But yes the father's role is crucial. It's why I love that YouTube that t3aches you things fathers should teach their sons like how to change a tire, how to shave, and all sorts of handy things.
My dad made me learn those things before he gave me my first clunker car. Said he wanted me to know how to take care of myself out there. He also taught me to be wary of many mechanic shops that take advantage women because they see ignorance to vehicles.
Hogg-face doesn't realize that in many states you do still need a license to buy a gun or to carry. I've had to get both because my state is run by morons who don't want us to protect ourselves.
Maybe someone should point out that really licenses are unnecesary bs for a lot of things and should be optional, like a certification. Like, why should we need a license to drive, cut hair or hunt?
I dunno, a lot of laws to stop hunting. They could make more. Then the long dick of the Biden Gestapo would take people down when they're isolated at home.
Actually, driver's licenses in most states are only for use of the roads for profit by transporting people or goods. Even a truck driver bob-tailing it (without a trailer) is not in commerce.
In fact, Respondent has reason to believe and does believe that the making of false and unsubstantiated assertions of fact in a criminal complaint that a “transportation” offense has allegedly been committed by Respondent or any other similarly situated individual, while failing to assert within the body of the complaint and charging instrument(s) the necessary elements of both an actual “crime” and that the Accused was engaged in “transportation” at the time, and then proceeding to file that complaint and charging instrument in a court, is actually a crime of SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS under §32.48, Penal Code.
The facts and law supporting Respondent’s assertions and allegations herein should be obvious to even the most basically educated layperson, much less to an actual attorney or judge. Respondent can be a “driver” or “operator” only if Respondent is actually engaging in the regulated subject matter activity of “transportation,” just as an automobile or other conveyance legally becomes a “device” that can then be defined as a “commercial/ motor/ vehicle/ motorcycle/ moped” only when being “used” by a “driver” or “operator” to engage in “transportation,” which s/he could only do while also acting as a “carrier” that is “operating” a business for “compensation or hire.”
When you buy a gun, you have to show ID, hence driver’s license, passport or state ID. So why not to vote? You need an ID to withdraw larger sums of money put into your bank account, although you aren’t asked for an ZiD to deposit it! You need to show ID to check into any reputable hotel. To rent or buy a car, you must show ID. So how is it a hardship to show an ID to vote? Yes the second amendment assures your right to have and bare arms, but you also do need to show proof to have legitimate arms.
It’s a sad day when a woman has to teach a boy how to be a man.
Well his dad is CIA so...
She should teach him how to be a man too
Thought it was FBI.
Anyway. Clowns will be clowns.
YES!!! she could kick his soy-boy ass, too!! She posted some videos of her at the gym... she's way more manly than little hoggy!!!
Mama had some wisdom in helping her son be a man:
https://youtu.be/Oddo4MVeeBY
But yes the father's role is crucial. It's why I love that YouTube that t3aches you things fathers should teach their sons like how to change a tire, how to shave, and all sorts of handy things.
I forget who he is.
Shinedown does a good cover with less guitar work
https://youtu.be/rgFQ6WmxdMs
The original is awesome but Shinedown's version is straight fire!
My dad made me learn those things before he gave me my first clunker car. Said he wanted me to know how to take care of myself out there. He also taught me to be wary of many mechanic shops that take advantage women because they see ignorance to vehicles.
That is what is has come to unfortunately. A lot of young men are lost due to the MSM brainwashing.
Getting tired of MTG's rockstar persona. No one gives two shits about this kid. Represent your district, woman!
And, an adult shouldn't need a license for any of those other items, either.
Exactly!!
True true
Mic drop, exits stage right!
News flash Douche Hogg... cars aint in the bill of rights..or the constitution.... Q really had it right when he said these people are stupid..
David hogg is a fabrication. Why even speak to him. Anemic fuckface.
Hogg-face doesn't realize that in many states you do still need a license to buy a gun or to carry. I've had to get both because my state is run by morons who don't want us to protect ourselves.
I remember when Hog posted a reply to something/ in one of his posts where he said: Mentally unstable people should be able to buy guns...
The guy is freak of nature!
Maybe someone should point out that really licenses are unnecesary bs for a lot of things and should be optional, like a certification. Like, why should we need a license to drive, cut hair or hunt?
Kek
I dunno, a lot of laws to stop hunting. They could make more. Then the long dick of the Biden Gestapo would take people down when they're isolated at home.
Actually, driver's licenses in most states are only for use of the roads for profit by transporting people or goods. Even a truck driver bob-tailing it (without a trailer) is not in commerce.
https://tao-of-law.com/
In fact, Respondent has reason to believe and does believe that the making of false and unsubstantiated assertions of fact in a criminal complaint that a “transportation” offense has allegedly been committed by Respondent or any other similarly situated individual, while failing to assert within the body of the complaint and charging instrument(s) the necessary elements of both an actual “crime” and that the Accused was engaged in “transportation” at the time, and then proceeding to file that complaint and charging instrument in a court, is actually a crime of SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS under §32.48, Penal Code.
The facts and law supporting Respondent’s assertions and allegations herein should be obvious to even the most basically educated layperson, much less to an actual attorney or judge. Respondent can be a “driver” or “operator” only if Respondent is actually engaging in the regulated subject matter activity of “transportation,” just as an automobile or other conveyance legally becomes a “device” that can then be defined as a “commercial/ motor/ vehicle/ motorcycle/ moped” only when being “used” by a “driver” or “operator” to engage in “transportation,” which s/he could only do while also acting as a “carrier” that is “operating” a business for “compensation or hire.”
from https://tao-of-law.com/2016/03/11/challenging-the-complaint-in-a-transportation-related-offense-failure-to-state-all-legal-elements-means-insufficient-substance-and-notice/
Masculine line LMFAO 🤣
Brutal
I like her. She STANDS UP for good and right and just and tells it like it is.
When you buy a gun, you have to show ID, hence driver’s license, passport or state ID. So why not to vote? You need an ID to withdraw larger sums of money put into your bank account, although you aren’t asked for an ZiD to deposit it! You need to show ID to check into any reputable hotel. To rent or buy a car, you must show ID. So how is it a hardship to show an ID to vote? Yes the second amendment assures your right to have and bare arms, but you also do need to show proof to have legitimate arms.
Interesting how he came out of the woodwork just prior or during the latest false flaggot shooting