When 911 happened there were so many questions, so many suspicions I had, but all my friends just slapped me down when I asked how jet fuel can melt steel beams and being young and stupid I just accepted it and moved on.
I remember that day very well I was in my shop in Robert's Montana. The whole time it was happening I was thinking Bush did this. I can't explain why I thought that but I did.
Wow, you were way ahead of the curve. For me it was "Muslims did this", "Jews did this", "FBI/CIA did this", "Deep State did this" and finally "Bush did this !"
and me.. I knew the CIA was involved along with other agents. I've seen perfect demolitions in vegas. Those building were all controlled demo.. and it never made sense on aluminium planes could go thought STEEL.. and it never made sense that it that steel would melt with FUEL from an exploding plane.. (EVEN jet fuel burns off quite quickly.. not enough to burn STEEL!!!)
I grew up around aircraft .. My dad worked for PRATT and Whitney, GD/LOCKHEED and it just didn't make sense.
Don't ignore REAL science. Those building [especially tower 7] didn't go down with an aluminum aircraft.. it's illogical.
It's like having aluminum foil ball thrown at a pave stone wall with a small payload of fuel. it's retarded
Fire protection engineer here. That’s not what happened or claimed what happened. The UAlaska study seems valid that the NIST study was wrong, but they only claim that from an engineering calculation standpoint. The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack. They didn’t demo the buildings, but more than likely they were targeted attacks by our own government based on science.
The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack.
Oh, I am aware this was what was claimed in the 911 report. I find these claims like these dubious. No matter what the design flaw is, there are too many variables in an attack by a jetliner. The amount of fuel. The exact point of impact, etc etc. Even if the probability of such an attack succeeding was high, it would not be the basis of planning.
When you look at this from a bigger lens of recently declassified reports that show just how much support the would be attackers got from FBI and CIA, its undeniable that it was at the very least deep state was behind the planning of the attack.
If DS was behind it, they would never let a good tragedy go to waste. They would leverage it in multiple ways. Collecting insurance money, passing patriot act, starting wars - all that is good, but they would never pass on the opportunity to get rid of any evidence they wanted gone at the same time.
So, its very hard to believe the deep state would take chances on a "design flaw" that makes it the "perfect target" for crashing in with a jet liner. Just to be sure they would have setup demo charges.
I was in college when Waco and Ruby Ridge happened. I thought the feds were going to use Y2K as an excuse to implement the Patriot Act after the public refused to be convinced to give up their freedoms after the OKC bombing (likely false flag), but I was off by a year.
I feel like I’ve been awake since I first learned about building 7
When 911 happened there were so many questions, so many suspicions I had, but all my friends just slapped me down when I asked how jet fuel can melt steel beams and being young and stupid I just accepted it and moved on.
Remember the flight instructors saying how much those guys sucked as pilots and how they didn’t speak the languages they were supposed to? Lol.
I remember that day very well I was in my shop in Robert's Montana. The whole time it was happening I was thinking Bush did this. I can't explain why I thought that but I did.
Hello Robert's Montana, from Powell Wyoming.
Wow, you were way ahead of the curve. For me it was "Muslims did this", "Jews did this", "FBI/CIA did this", "Deep State did this" and finally "Bush did this !"
Yea, funny how all of these conspiracy theories are coming true.
and me.. I knew the CIA was involved along with other agents. I've seen perfect demolitions in vegas. Those building were all controlled demo.. and it never made sense on aluminium planes could go thought STEEL.. and it never made sense that it that steel would melt with FUEL from an exploding plane.. (EVEN jet fuel burns off quite quickly.. not enough to burn STEEL!!!)
I grew up around aircraft .. My dad worked for PRATT and Whitney, GD/LOCKHEED and it just didn't make sense.
Don't ignore REAL science. Those building [especially tower 7] didn't go down with an aluminum aircraft.. it's illogical.
It's like having aluminum foil ball thrown at a pave stone wall with a small payload of fuel. it's retarded
Fire protection engineer here. That’s not what happened or claimed what happened. The UAlaska study seems valid that the NIST study was wrong, but they only claim that from an engineering calculation standpoint. The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack. They didn’t demo the buildings, but more than likely they were targeted attacks by our own government based on science.
They were demo’d. The smoking gun was high grade thermite dust all over everything, everywhere.
Oh, I am aware this was what was claimed in the 911 report. I find these claims like these dubious. No matter what the design flaw is, there are too many variables in an attack by a jetliner. The amount of fuel. The exact point of impact, etc etc. Even if the probability of such an attack succeeding was high, it would not be the basis of planning.
When you look at this from a bigger lens of recently declassified reports that show just how much support the would be attackers got from FBI and CIA, its undeniable that it was at the very least deep state was behind the planning of the attack.
If DS was behind it, they would never let a good tragedy go to waste. They would leverage it in multiple ways. Collecting insurance money, passing patriot act, starting wars - all that is good, but they would never pass on the opportunity to get rid of any evidence they wanted gone at the same time.
So, its very hard to believe the deep state would take chances on a "design flaw" that makes it the "perfect target" for crashing in with a jet liner. Just to be sure they would have setup demo charges.
Interesting concept I haven’t heard before. I’ll check that study.
I was in college when Waco and Ruby Ridge happened. I thought the feds were going to use Y2K as an excuse to implement the Patriot Act after the public refused to be convinced to give up their freedoms after the OKC bombing (likely false flag), but I was off by a year.