Yep, just open up the 'ole Constitution and point to the section that gives government the right to inject us. Not there? Then oh well, next order of business.
The Swampreme Court lost its decision making authority when it threw out the Texas case on the grounds of "no standing"
Now of course that may have been necessary for "the plan", but until devolution concludes or however this finishes the Swampreme Court is an illegitimate authority.
The ONLY question that the SCOTUS justice’s should be asking is this:
Is a vaccine mandate constitutional?
Yep, just open up the 'ole Constitution and point to the section that gives government the right to inject us. Not there? Then oh well, next order of business.
Exactly. Federalism.
If it is not explicitly in the US Constitution it is reserved as a State decision.
But even then... We remain protected via the Constitution from our states as well. Not even they can force us to inject ourselves with this.
The Swampreme Court lost its decision making authority when it threw out the Texas case on the grounds of "no standing"
Now of course that may have been necessary for "the plan", but until devolution concludes or however this finishes the Swampreme Court is an illegitimate authority.
Conservatives: "We'll make our own decisions."
Liberals: "No no we have better ideas therefore you don't have a choice."
Now make the latter judges who can circumvent our representational law making process and you have SCOTUS.