Beware the Watch the Water documentary. Jordan Sather weighs in.
(media.greatawakening.win)
📺 MEDIA PANIC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (229)
sorted by:
Exactly. Or that we are being given Satan’s DNA.
I wonder about Jordan.
Satan doesn't have DNA....He's a spirit...he is not physical.
... a spirit
... often working 1st in our heads, that we 2nd misuse our minds, eyes and tongues and then 3rd acting out with our hands, legs and the whole body.
Read literally the first book of the Bible
The rest of the bible's teaching on angels contradicts your poor interpretation of Gen 6.
No biblical support elsewhere that angels, fallen demons or otherwise, can have sexual relations with humans. Jesus suggest otherwise when he teaches about angels not having any ability to enter marriage (which implies inability to procreate)
Secondly, demons (fallen angels) are never called "sons of God" ever in the bible.
Thirdly, God's anger in Gen 6 is towards humans, not demons. Wouldn't have God sent a spiritual form of "flood" to judge the demons first since they would have initiated the evil in the earth?
The only reason this demon-seed view is popular is because it captures the human imagination so easily
I didn’t give you an interpretation so I’m not sure why you said my interpretation is poor, I simply told you to read your bible. You filled in the rest.
I’m terribly sorry to contradict you but let’s have a look at your ‘thirdly’ statement;
‘You say, Gods anger in Gen 6 is towards humans not demons. Wouldn’t have God sent a spiritual form of flood to judge demons first since they would have initiated the evil in the Earth?’
EXACTLY...! And that’s EXACTLY what God did. How do we know this? In 1 Peter 3:18-20 the Bible says
(18) For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the spirit. (19) After being made alive, He went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits - (20) to those who were disobedient long ago while God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built.
So, Jesus Christ’s very first act upon being resurrected from the dead was to visit the 200 fallen angels (imprisoned spirits) and proclaim His victory. You question why God didn’t flood the Earth to remove the angels/demons when verse 20 above tells you that’s EXACTLY what He did and why - “to those who were disobedient long ago while God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built.
I do not think Peter could have spelled this out much clearer.
I was pretty sure biblically demons are separate from fallen angels, in that the fallen calamity known as Lucifer would be the one who created them.
But then again, I don't subscribe to the Bible anyway as it is an incredibly fallible resource for any teaching. The fact that it is so open to interpretation as you put it is inherently proof enough to that point.
So in genesis it talks about the "sons of men" taking wives from the "daughters of men". Many have theorized that this is satan's fallen angels taking wives and having children with them, the "nephelim". The fallen Angel's would therefore have DNA of some kind.
I'm not saying any of this is absolute truth, just sharing the knowledge that I have acquired to add to the understanding of the people or sources that would say things similar.
Blessings fren.
That was a Jewish belief and got some traction in church history, but its 100% reading into the text what's not there. It's actually the weakest of 3 major views on who the "sons of God" were (not sons of men).
Yet, it's in the KJV Genesis Chapter 6, specifically verses 1-7.
The Bible has many conundrums, missing books, it's a compilation with missing chapters, which may have shed some light - but, IMHO, understanding these issues are just "bonus points", as our salvation is not based on a comprehensive test on the Bible, but rather in our faith in Christ.
If I am wrong, that's on me.
@smartbaum you are correct "sons of God" my fault. The dangers of texting on lunch break.
I havent heard any stronger arguments as to who they were, but I haven't exhaustively studied the subject either.
Thank you again for the correction.
Blessings.
You are correct friend and your interpretation spot on. 1 Peter 3:18-20 specifically describes Jesus’ first act after resurrection to visit those fallen angels from Gen 6 that cohabitated with human women and had children by them.
You are right. Stay with your gut - there are those trying to lead you astray on this thread. Reread Gen 6 and the immediate following story of Noah and the flood. The read 1 Peter 3:18-20 which sums it all up for you. May God bless you friend!
If anyone wants to check this podcast out, it is very informative. Most of what he says is unsure to me. He has put some things together for me. It is very interesting at least to consider. I havent found it to be blasphemous.
I enjoyed it.
Blessings frens, God wins.
He's not physical?! Why do people who don't know what the Bible has to say comment about things covered in the Bible?
Isaiah 14:16 talking about Lucifer: They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
Ya, where is the Jordan in this post?