.....
Has the "common cold" actually been a long series of corona viruses in a continuing pattern of ever evolving mutation?
Not simply one consistent strain? As in, "I've got a cold."
Have we actually been having a different variant of the "cold" virus each and every time?
If so, does that show that new variants of corona virus have been with us for many years?
If this is the case then it would seem that the main difference between today's cv19 mutations and cold and flu viruses of the past is the widespread promotion.
Preaching to the choir, I know.
Just thinking through some ammunition to help the uninformed on their way.
If this can be shown it seems like it could be a powerful argument.
Thank you for reading.
.....
Yes
I thought everyone knew this
I have from the start, but there are soooo many people sleeping and or brainwashed that it needs to be repeated.
u/Nightcereus is absolutely correct. A bit of context necessary, supplied below, is that colds are most often rhinovirus (maybe 70%) and then coronavirus is probably second (maybe 20%).
More important: WP teaches us there are seven coronaviruses and we've been tracking them about 100 years. Four of them are common cold, are everywhere, and nobody does anything about them: OC43, HKU1, 229E, and NL63. To get the virus name put "HCoV-" in front of each; the disease name is common cold. But we could just as easily call it COVID-229E or the like. These 4 are so established that nobody even bothers to distinguish which of the 4 you have or whether it's a rhinovirus.
The other three are SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 (the COVID-19 one). SARS and MERS are deadly but not very contagious (thank God). But notice how they deliberately named the new mutant after SARS even though it operates exactly like the four common cold coronas?
I propose that when anyone gets the cold we call it the "common covid" because even if it's actually rhino we are still classifying "coronavirus disease" as nothing deadly if it's not SARS or MERS.
I propose that when discussing the virus name we call it what DARPA called it: not SARS-CoV-2, but SARSr-CoV-WIV, and tell people what WIV stands for.
I propose that when anyone mentions COVID-19 we say "no, probably COVID-229E" and explain the difference between common covid and the noncontagious respiratory virus (SARS/MERS). This is especially useful for symptomatic people with "negative COVID-19" tests.
And that great talking point below: You never get the same cold twice; you never get the same covid twice. Now all the effort goes into good immune system and healthy practices and responsibility, and questioning authorities who forum-slide you away from those.
Excellent information. Thanks very much.
Yes, I clearly remember learning in biology that ‘common cold symptoms’ are our immune system’s response to coronaviruses and rotaviruses infections. They are not viruses to be feared unless they have been engineered via gain of function or unless you have a severely compromised immune system. They are ubiquitous and they are always with us.
The cold viruses mutate often. Most coronaviruses mutate often. You never catch the same cold twice. I thought this was common knowledge (even before the plandemic).
"You never catch the same cold twice."
Thank you.
The whole reason they never invented a vaccination for the cold or flu was because the mutation rate was so high the vaccine would constantly be out of date. Then they started trying annual flu vaccines, which i have always considered ludicrous. Now they are doing cold vaccines, and pretending the mutations are a shock nobody could have foreseen
It is interesting that in the last 10 years or so that anytime I had a cold or got sick the doctors could not figure out what it was and there was nothing they could do about it. But now, they can figure out that it is Covid right away and what variant it is. Give me a fkn break, these mfrs are not that smart. I call bullshit...again...and again......
Well... Personally Ive always suspected this was around way longer than late 2019.
This could move back when it was actually released by up to almost a year and a half earlier than the official dec 2019 timeline:
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En8WKAR/new-pentagon-papers-show-covid-i/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En8VEVE/darpa-whistleblower-confirms-pen/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En7P1m7/-lawrence-sellin-new-pentagon-pa/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En578jv/the-implications-here-exceed-tho/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141EnAoDjd/bombshell-veritas-documents-reve/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En9ezs0/-bombshell-veritas-documents-rev/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En7NenX/project-veritas-obtained-never-b/c/
Sort of. Like 30 percent of common colds are caused by coronaviruses. The majority (50 or 60 percent) are caused by rhinoviruses. I think there is a third type in the mix making up a scant minority. But coronaviruses have always been around and always been associated with colds
Early in 2020, a German researcher published some interesting results.
Every year, the Germans try to isolate and count the number of viruses people get, what symptoms, etc...
In 2020, the researcher published that there were new, but unremarkable, coronaviruses, and that they had no more significant health effects than previous years.
In short, one of these scenarios happened in 2019/2020:
Either way, the so-called covid tests were complete bunk from the beginning. I could've told you that just looking at the earliest graphs that were released when testing became available. When people with symptoms have the same positivity rate as people without symptoms, you are just detecting random noise.
Anyway, with access to all the data available, in its raw form, and accounting for the fact that the CDC admitted, a LONG time ago, that only 6% of people who die WITH covid have 1 or fewer co-morbidities (and thus could perhaps be due to covid), you would find the mortality rate per infection is in line with the common cold, which makes it much less dangerous than the flu.
But again, you could've looked at the mortality rate along with the age of the people who died and figured that out. In 2020, I was telling my friends my proof that getting covid means you will live longer, because that was what the data was saying. If you tested positive for covid, you were less likely to die in 2 weeks than if you did not.
You didnt even have to look at the earliest graphs to know the tests were bunk because the inventor already said they were before that...
Thank you.
Yeah sure… and the first one was immaculately created. Sorry, but I’ve completely stopped believing in the whole contagious respiratory model. How has anyone ever known if the ‘virus’ was the flu or the cold? Oh well the flu you’re in bed, and with a cold you’re not. These things are never diagnosed by observation of viruses in a location equal to those in a host. No they’re assumed to have been there because ‘everybody knows that when you have a respiratory condition that the cause was the only cause - a virus’. It couldn’t possibly simply be that when you become emotionally or physically unwell you get a respiratory condition… no it has to be that there were invisible viruses in the location, which evolved from some initial virus which came into existence by magic. It’s a great story.
Yes. All of our colds are either coronaviruses or rhinoviruses. Something like 35-40% C to 65-60% R.
From wikipedia:
No.
Yes
You guys are outstanding! Thank you. Now to make the others understand...
I think it's the flu.
https://postimg.cc/Ln0BBgR2