My pregnant wife's rona meds recommend avoiding the vaxxed.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
I avoid liberals at all times.
Since it's on prednisone, that's because corticosteroids decrease your immune response.
It's a new warning though, for sure. Never seen it before.
Quiet admission of the vax's danger
Yeah, but its not a live vaccine.
So you kinda misread that one.
Live vaccines actually have some portion of the living virus within them. That's why vaccinated folks can "shed".
These c19 injections are not live vaccines. They are gene manipulation "therapies". Technically, injected people don't shed, because why? because there is no live vaccine in what they get. They may transmit, etc, the spike proteins, but them proteins ain't the virus either.
It's the bioweapon.
This caution is just simple, plain normal science, and is unrelated to the c19 pseudo-science bulldust.
PS. Congratulations. Prayers for everything to go smoothly.
This. Nowhere on the label does it say anything about covid shots.
Thanks! This will be our 6th :)
Yes, but "newly vaccinated person?" Also both Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca use Adenoviral vectors which "are genetically engineered forms of the virus." (Sauce) I would think that qualifies as live.
Hey!
"newly vaccinated person" simply means "person who has recently been vaccinated". I.e. within the past 2 or 3 weeks, as opposed to 6 months ago. That's because actual shedding has been observed in the past with real vaccines.
As for the J&J, and AZ, as far as I know, the live virus hasn't even been isolated anywhere.
All they have is generated models of the 'the virus' obtained from genetic fragments, and the injections are based on these. But, hey, have you seen the models that the human-created climate change are based on? Models are like the polls of the science world, imo. It all depends on who's doing the modelling, and why.
"which encodes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Adenoviral vectors are genetically engineered forms of the virus. AstraZeneca codes the vaccine as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19."
even there, they claim "the virus". Do they have the virus? No. They have models. Heck, they even use the word "vaccines" for ALL of these products, when we know they aren't. Even Merriam Webster and the WHO decided to change the actual definition of "vaccines" in order that they can tout these products as "vaccines" instead of experimental "genetic manipulation therapies". How many normies would be taking these if the govt ro pharma were honest?
"These are not vaccines in the traditional sense. They are genetic manipulation devices or genetically engineered substances, which have never before been used on humans, but they are great anyway!"
Right?
Someone up above states "It's a new warning though, for sure. Never seen it before." But I'm really, really skeptical of that. I'd like to see evidence that its new, because its just basic medical knowledge that live viruses can shed. Been known since the 80's if I'm not mistaken.
It might not be conclusive, but check this info here: https://www.drugs.com/prednisone.html
Page says this was updated "Last updated on Jul 20, 2021". That's after the C19 injections were released. Notice how they are not included?
Just a word of caution about confirmation bias here. The information war has been white hot since Jan 2020. There was always an information war, but from the start of 2020, it went full-blown white hot constant war. Like the continuous carpet bombing of Dresden in WW2, except that with Dresden, it went for 3 days. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II)
The Info war has been like that, but for more than 600 days, non-stop, on one side, everywhere in the world, every corporate media outlet, every govt agency, controlled medical institution, etc. On the other side, alt media, whistleblowers, conscientious folks, and now millions and millions who joined the digital war after 2020. (Prior to this, the GA was essentially anons and q patriots,. mostly)
The fact is, while the narrative is cracking up and crumbling on the one hand, by and large ALL sides in the war are showing clear signs of information fatigue. Mass formation psychosis is real, but as far as I can see, the "awake" side is also suffering psychologically from the constant bombardment, chaos, and confusion.
Viruses don't exist! Viruses exist! C19 isn't real! C19 is real! C19 isn't dangerous! C19 is dangerous! Everyone is controlled opposition! 50% are controlled opposition! We are winning! We are losing! Simon Parkes! Lin Woods! Gen Flynn! Trump sending codes! Pompeo sending codes! I'm so comfy! Patriots are in control! Not comfy! We must fight! Local action! Vote! Never Vote! etd. On, and on, and on, and on.
Whew. OK, <taking a deep breath here>
The point is this: by analogy, it's easy to understand that in a world of constant bombardment of information, we are all affected psychologically one way or another. Our world IS at the precipice. Who can deny it? The point (which i am way belaboring probably) is that a lot of patriots, truth warriors and yes, us on the awakened side are STILL subject to prejudices and biases, desires. For some of us, its just as difficult as for the other side, because when you become convinced you know the truth, you often begin shaping things you observe to fit your view of truth, instead of observing, objectively, and going from there.
Example, Look on twitter. Go to the stream of any rabid anti-"anti-vaxxer". Read through the replies, posts, etc. I did this the other day,. and what was amazingly clear is that the entire method, interactions, comments are virtually symmetrical to the methods, interactions and comments on my own streams and friends who are awake. Both sides are convinced they know the truth! Both sides laugh at th ridiculous reasoning of the other side!
I'm not saying here that we are not awake. What I'm saying is that both sides are susceptible to the pitfalls of bias, prejudice and less than clear thinking, particularly in the psychologically fragile spaces we currently live in.
I'm writing this because you are having a child! (6th? Well done, sir, madam) and well, families deserve support and love.
I don't know how long you've been in this game - maybe much longer than I - maybe you're an old hand, maybe new. Actually it doesn't really make a difference.
However, particularly because "we are the news now" and because we ARE awake, we have to develop really powerful and healthy standards of mental discipline and practice, because the world is awash with both false information, and also false or deceptive feelings, too.
Many of us see much more than is there, because of our heightened sense of attention or the mere intensity of the world at the moment.
Myself, I'm very, very confident that, based on standard established medical knowledge, the warnings on some medication to steer clear of live vaccines has been there for a long time. Maybe they've changed it, and added the "live", in order to distinguish from the C19 genetically created stuff. But that's me.
We see stuff, we go "Look! Yep! See! Further evidence!" without even a second thought, or without checking our own thinking, methods or prejudices.
To me, probably the most significant element of the Q operation was the continual exhortations to avoid such pitfalls.
The latter quote Q posted 8 separate times.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this warning is new. Maybe it targets the c19 injections. But then, WHY would they even post that? Plausible deniability? Covering their asses?
All I'm saying is, be careful of confirmation bias. None of us are immune, and the choices we make each day on HOW we interact with the information sphere, and how we respond, react and process information, has consequences, for ourselves for our loved ones, and for our nations.
Have a great Day!
I read all your response, and I do believe you may be right. This caution very well could've been made prior to covid. I do believe I am, (like all of us with a fallen nature), prone to read signs under a bias perspective that can, and often has, lead to misinterpretations. And that is expeciallh true when it comes to "vaccines" in 2022.
I hope my post doesn't lead anyone to believe that it is a fact that the c19 jabs are shedding, and subsequently avoid jabbed people for that particular reason, as I'm sure they will find many other reasons. I believe that question will be uncovered in the near future as the effect of these jabs grow. I hope it only makes me eat my words on this one!
Regardless of whether or not this label was meant for covid jabs, what a shame it is that children are prevented from schools and daycares without vaccines. I wonder if there are any pre-covid med labels that warn people to avoid the unvaccinated. I doubt it! But, of course, am open to being corrected.
Thanks for your generous reply.
I quibble on such points, probably more than is necessary. There's no doubt that the C19 injections are bad news, and I agree, I think we're all more prone to confirmation bias after 2 years of relentless propaganda.
Either way, I hope the medication is effective for your wife, and that everything goes well.
Again, that's for generously replying to such a long diatribe!
No diatribe. We need to seek and convey the truth in all things. That is how God, the highest Truth, will lead us out of this mess.
Some sense. Thank you
The genocide-jabbed can also shed.
That's why the study protocols advised if a jabbed (study participant) were to have contact with (by contact or inhalation):
they had to report contact to the investigators within 24 hours.
Something gets passed around and it ain't good.
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
https://www.theundergroundchurch.ca/blog/skin-contact-covid
Thanks.
I'm not a physician or trained medical professional. With regards to "shedding" I'm going based on a discussion between Dr. Sheri Tenpenny and others that was held earlier last year, emphasizing that "shedding" is a medical term for live release of a virus someone has been vaccinated with. I'm not saying that those injected with active C19 injections (i.e. not saline or placebo) are not releasing agents into their environment (neither was Tenpenny or her colleagues), just that the term shedding doesn't accurately describe what is happening. (because the patient isn't injected with live virus). That's merely a terminology question.
I agree that there are indications that something is being passed around, but really, things are crazy, and it's hard to know what is what, except that you cannot trust either the governments or the Pharmas.
For the baby’s sake, I pray that you are both purebloods. 🙏
Yes we are :)
👍👫 👶🙏
I thought common sense was outlawed.
Interesting. May I ask what Pharmacy this label is from?
It's just our local small town pharmacy.
Also avoid them for mental health reasons
I always avoid vaccinated GMO human-things.
Never let them get close enough to bite you - their saliva is full of spike proteins!
And newly vaccinated people?
That's interesting!
Is it saying that 'vaccine shedding' is real? Or that it can be take like a virus or STD?
I didn't believe that one bit, but this box makes me wonder.
What is the name of the medicine?
The phenomena of "Shedding" has been an established medical concept since the 80's. Nothing new there.
"newly vaccinated people" simply means "people who have been newly vaccinated" in other words, "people who have recently been vaccinated", instead of say, 4 months ago, etc.
https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/shedding
Prednisone steroid
Yes! My friend was pregnant and she works at a small company. Everyone was vaxxed except her. So these other twelve or so people were around her all the time. She had a miscarriage. And she has four kids, so this wasn't her first rodeo. She is unvaxxed.
It says to avoid newly vaccinated people. It does not specify what kind of vaccines are of concern with the newly vaccinated people so that would include Covid vaccines. Vaccine shedding is a real thing. If there was nothing live in the Covid vaccines then they wouldn’t have been preserved cryogenically.
That's a leap. I think it's been established that the genetic structures they create to put in the injections (they are not "vaccines") or to protect the structures (i.e. the delivery systems - lipids, etc) are fall apart at certain temperatures.
I wasn’t implying they are live vaccines in the traditional sense but that there is something alive in them that is activated and grows once it is injected. Some have reported to have found parasites in some batches. Who knows what they could be doing! Human eggs and sperm are preserved cryogenically as an example of how cryogenics is used to preserve something alive. One thing is for sure to the best of my knowledge-vaccines of the past have never been required to be kept at subzero temperatures.
Yeah, I understand you didn't mean to say they were traditional live vaccines.
however, the genetic structures and genetic materials they are purported to have are sufficient justification for the temperature control. In other words, it's entirely plausible that the freezing exists only because of the genetic materials, and not because of anything else. So it's a logical leap to assert "because of freezing = must be "living" creature inside".
I've heard about parasites, and different things different people are asserting. It's an oceanic storm of information out there, and I'm very wary of simply latching onto this person or that person's theory or report without applying due diligence, critical thinking and empirical evaluation.
Is it possible they are sneaking something in with the freezing? Sure. Does the fact of the freezing mean there must be some living parasite or thing in there. No?
I mean, come on. This is serious science stuff here. Somehow, when 2020 occurred, everyone suddenly developed a keen focus on science, cos you know "trust the science" was so much bullshite. But that doesn't mean we can just cut corners, think we ARE experts, and develop half-baked theories not actually grounded on scientific discipline and principles.
To my mind, that's why People like McCulloch, Malone, Tenpenny, Madej, etc, are so important. They are actually looking at empirical data and working from a place of discipline.
I'm certainly not saying "trust the experts" but I AM saying, don't think you can just shortcut your way to being an expert because somehow, something that has always been intricate and evidence based discipline 'science' has changed.
That said, we know the injections are, by and large, bad news, and we also know the motives behind their promulgation are evil. A lot of the other 'facts' are up for grabs, in my opinion.
They mean MMR or varicella vaccines. These vaccines are not recommended for pregnant patients because they contain live attenuated viruses.
Yes, but "newly vaccinated person?" Has anyone ever seen this label precovid? Also both Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca use Adenoviral vectors which "are genetically engineered forms of the virus." (Sauce) I would think that qualifies as live.
Yes. Theoretically, those vaccinated with live vaccines can shed virus for a time which could cause disease. Seems most risk is with polio and with people who are immunocompromised. (Prednisone or other steroids reduce your ability to fight infection)
Who knows what happens with these new “therapies”.
What med?
Prednisone steroid. Our Dr would've prescribed Ivermectine but thought this would be better beings she's pregnant.
If she's pregnant, why are you giving her any drugs at all? Unless she's a fat fuck she'll probably be absolutely fine, especially given, "omnicron."
Easy man. She's had a bad head ache the last few days that seems to be getting worse. She's done a lot of natural remedies that haven't touched it. This steroid is apparently better for pregnant women than ivermectine. She wants to keep the little parasite alive and well :) Which is why we are also avoiding libs
When I was pregnant, my doctor prescribed low dose magnesium oxide for headaches/migraines in the pre-covid days.
However, when I had COVID, those headaches were the absolute worst, and NOTHING would help except sleep! She needs to drink A LOT of water. Maybe try something with electrolytes, but low sugar? COVID is so dehydrating. I was breastfeeding, but it completely dried me up. Not sure how far along she is, but I had issues with dehydration causing preterm labor. Push fluids!
I had a bad headache a few weeks ago including fever and a sore throat, never get sick. The headache was the worst. I don't normally have them, probably had whatever flu they're telling us is omicron.
The doc screened her for flu and others first as he doesn't want to pat the rona stats if he doesn't have too. But all were negative but the covid one
Thanks for the advice! She will drink more fluids!
.....”Live vaccines....”
No relationship with the Covid shots.... which are not ‘Live vaccines’..... indeed they even had to change the definition of the term’vaccine’ so the Covid shot would be classed as a ‘vaccine’...
Which is probably why this is a ‘new’ warning....
Though there is some evidence to suggest ‘shedding’ by the vaccinated... it specifically remains an open debate....
WWG1WGA
Yes, but "newly vaccinated person?" Also both Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca use Adenoviral vectors which "are genetically engineered forms of the virus." (Sauce) I would think that qualifies as live.
Yes, but does "newly vaccinated?" Has anyone ever seen this kind of label pre-covid? Also both Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca use Adenoviral vectors which "are genetically engineered forms of the virus." (Sauce) I would think that qualifies as live.
"newly vaccinated" means "recently vaccinated"
They aren't really humans. I would suggest avoiding werewolves too if they existed.