Who needs to go first ..??
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Its nit a competition. They can all go first!
Not AOC. She is the gift that keeps on giving.
The rest of them, good riddance.
Gallows, or a brick wall, can accommodate all of them at the same time.
Consider the optics.
Gallows will be awkward given how many treasonous African-Americans will need to be judged and we definitely can't use gas because 80% of the Democrat Party leadership are Jewish, not to mention most of the mainstream news media and social media CEOs and most of the Cabinet are either Jews or have Jewish partners and children.
Can you imagine history books showing our first African-American President and our first African-American First Lady swinging from ropes or the entire all the Democrat Party Impeachment Managers and everyone they called to testify against President Trump (they were all Jews, every last one of them) all piled on each other in a gas chamber? Awkward!
Brick wall would be best.
Why can' t we use gas? Should we use a concoction of a modern Joseph Mengele? See, there is nothing you can put in place, that would not trigger so called: the "anti-semite" sentiment.
The bizar thing is political bitch Sigrid Kaag ( married to palestinian AL Caq; yes it is exactly as it sounds: kak = shit)) accuses FvD leader Baudet to be an anti-semite, despite the fact he is married to a Jewess, his most important financial advisor is a Jew.
Before we go into claiming these type of labels, first it needs to be proven they are semites. Right? For an anti-semite sentiment to exist, it needs to be directed at semites, is it not? By the same token they may be Ashkenizim, and then we have a different can of worms. No semites at all. Of course, that is a hush topic.
Our difficulties in life never come from people who actually produce a material good and trade in that. If you wish to challenge this assertion, think: a restaurant owner, a farmer, a mom and pop shop providing goods and services to a community, a transporter, etc. The problem arises when we go into abstract territory.
IT. Medicine, philosophy, politics, news, opinion, finance, etc.
I do not have to argue this point. When even the establishment of a homeland has not solved the Jewish question, what will?
Certain people simply should never have access to these realms I mentioned, as they are not moral people. Why? They tend to centralize things under the guise of lofty sounding ideals, whereas the actual agenda is Babylonian Talmud.
I my uncle and aunt are Semites. And on occasion I love to entertain a Friday meal to celebrate the beginning of the sabbath, and hear their son inaugurational prayer. But it exemplifies my point: our difficulties are not related to people who actually produce something of actual value.
By the same token: law is not of actual value when it surpasses day to day usefulness. It is merely a response to a process that moves towards complexity.
I happen to think, when we would all de-digitze our lives, so basically: analogize our lives, we would be better off. Interestingly, SCHWAB, a typical ashkenazim Name promotes the fourth industrial revolution, a far reaching digitization of our live and person. It had no actual value. Yet, he is very powerful. And many people listen to what he has to say.
Clearly, he is not a moral man, yet he has co-opted and subscripted the cooperation and dependence of many European politicians and big-corporate sponsors.
Taking these people out, would alleviate immediately some of the consequences. But the real culprit?
We have forgotten who we are.
Pelosi. She’s been at it the longest!
Nancy. Brother F&$@?!, glassses , AOC last.
Anyone vote for Schumer? Fauci? Shifty Schiff?
I still want to strip that C you next Tuesday Lois Lerner of her pension and retirement benefits
They are all disgusting!
Let them all swing together, 4 turds with one rope, daisy chain hanging.
Seniors always go first. Respect your elders heathen