19
Comments (34)
sorted by:
11
TSearch 11 points ago +11 / -0

Can you imagine the effort being mounted to attackTruth Social when it comes online? There have to be armies of bots being programmed to make the site look bad. And most of them will be glowie operations pretending to be alt right groups. The AI protection makes sense.

6
ashlanddog [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

...this is what I am thinking also....

6
OneMoreTim3 6 points ago +6 / -0

This!

2
theW0knessHurts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with this. Torba from Gab just needs to chill out. Trump Truth Social is shielding him from scrutiny to actually build a platform for free speech based on Christian values for Christians to not be persecuted online. He needs to pipe down and just build his platform because he may actually succeed in building the Christian online economy, again let Trump shield you while you do your work. Sure I don't like the silicon valley as, but like u guys said it's gonna have an onslaught if attacks to make it look bad.

7
Sutton 7 points ago +7 / -0

hate speech

Truth never needs censorship to protect it.

5
QutlawJoseyWales 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are sites like 8kun, there are sites like this and then there is social media. They are for different crowds. The world cannot handle this level of truth.

3
Sutton 3 points ago +4 / -1

We are living through the Zionist World Order's cull of the human race.

A billion innocent men, women and little children will be dead within eight years because the banking goblins want to own everyone and everything.

The time for cry closets and safe spaces is over.

1
QutlawJoseyWales 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but we aren’t talking what people need. We are talking about the intersection of what there is actual demand for and what is healthy for a democratic republican society.

2
Sutton 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth isn't what people need?

Truth is harmful to democracy?

1
QutlawJoseyWales 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not what I said. You can’t shove it down their throat. Even truth. The chains were too Wild West for my taste. Doesn’t mean I’m not glad it’s there am I’m glad people digest it and relay the message here where it can be received in a more palatable form. I’m talking about marrying the truth to a profitable business model.

1
Blue-collar745 1 point ago +1 / -0

For smaller sites like this no, but this is Trump making a big social media site. We’ll need to censor the doxing and glowies. Truth needs censorship to protect it when going up against a totalitarian regime.

1
Sutton 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why can't we just debunk the Zionist lies, rather than censoring the truth?

1
Blue-collar745 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they’re censoring the lies. Could be a Youngkin situation where he says he’ll be a cuck but does what he promised anyway.

1
Sutton 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to see the lies so I can decide for myself.

Then I will debunk the lies AFTER I've researched those claims myself.

1
Blue-collar745 1 point ago +1 / -0

Research is pointless when we only know 20% of what’s happening. I want ANSWERS, not simple internet articles that I don’t know if I can trust.

4
Iceman80 4 points ago +5 / -1

No criticism of Israel lest you be banned? Where’s the fun in that?

NO CENSORSHIP!

4
Starseed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Freedom of speech allows you to speak. That doesnt mean people have to listen. If you start swearing and being an ass to someone in a public space then security is gonna kick you out. Same principle applies here and likely on TS too.

1
thephantom1979 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said.

Yes we can speak freely. But if I randomly go to a place and start calling people names.

There will be trouble for me/

4
magayd45 4 points ago +4 / -0

not buying this

2
Starseed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not even taking it for free

4
WhyAserverWasBuilt 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is nothing to do with telling the truth about government-run pedophile rings or electronic election shenanigans.

3
OGpat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Listen to Nunez here regarding vetting companies..

https://rumble.com/vt559i-devin-nunes-gives-first-interview-as-trump-media-and-technology-group-ceo.html

I’m not buying they’re going to use deep state AI. I could be wrong, but it doesn’t add up.

5
sosickofit 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree with you, it doesn't add up to me either.

2
1337XSS1337 2 points ago +2 / -0

It has nothing to do with free speech or honesty or anything of the matter.

It is a honeypot. IP's will be noted and those of a " Our Greatest Allies " nature will be exposed. Those who fund them and burn the chain ..... then we can have free discussion and civilized conversations

2
JulesW 2 points ago +2 / -0

As long as they just delete posts that violate policies instead of suspending or banning people. There are always ways to rephrase and get around AI shit systems.

Don’t get me wrong, I would rather have 100% free speech, but like people are saying, it would turn into what happens with every new bread on 8kun. Shit show.

2
ashlanddog [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

...exactly....

2
aumone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just a quiet thought here....

Regardless of the platform, it needs to have a way to make sure that the posts are NOT pedo, illegal, terrorist based, etc.

So, I do not have an issue with removing/monitoring those types of posts. Without it you open the platform to garbage and I, for one, am looking forward to an open platform that is, at the very least, TV14 based!

2
ashlanddog [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

...I think it is just some "publicity" to get chatter going...

...they will need some kind of "filters" to fight off the bots et al....

2
OneMoreTim3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel.we have been here before. Couldn't this just be another ruse to cement jurisprudence? They won't go after Twitter but they will Truth Social.

Imagine A bunch of bots and feds hop on making claims followed by a false flag and then Trump gets sued for the false flag.

1
ashlanddog [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly....

2
QutlawJoseyWales 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem isn’t the AI. The problem is the bias coded into the AI. Or am I missing something?

2
ashlanddog [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

...no, you are not....

1
Lamedeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

The. What is the point if it’s goin fro be censored? Twitter 2.0

1
ashlanddog [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

...it is going to be 5D "censoring"....