GA.win is not quite as small as I thought.
Would love for some techanons to flesh this out and let us know just how populous greatawakening.win really is:
i.e. Unique views? Unique visitors?
I didn't even know that .wins have subscribers. Do they? I don't think so.
The subscriber reference was connected to r/greatawakening, which had specific subscribers.
Here's an archive of reddit traffic GA before it was axed. Not sure if this is comparable or not. I archived it for the hell of it and throw it out there from time to time.
https://archive.md/Axdp4
Yah, I found this two days ago, searching up on r/GA traffic. 1.7 million uniques per month, says to me 1.7 million unique users visited during that month. It's why they HAD to kill it.
Much enjoyed, takes me back!
Yes sir. I hadn't looked at it in a while. Link still works to original page. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9gm52s/a_peak_at_rgreatawakening_traffic_stats_from/?limit=500
That's all me lmao I can't get enough of it!
We need people to reduce time on this site as nd more time effecting change in their community Get off your bum and fight for freedom.
What an unfortunate remark. Obviously, a form of projection.
a) you are here. Why?
b) why do you assume that others here are NOT very actively engaged in the real-world fight for freedom and awakening?
Also, people browse during down time and at night. Because we want to make sure we have as much from the info stream as possible.
There is no reason to cut ourselves off from each other because of some flawed judgy statement about other people.
^this
I'm here because I'm addicted to this site. But I realize that much time spent here is time I am not using to fight the local cabal. I know some are fighting. I suspect most readers are like me and just being lazy non active readers.
Every time I have an opportunity...spontaneous conversations while in line, with clerks, with fellow shoppers, with fellow gas pumpers...I use the information and meme logic to spread the word. Old age slows some of us down physically so we use what we're physically able to do to move us forward, including refusing the vax and wearing a mask which means I have no access to church, the community of which meant a great deal. Please don't judge. We are all different and all have unique stories.
Realistically I cannot march but be assured that if it came to trying to march to save my grandbabie's future, I would be there. We're not there yet so spreading the word is what I can do.
Agreed! Quiet no more. Keeping our mouths shut and our opinions to ourselves in order to be polite is part of the reason that we are in this mess.
The communists were emboldened by little pushback, and we lost a generation of normies as they never heard an opposing view.
So I’m a no mask wearing, polite and gracious red-pill dispensary.
Thanks Stephanie.
This is why your comment was easy to spot as a projection. You're projecting YOUR experience here onto others, Even now, you 'suspect most readers'.
Based on what? Any evidence? I doubt it. Part of your addictive behavior would be a result of being so subjectively focused on your own experience and not being aware enough to see the rest of the world objectively.
I think your original comment would have made sense if you wrote it like this:
perhaps this content might help: How Childhood Trauma Leads to Addiction - Gabor Maté
also, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoppxgDTzUU
Best of luck, pede.
I like your rewrite and the video was beautiful too. However, I would still say both sentences are true. And of course it was a projection, but my projection includes not only an assumption your 80,000 visits to the site are correct, but also my observation that my very own city has allowed its school and city to become infiltrated by the cabal to do things leading to tyranny. Further, many have succumbed to shots designed to kill them out of a lack of initiative. So based upon the incredulous outcome of a town and a country allowing itself to be overtaken AND the fact more people aren't fighting it vociferously, I maintain my original stance--projection and all--that people would do better to spend less time reading this or other patriot sites and more time actually effecting change in their own local cities. I am not putting down the information on this site, by the way. But if even half the readers made active efforts to effect change in their own city rather than read greatawakening then we would see more resistance to the cabal than we are currently seeing. I stand by my assumption mathematically.
Haha.
Firstly, not just projection, but assumptions. And who knows, maybe you are right.
But, I can tell you, there were 400,000 people on the streets in my home town last month. There are PLENTY of people working in real world locations advancing the Great Awakening.
Um, ok. Not MY 80,000 visits. Again, you're assigning identity to the wrong thing. Also, the 80,000 visits may well be being done by 5000, or 10,000 individuals. That's the point; the data is not there, and I asked (or hinted) that if someone knows how to obtain more clear data, it would be welcome.
You're assuming that half of the readers here are NOT making active efforts, and that's based on.... YOU don't see things happening around you. But if you are NOT actively involved or engaged on the local level, would you even see those things?
No.
Not to be too harsh, but considering that a) you're displaying addictive behavior, by your own admission and b) you're NOT engaged in real-world local activity, by your own admission and c) your positing all sorts of reasoning, making assumptions, drawing conclusions that by and large all indicate a lack of real factual intake, it seems that you're basically far too stuck in your own head.
Making up a mental or intellectual construct of the world based on not much more than internal reasoning is generally NOT a healthy way or an accurate way to come to a balanced awareness of the world or your self. Maybe try to address that by dialing back on the thinking that you really KNOW what is going on, and question your own conclusions more. Humility, and an ability to be OK with NOT relying on your own understanding, these are signs of growth and a sign of health.
Anyway, I congratulate you for trying to make sense of what is going on. I think you've missed the point on a LOT of things, but hey, we're all at different stages of awareness.
I think that if you personally became more engaged on the real-world, and or local level action sphere, you're understanding of what is really going on will improve by leaps and bounds.
If you're general statement is, "There needs to be more and more action on the local level, at the real world level" then most would agree with that, I'm sure.
But you actually passed judgment on everyone else here, even while admitting that YOU are essentially the problem. Suggestion: Do something and engage for one month, then come back and talk about it. Then you might actually add something?
Good luck.
Well, Thank you for taking the time to respond. I guess we should just agree to disagree. For your info, I am engaged at the local level. I wouldn't form a conclusion about anyone based upon a few short statements. Seems like your conclusions about me are based upon even more scarcity of fact than upon which you believe I have drawn my own conclusions. But thank you for taking the time to draw up an in depth profile of what you imagine me to be. And please be mindful of believing you are more aware and contribute more than another person. You can think what you like. But I'm not interested in listening to it.
OK. hope there is no misunderstanding. I'm just going on your own comments about being addicted here and about not getting off you own bum and doing stuff. That's all.
But yeah, let's agree to disagree. No harm in that.
If any of my comments or feedback have not been helpful, then yes, please do discard it. It's intended to be helpful, not to bring you down or force something on you.
You know we can be on this site AND do our part in the fight, right? This site is an important source for news, ideas and perspectives that cannot be found anywhere else. How dare you encourage us to get off this site then admit you are "addicted". Better yet, Fuck You shill. And I'll add that i am comforted knowing this is a site of awakened free thinkers and not one of us will listen to a goddamned thing you have to say. Go back to Patriots.win
Wow, dude.
Is there any need to attack her? She's even admitted that she's addicted, and its clear that she has a problem. It was obvious her original comment was projection. Do you need to beat her up (verbally)?
Seems like you've got a lot of suppressed anger, and reacting to Stephanie (who is so clearly not a shill and simply a fellow human being who has a problem) would indicate you've got quite a few problems yourself (we all do).
I shared this with her: you might find it useful too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoppxgDTzUU
It starts off with this:
It's brilliant content, useful to just about anyone.
I have a short fuse. I won't apologize for it. I will watch you link as time allows.
You need to read the whole sentence. You missed the point. Perhaps because you are stoopid
At this point, they are stoopid.
I read your whole post. It was so bad you had to follow it up to save face.