Scientists literally disagree with other scientists all the time in the name of science. Your friend may be retarded.

If you are not a scientist and you disagree with scientists about science, it's actually not a disagreement. You're just wrong.

While I wholeheartedly disagree that this statement has any validity whatsoever, what about if you ARE a scientist and you disagree with scientists? Do you then measure how many exist on each side and then say "majority rules"? Is that how science works? No, that is how politics works (or rather, why it doesn't work). Science can't work like that. It is the very antithesis of science.

People have no idea what "science" is, even many scientists. This is because they have all been taught science by people who don't know what science is. This is because the Rockefeller's et al have funded all scientific endeavors for over a century. They have controlled all scientific information and more importantly, the curricula of all science programs and schools for all of that time.

Scientists are mostly clueless about science. Not all of them, but most. Based on the average understanding of what science is among scientists, and the very fact that the founding principle of science is to prove itself to be wrong (and it pretty much always succeeds, even if only by degrees), it would be completely idiotic to not disagree with scientists, no matter who you are, assuming you have an actual argument to present.

We should listen to scientists. We should listen to all arguments. Debate is how science works. If science can't stand up to debate, no matter what letters the debater has or doesn't have after their name, then it's not science, it's Religion.

If you disagree with agenda driven biased "scientists" about their " science"... You aren't wrong.

"Science" is most often wrong when it's agenda driven, politically biased and there is a profit motive.

You are just pointing that out.

And this is from a schoolteacher btw which is really sad

What is a scientist? I keep hearing about science and scientist but what do these words actually mean.?

The media bandies this term 'scientist think' probably an oxymoron but never define the field expertise etc the apparent commentator is working in. Its like the old soap powder ads with men in lab coats!

My brother who is a super librals has said this shit too. That they are not wrong but had a "evolution of opinion". I shit you not.

"There's only one way to learn if following lemmings off a cliff is a good idea." -Science

How do you argue with such stupidity?

Retards

Many of the world's true advancements in "science" were made by people who were NOT "scientists," because those are the people who don't have outside agendas, etc., to risk.

Sooooo ask your deadshit friend if they agree with Dr. Robert Malone or not... and see what shitbrained come-back they pull out of their obviously retarded asshole.

Science is only for smart people, and the government told us we’re not smart enough to think for ourselves.

You cannot fix stupid.

You’re friends on fb?🤔 I’m wondering why you would post this here? Seems like you’re just trying to circulate it handshake?

Trust the soyance

Setting the stage for plausible deniability.

'We didn't know'

...

Won't hold up though, cause they CONSTANTLY admonished and pressured us to 'trust the science', pushed 'untested' gene therapies on the population via coercement of losing income or 'priveledges' like simply existing in society.

My middle school science teacher said we are all scientists

That only works if both sides of the science is truthful and not silenced.