I have been trying to make this precise point, that the SOLE purpose of the SCOTUS in this matter is deciding on the legality / constitutionality of the OSHA mandate, and that all other subsidiary parts in the argument (safety, setting policy, etc.) are irrelevant. Sadly, some people don't want to hear that, their fear is ratcheted up so high that they will accept any authoritarian to "save them."
This quote has become more and more relevant over the past few decades: "When small men begin to cast big shadows, it means that the sun is about to set.” — Lin Yutang
Alito was the one asking the better questions, Thomas seemed more neutral for the time being. But I get what you're saying, either one would be better than Kagan or Sotomayor.
But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
They are SUPPOSED to settle disputes over whether or not a law is in violation of the CONSTITUTION. They are not supposed to support or oppose legislation. That is the role of Congress....and The ladies of The View.
Not te mention her opinion was based on (or fabricated from) actual misinformation. Even the CDC head had to correct her (while still pushing the vaxx of course). Sotomayor's numbers were way off even compared to the bloated "official" numbers.
"The will of the people" is reflected in the way they vote (ideally you cheating bastards). The constitutionality is determined by the supreme court.
If this is a problem, it's revolution enacting.....and if they think the people wish to battle themselves or the military, they are wrong. If they think they will not, they are more wrong.
The very fact that Judge Jabba is still alive with that mass of blubber she calls a body should tell any rational human being what an absolute failure COVID is as a virus.
I cannot imagine this Pandemic ending without the SCOTUS deep state irreversibly implicating themselves.
I really hope not.
That'd be past the precipice, straight off the cliff.
Here's the latest example of scum https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/thomas-dilorenzo/stephen-breyer-is-corrupt/
Whatbwluld be the point of letting any of them survive?
Sorry if I've seen too many movies, but our enemy has shown that they will just press on and press on and press on.
You have to give them credit for their amazing persistence, at least.
That's why they all need to die.
Leave any of them alive, they will just restart all over again.........
I have been trying to make this precise point, that the SOLE purpose of the SCOTUS in this matter is deciding on the legality / constitutionality of the OSHA mandate, and that all other subsidiary parts in the argument (safety, setting policy, etc.) are irrelevant. Sadly, some people don't want to hear that, their fear is ratcheted up so high that they will accept any authoritarian to "save them."
This quote has become more and more relevant over the past few decades: "When small men begin to cast big shadows, it means that the sun is about to set.” — Lin Yutang
Alito was the one asking the better questions, Thomas seemed more neutral for the time being. But I get what you're saying, either one would be better than Kagan or Sotomayor.
But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
Yes, absolutely. Obviously we know how Sotomayor is gonna lean every time and should expect no less from Obummer's appointee.
They are SUPPOSED to settle disputes over whether or not a law is in violation of the CONSTITUTION. They are not supposed to support or oppose legislation. That is the role of Congress....and The ladies of The View.
Traitors
Not te mention her opinion was based on (or fabricated from) actual misinformation. Even the CDC head had to correct her (while still pushing the vaxx of course). Sotomayor's numbers were way off even compared to the bloated "official" numbers.
The fact that CDC head had to go on the news and correct the number shows how scared they are about their narrative crumbling.
We have no justice except that which we take for ourselves. I no longer consider myself part of this experiment.
She's an Obama puppet.
O’Bummer stooge...
"The will of the people" is reflected in the way they vote (ideally you cheating bastards). The constitutionality is determined by the supreme court.
If this is a problem, it's revolution enacting.....and if they think the people wish to battle themselves or the military, they are wrong. If they think they will not, they are more wrong.
The very fact that Judge Jabba is still alive with that mass of blubber she calls a body should tell any rational human being what an absolute failure COVID is as a virus.