Covid-19 deaths rose dramatically among the triple vaccinated over the past 4 weeks but fell among the not-vaccinated. So a “Super Booster” campaign may be coming to a town near you, much sooner than you think…
Oh, and don't forget nearly the all the high risk people are vaccinated and the majority of the un-vaccinated are young and thus low risk. Oh, but all those people should be vaccinated too!
Isn't this useless information unless we know how many people were vaccinated? If 20% are unvaxxinated but still account for 20% of deaths, then wouldn't that just mean the vaccine is neutral and not effective?
AT BEST. Precisely. Which would void all rationale for mandates and digital passport which is mostly what we are fighting against. We don't necessarily have to prove the vaccinated are dying en masses.
(Even though they are exhibiting increased rates of cancers and autoimmune disorders, etc... )
You're right about it killing the justification for the mandates, but they've got another insidious way to coerce you though. They'll claim their data shows less risk of hospitalization and death to the vaccinated, so they could change their Medicare and Medicaid rules to not reimburse any Covid related medical treatment and allow private insurers to do the same or to allow raised premiums on the un-vaccinated.
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
Considering the vaccines were supposed to protect people from hospitalization and death, you would expect 80%+ of the deaths to be among the unvaccinated.
That these numbers look like even distributions given the inferred vaccination rates shows the vaccines aren’t doing shit except causing clots and strokes for zero benefit.
I don't see the smoking gun here. Maybe someone can help me out?
The image of the chart (and the article Purkiss linked) says "Vaccinated" not "Fully Vaccinated", contradicting what the inserted commentary below it claims. According to the article, 92% of covid cases, hospitalizations, deaths have been from those who have had at least one dose. Coincidently, 92% of the UK population age 12 and over have received one dose.
Only 69.5% of the UK has recieved atleast 1 dose (numbers go down from there).
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
I haven’t read the report yet. Until I do so and actually examine in-group and cross-group characteristics/comparisons, I’m playing it safe and saying that the vaccines simply aren’t able to protect people like originally claimed.
If you haven't read the report yet then it makes sense to reserve judgement.
Forming and sharing an opinion off incomplete info is no better than spreading fake news...
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
The breakdown of vaccination—and the fact highest coverage is among the oldest age groups—makes me hesitant to say the vaccine killed them/produced worse outcomes because if Nana is 93, she’s far more likely to die from anything in comparison to, say, a 53 or 23 year old.
I’m not sure if the breakdown in the report goes into age groups specifically—I doubt it does, because the increase in mortality for younger people screws the narrative—but I’m hoping it’ll give me data for vaccinated/unvaccinated as well as an age group breakdown.
That’s why I can’t draw a conclusion from the headline—are we comparing similar demographics? Or did they just draw people out of a hat and shrug? Matched pairs would be ideal for this, but I guarantee we won’t get that kind of analysis on anything related to COVID or the vaccine.
Ideally 100% of the death and hospitalization would be the unjabbed. If the percentage stays constant regardless of status then it’s hard to claim any positive benefits at all. When you factor in the mystery deaths and sudden collapse or myocarditis, the experimental jab juice doesn’t stand out as a positive thing to take. I realize NPCs will rationalize the deaths as a sign that it is working. They may be correct
Malthusian doctrine is that to solve hunger crisis in Africa for example is to depopulate. They do this not only with lethal jabs but also jabs that sterilize.
Sustainability concept from UN is merely a front for Malthusian doctrine to depopulate and a great starting point for normies to explore. For real red and black pill concepts there are more compelling evidence indeed. However, for those starting on the journey being able to see the UN as a front for globalists has to be the starting point.
Covid-19 deaths rose dramatically among the triple vaccinated over the past 4 weeks but fell among the not-vaccinated. So a “Super Booster” campaign may be coming to a town near you, much sooner than you think…
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/16/england-fully-vaccinated-92-percent-covid-deaths/
SUPER. that word was saved for a reason 😂
NPC: Yeah but yeah but yeah more people are vaccinated so it makes sense these deaths will be higher vaccine is working tv tells me it works
Exactly! Lmao. Their confirmation bias is so easily predictable these days.
Oh, and don't forget nearly the all the high risk people are vaccinated and the majority of the un-vaccinated are young and thus low risk. Oh, but all those people should be vaccinated too!
Isn't this useless information unless we know how many people were vaccinated? If 20% are unvaxxinated but still account for 20% of deaths, then wouldn't that just mean the vaccine is neutral and not effective?
AT BEST. Precisely. Which would void all rationale for mandates and digital passport which is mostly what we are fighting against. We don't necessarily have to prove the vaccinated are dying en masses.
(Even though they are exhibiting increased rates of cancers and autoimmune disorders, etc... )
You're right about it killing the justification for the mandates, but they've got another insidious way to coerce you though. They'll claim their data shows less risk of hospitalization and death to the vaccinated, so they could change their Medicare and Medicaid rules to not reimburse any Covid related medical treatment and allow private insurers to do the same or to allow raised premiums on the un-vaccinated.
I'm fairly certain that they're not over 90% jabbed.
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
Considering the vaccines were supposed to protect people from hospitalization and death, you would expect 80%+ of the deaths to be among the unvaccinated.
That these numbers look like even distributions given the inferred vaccination rates shows the vaccines aren’t doing shit except causing clots and strokes for zero benefit.
I don't see the smoking gun here. Maybe someone can help me out?
The image of the chart (and the article Purkiss linked) says "Vaccinated" not "Fully Vaccinated", contradicting what the inserted commentary below it claims. According to the article, 92% of covid cases, hospitalizations, deaths have been from those who have had at least one dose. Coincidently, 92% of the UK population age 12 and over have received one dose.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833
So what's the big deal here? 92% of the population is vaxxed. 92% of hospitalizations, etc. should be from those who have been vaxxed.
Only 69.5% of the UK has recieved atleast 1 dose (numbers go down from there).
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
So, at best, the vaccine is basically useless.
At worst, it’s creating vaccine enhanced advanced disease, which was a reported potential risk in the first batch of Pfizer documents from ICAN
No, these numbers prove the Vaccinated have a higher death rate.
I haven’t read the report yet. Until I do so and actually examine in-group and cross-group characteristics/comparisons, I’m playing it safe and saying that the vaccines simply aren’t able to protect people like originally claimed.
If you haven't read the report yet then it makes sense to reserve judgement.
Forming and sharing an opinion off incomplete info is no better than spreading fake news...
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
The breakdown of vaccination—and the fact highest coverage is among the oldest age groups—makes me hesitant to say the vaccine killed them/produced worse outcomes because if Nana is 93, she’s far more likely to die from anything in comparison to, say, a 53 or 23 year old.
I’m not sure if the breakdown in the report goes into age groups specifically—I doubt it does, because the increase in mortality for younger people screws the narrative—but I’m hoping it’ll give me data for vaccinated/unvaccinated as well as an age group breakdown.
That’s why I can’t draw a conclusion from the headline—are we comparing similar demographics? Or did they just draw people out of a hat and shrug? Matched pairs would be ideal for this, but I guarantee we won’t get that kind of analysis on anything related to COVID or the vaccine.
So the knly take away here is that the Vaccine is irrelevant and has no meaningful POSITIVE impact.
NEGATIVE impact is "disputed" by some.
Ideally 100% of the death and hospitalization would be the unjabbed. If the percentage stays constant regardless of status then it’s hard to claim any positive benefits at all. When you factor in the mystery deaths and sudden collapse or myocarditis, the experimental jab juice doesn’t stand out as a positive thing to take. I realize NPCs will rationalize the deaths as a sign that it is working. They may be correct
And how do the "fully vaxxed" compare to the "vaxx-free" in all cause mortality?
I think it's extremely important to mention that this data shows the RATE of COVID deaths is higher for Vaccinated than unvaccinated.
Notice the green bar shrinks for not vaccinated in the death column. That means a higher rate of not vaccinated are recovering than vaccinated.
It is possible.
Then again those bioweapon labs in Ukraine may have been the staging ground for another plandemic wave as that is what they have planned till 2029.
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Bill Gates has said as much that they need to reduce the world population to combat poverty.
Bill Gates is a malthusian that believes the world population must be reduced.
Bioweapons in Ukraine are directly tied to the Covid scamdemic. Have patience, fren.
Malthusian doctrine is that to solve hunger crisis in Africa for example is to depopulate. They do this not only with lethal jabs but also jabs that sterilize.
Sustainability concept from UN is merely a front for Malthusian doctrine to depopulate and a great starting point for normies to explore. For real red and black pill concepts there are more compelling evidence indeed. However, for those starting on the journey being able to see the UN as a front for globalists has to be the starting point.
...and 100% of oxygen breathers died. Blame oxygen!