The Keystone removed with the 17th Amendment !!!
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
You have a point about concentrated populations. I don't know what we do about that.
I contend we do not have blue cities, we have stolen elections.
Ding ding ding
No. There are true believers. I’ve spoken to way too many of these idiots. They really tow the party line and they’re not few in numbers.
And the older ones actually go vote
There is truth to what you say, but just as important to remember is what Kari Lake says "Biden is president the way O.J. is innocent".
Yea for sure he stole the election no doubt. But not all blue cities are stolen. Some are legit crazy town. And the problem is the common sense normies in those town could probably tip things a bit more red but 1. They don’t vote 2. They’re fence sitters with no true opinions 3. They watch to much MSM news, entertainment and influencers.
Having said that…without cheating they wouldn’t win the state. I don’t think
But will they when truth is brought to light?
I’d like to know too …let’s see what happens ™️
Exactly. Pay less attention to symptoms and look at root causes. EVERY SINGLE TINY BIT of our problems stem from two things.
#1 - We allowed them to corrupt the education of our children.
#2 - We allowed them to cheat in elections.
You fix those two things and everything else will fix itself.
As a side note the 16th Amendment was a much greater blow to freedom than the 17th.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The government needed a way to make money/tax the people. So we handed them a blank check and they told us... don't worry it will only be 1%. The bill of rights is a set of negative rights. The government can not do XYZ to you. That same sort of limitation needs to be added to the 16th. It doesn't need to be repealed but it needs some sort of limitation put on it.
If we limited how much money they could barrow and how much they could take from us then the government would have 1/10th the power it does today and would be half its current size. Instead we spend every election cycle arguing over tax hikes or reductions while they grow large and larger plus put us in so much debt we might never pay it all off.
Article 1 Section 9 Clause 4: No capitation or other direct, Tax shall be laid unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken. Property taxes are direct taxes as are income taxes. The 16th Amendment goes against the Constitution and is therefore null and void--as are most, if not all, after the 10th Amendment.
^^ This. Quite possibly true.
I have mixed feelings about that. I used to believe this, but then look at outfits like blackrock and others, buying up every inch of real estate they can. The bad guys are always brilliant at gaming the system.
However, something other than what we currently have - where it's nearly virtually a 'free for all' system. Perhaps supported by those who pay into and support the system, and not those who drain it. Still, there would be issues like the elderly and disabled. It's a hairy situation.
That behavior wasn't taken lightly in the old days. we need to stop forgetting who tells who what to do. if they don't behave as they should i leave it to the populace to decide what happens. these people need to stay right where they are. they begged to be servants, it is high time that we treat them. it shouldn't matter who is in office. they got protection, remove it. they have no claim to such as a right. they willfully choose this life for themselves, begged others for money to convince us to let them serve us... remove everything that they have convinced the past to give to them. if they "work" they get to eat ;)
I like this idea.
God had a few good ideas about that:
Other people have suggested weighting counties. There is nothing that won't be gamed by an opposition though, that I can think of.