So the thousands of people who saw the planes hit the towers were all hallucinating? (I only watched the first few minutes of the video, and don't know if he can explain how people actually saw the planes)
But there were thousands who were standing in the streets of Manhattan, and over in NJ, looking across the Hudson, who saw the 2nd plane fly into the north tower, so if this video is trying to say there were not planes, it's preposterous. Not as many people saw the 1st plane hit, but hundreds did, and the camera shot looking south from the Empire State building, captured that happening, as well as the 2nd. People should concentrate on the bldg 7 collapse, because that was obviously not caused by planes, or debris, hitting it.
not true. when you actually dive into it, there are about 5-10 people who actually say they witnessed the plane hit the tower. There are DOZENS of interviews of people from that day who said "I saw the explosion but didn't know it was a plane until I watched it again on tell-a-vision"
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
If you are talking about the first tower hit; yes, unless you were outside and looking up, you would have only heard the explosion (including me, in a building a few blocks away). But the 2nd plane was watched by 10s of thousands of people. I was evacuating by subway train to Grand Central, so wasn't at street level when the 2nd plane hit. But my co-workers over in NJ watched it, as did the thousands in Manhattan outside staring at the south tower while it was burning.
Sound and audio quality? Give me a break. It's like people didn't actually live in the time or something, or they are so used to the modern day that they forgot what it was like to tour with a camera or spend time with your family with one, and what kind of quality raw audio and video on it could be.
Absolutely correct.
I had a nextel i1000 on 9/11.
The first phone I had capable of texting was the nextel i95. No keyboard you'd have to repeatedly hit the numbers until your desired letter came up. 2 pressed 3 times = C.
Smart phones weren't in existence then as well.
In 2001 not everyone had the internet in their home yet, and we were all on dialup.
Seems so. I find it hard to believe that this movement, which promotes critical thinking, has attracted scores of people who cannot use a single brain cell to the point where they resort to the most baseless and random conspiracy theories (clones, aliens, lizard people, time travel, intergalactic technology). Fucking reeks of glowie infiltration to make us look bad. If OP is being genuine, then they must be too young to realize that camcorders are a thing, and that most tourists carried one around when visiting NY. Heck, I remember my dad would take his camcorder whenever we would so much as go to the park and record home videos. Many of them looked and sounded better than this 9/11 footage. It's not rocket science, people.
People had good quality camcoders back then. It's a tourist state. Video quality would be better than some phone vids today. But probably really fishy. I'm not a tech person.
Idk how I’ve never seen this one, THANKS FREN!
After a closer look the video provided in your link is actually shot at a different angle than the video that OP provided.
For sure. It’s a joke to say oh look I found this footage 20 years later that I forgot about.
So the thousands of people who saw the planes hit the towers were all hallucinating? (I only watched the first few minutes of the video, and don't know if he can explain how people actually saw the planes)
listen to the end, the people say no plane, just explosion.. news reporter says we saw it on TV
But there were thousands who were standing in the streets of Manhattan, and over in NJ, looking across the Hudson, who saw the 2nd plane fly into the north tower, so if this video is trying to say there were not planes, it's preposterous. Not as many people saw the 1st plane hit, but hundreds did, and the camera shot looking south from the Empire State building, captured that happening, as well as the 2nd. People should concentrate on the bldg 7 collapse, because that was obviously not caused by planes, or debris, hitting it.
not true. when you actually dive into it, there are about 5-10 people who actually say they witnessed the plane hit the tower. There are DOZENS of interviews of people from that day who said "I saw the explosion but didn't know it was a plane until I watched it again on tell-a-vision"
Eye-witness saying no plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtHWlQgGZCI
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
If you are talking about the first tower hit; yes, unless you were outside and looking up, you would have only heard the explosion (including me, in a building a few blocks away). But the 2nd plane was watched by 10s of thousands of people. I was evacuating by subway train to Grand Central, so wasn't at street level when the 2nd plane hit. But my co-workers over in NJ watched it, as did the thousands in Manhattan outside staring at the south tower while it was burning.
It was most likely a camcorder, which tourists often carried. No phones had cameras in 2001.
or it is hastily doctored to create more noise..
Quality that is expected from raw video back then is not acceptable reasoning for this though.
Timing? Sure. Contents? Yep. Explanations given? Absolutely.
Sound and audio quality? Give me a break. It's like people didn't actually live in the time or something, or they are so used to the modern day that they forgot what it was like to tour with a camera or spend time with your family with one, and what kind of quality raw audio and video on it could be.
It's appearance is fishy.
Absolutely correct. I had a nextel i1000 on 9/11. The first phone I had capable of texting was the nextel i95. No keyboard you'd have to repeatedly hit the numbers until your desired letter came up. 2 pressed 3 times = C. Smart phones weren't in existence then as well. In 2001 not everyone had the internet in their home yet, and we were all on dialup.
That's right, the broadband roll out was taking place at that time. Youtube didn't exist for another 4 years.
Um why are you assuming he used a cell phone...?
Because they're dumb.
Seems so. I find it hard to believe that this movement, which promotes critical thinking, has attracted scores of people who cannot use a single brain cell to the point where they resort to the most baseless and random conspiracy theories (clones, aliens, lizard people, time travel, intergalactic technology). Fucking reeks of glowie infiltration to make us look bad. If OP is being genuine, then they must be too young to realize that camcorders are a thing, and that most tourists carried one around when visiting NY. Heck, I remember my dad would take his camcorder whenever we would so much as go to the park and record home videos. Many of them looked and sounded better than this 9/11 footage. It's not rocket science, people.
People had good quality camcoders back then. It's a tourist state. Video quality would be better than some phone vids today. But probably really fishy. I'm not a tech person.
You truly are an idiot.