When Camp Constitution submitted an application to celebrate the federally recognized Constitution Day and raise a flag in order to celebrate Boston’s rich Judeo-Christian heritage and the Christian community, the application was denied simply because it used the word “Christian.”
For 12 years, from 2005 to 2017, the City of Boston encouraged “all applicants” to apply for use of the city’s “public forums.” Individuals and groups alike could fill out a permit application to reserve the square and one of the flagpoles to conduct their private events. Over the years, hundreds of permitted events have taken place on the square and at least 284 separate private flags have flown on the designated pole.
Some of the private flags were Boston Pride, Metro Credit Union and many representing Boston’s diverse communities. The Chinese Progressive Association raised the flag of the People’s Republic of China to openly celebrate the genocidal leader Mao Zedong, who butchered more than 65 million people in his quest for power.
But, Boston, the “Cradle of Liberty,” denied Camp Constitution’s flag during Constitution Week because of one word on the application—the word “Christian.” A Boston commissioner testified that had the flag been called anything but Christian, the same flag would have been approved.
Liberty Counsel sued the City of Boston on behalf of Camp Constitution, and I will personally argue this case before the U.S. Supreme Court TOMORROW, Tuesday, January 18, at 10 a.m. ET.
This case will set national precedent in the fight to stop the silencing of Christian viewpoints and speech.
Now that the City of Boston is being sued for obvious religious discrimination, the city is attempting to claim that if it approves an application with the word “Christian,” it would be establishing a religion. If granting a permit to raise a flag is “endorsement” as the city now claims, then Boston endorses several questionable historical events—including Mao Zedong’s genocide campaign—but an application with the word “Christian” is not allowed!
The fact is, there is a crucial difference between government endorsement of religion and private speech in a public forum.
An amicus brief submitted by 12 states supporting our position rightly notes, “This is a case about religious discrimination masquerading as government speech.”
In addition to the 12 states supporting our case against Boston’s clear discrimination, the United States has also filed an amicus brief in support. Nine (blue) states and the District of Columbia have filed a brief opposing us. This case has caught the attention of the nation.
Censoring religious viewpoints in a public forum where secular viewpoints are permitted is unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment.
If we lose, then any government could censor religious viewpoints and speech in any public forum, from the city square to the National Mall. Please be in prayer for a good result.
After nearly two years of fighting tyrannical governments that criminally charged and arrested pastors for opening their churches, and now fighting abusive shot mandates, a loss in this case would allow cities, states and the federal government to silence Christian viewpoints at will.
We CANNOT allow bigots to continue eliminating Christian viewpoints from the public square, nor can we allow them to effectively enact “religion free zones” in this country that was founded upon Judeo-Christian values.
We need your help to stop the silencing of Christianity.
Since early 2020, we have fought for the rights of courageous pastors and parishioners against COVID restrictions, while keeping cities and states from shutting down, seizing and even destroying churches that chose to exercise their RIGHT to religious freedom and freedom of assembly. And we continue to fight Joe Biden’s unlawful shot mandates and so much more in courtrooms across America.
“You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 5:14-16).
Mat Staver Founder and Chairman Liberty Counsel
P.S. Don’t forget! You can WATCH LIVE as we argue before the Supreme Court tomorrow, Tuesday January 18, at 10 a.m. EST: lc.org/.
Sources:
Morgan, Ryan. 2019. “Communist China’s Flag Raised above Boston City Hall Plaza, Philly; Supported by Elected Officials.” American Military News. October 8, 2019. Americanmilitarynews.com/2019/10/communist-chinas-flag-raised-above-boston-city-hall-plaza-philly-supported-by-elected-officials/.
“USA and 12 States Support LC in Free Speech Case - Liberty Counsel.” 2021. Liberty Counsel. Lc.org/newsroom/details/112421-usa-and-11-states-support-lc-in-free-speech-case.
Wow. You can BELIEVE we will be praying for you!! All the words of encouragement aren’t enough, but “YOU’VE GOT THIS”!! You can also BELIEVE you will be strengthened with a guardian of Angels. Let there BE light!! 💕😇🙏 Edit; I grew-up in Boston area, and more power to all the Conservative New Englanders that hold strong! I could never stand to be surrounded by Ted K sycophants when young, much less now. I miss it there tho…well I miss the Cherrystones!
Sorry if it was unclear - it’s not me but Matt Staver - founder of Liberty Counsel who will be arguing before the Supreme Court. :-) I just reposted his email - apologies for any confusion! :-)
Aye, this is important! Stickied.
Tonight Andy Ngo and James O Keef (no clue how be spells it tbh) are gonna be on pim tools podcast. I know we've kind of left him behind after he accidentally red pilled Adam and gave him the boot but I'm thinking it will be worth checking out due to those guests.
If the Rainbow Squad can fly their flag worshiping anal sex, homosexuality, lesbianism and other obamanations, then we can fly any flag we like -- ESPECIALLY a flag that honors the God Father, Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit.
AMEN BROTHER !!!!!!!!
This is awesome! One of our very own arguing in the lions den!!! Good luck and God bless you!
Sorry if it was unclear - it’s not me but Mat Staver - founder of Liberty Counsel who will be arguing before the Supreme Court. :-) I just reposted his email - apologies for any confusion! :-)
Raising a Christian flag to celebrate Constitution Day feels very contradictory to the First Amendment...
Government buildings should remain a-religious. And government in general should do the same as well. There is great wisdom in separation of church and state. We are a free nation. Not a Christian theocracy. For that we would have used the Bible as the Supreme Law and that would settle that argument. But the founding fathers did the opposite. And for good reason. Look how well the marriage of church and state is working out for countries that do that. Believe it or not, there is no theocracy in the world that is of a benefit to the human race... and rightly so. If you have to force the issue it's fascism. And at that point it robs the people of choosing Christ for themselves.
So I think a lot of people are putting stake in this for the wrong reasons. The reason I stopping being a Conservative is because when it comes to issues that support their values, but are unconstitutional, they'll still support them cause of "muh religious convictions" and that's not right. At all.
I am with you but have seen the bad side of the coin from the Freedom from Religion group. There was a cadet at the Air Force Academy who had a prayer inside his dorm room pinned to his cork board where cadets are allowed to post personal items. He was ordered (along with all the cadets) to remove the prayer because they declared the entire dorm is a government facility. Here's this guy, going through the grind...all he wanted was to look at a quote / something inspirational and spiritual that was important to him and the Freedom from Religion foundation robbed him of the small scrap of free speech that he's allowed as a military member. Fuck that. Freedom of religion is a key part of the 1st amendment. We need to ensure that we still preserve the things that make us American by not eroding our citizens' civil liberties out of a sense of being overly polite. Civil liberties is just the codification of human rights through the constitution and various laws. The inspiration for our entire government was the protection of God given rights. Freedom of religion is one of those rights.
We’re a Christian nation founded on Christian ideals and principles- it’s why when swearing into office you do so ina Bible - it’s why our founding fathers held actual mass in Congress weekly. We are not truly separated- that’s a new concept. Besides - how is a gay pride flag any different from a Christian one? Do gays not subscribe to beliefs and mores similar to those held by a religion? One doesn’t have to attend a church or even subscribe to any dogma to be considered religious- it’s essentially defined as whatever you believe. So I do not see how a gay pride flag can be flown but not a Christian flag.
I am praying for you and all of you I know God is with you during this battle. Thank you Delph373.
Funny my Christian flag is flying atop the US flag as it always has been. Always figured God coming before country is self evident.
I can't get excited about this and the courts are about to lose a ton Of power when legalese is challenged with the new factual quantum grammar.
If you only knew how weak courts really are. Especially the lower courts who run by the barr is a scam. Lawyers are purveyors of fiction and you only enter court by your own consent, wither bybsigning a notice to appear or hiring a lawyer. At that point you give away most of your rights and ability to win. A notary public outranks a judge as they are actually Deputy Secretary of States. Those notarizations are much more powerful if used properly than most know. Man I wish I could put what I've learned here. It won't fit. But it's coming.
I know many lawyers who are not even aware of this stuff. Total dumbasses amd you sue them federally, it works because they can not prove their lies.
THANKS FOR THE HEADS-UP....looking forward to your "argument"... https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shurtleff-v-boston/
WILL IT BE ON C-SPAN? would love to listen to it....JUST SAYING :-) good luck and God speed....
Here’s the link to podcast on what case entails - scroll down to podcast titled “Mat Staver Will Speak Before SCOTUS Defending Religious Viewpoint”
As he states - this is about FAR MORE than flying a Christian flag - this is about Christianity and what it essentially represents being BANNED from the public forum. This case will have serious repercussions as what’s being argued ripples across all public forums. You ban a Christian flag for “triggering” liberals, you open up Pandora’s box to allow for banning of Christian speech of ALL kinds.
Learn more below via this quick 10 min podcast:
http://libertycounsel.blubrry.com/
Judeo-Christian
Why wasn't " Judeo " and " Christian " flagged ?
I despise Massachusetts... They turned my 13 year old daughter into a piece of gutter filth with no sight of her ever coming back to me...
Sorry the schools here are the worst although there are some pockets of based individuals - but yeah as the home to Harvard and it’s ilk you can be sure the Elite run most of the state...
I'm sorry, but we don't need...wait, no I'm not. I'm not sorry. At all.
We DON'T need any type of fucking government telling us what we can fly on our own property, or how we decorate it, etc!! Separation of Church and State was only meant for legislators making laws, not flying a flag on some flagpole in some public square somewhere.
This shouldn't even be a SCOTUS case.