Zelensky: "After this war Ukraine will be a great Israel"
(media.greatawakening.win)
ATTN: ALL JOOFAGS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (128)
sorted by:
I beg to differ. Douglas Reed wrote a book on this subject and traces the whole thing through time. Quite convincingly, I might add.
: The Zion controversy.
Or the Jewish question.
Jew = derogatory term for opprobrious behavior.
It is also quite clear that such a small portion of the population is capable.of hijacking every institution:
History of central banking and the enslavement of mankind, is another book I would recommend to read, because it shows why the current developments are necessary to enhance.this enslavement.
Enslavement of mankind based on the talmud. The talmud clearly shows that so-called goyim are at the Jew's disposition to do anything they wish.
They consider themselves the master race, while projecting this on to others.
You.want nazism? Read the talmud. Or read Deuteronomy, Leviticus, Numbers, Ezra, Nehemiah.The feodal system they love is clearly written including the enforcement.
The first.born is dedicated to their "God". Yes, the first-born of everything! That means your first-born.
Read and weap.
The same.with Qoran: everything on Earth is given to the apostle of God = Mohammed. What do you think this will mean? Yes, it includes you, your spouse, your kids, your stuff.
These people have been deluded into thinking this is real.
I just had an argument with a family member who quoted this from the Christian Bible.. God doesn’t mean literally sacrifice your first born, he means dedicate your first born (like christening) to Him. God never has asked for human sacrifices.
Also Jesus was Jewish. We really have to stop with this.
Was Jesus human? Did God not require that he be sacrificed as a lamb to redeem mankind's sins? As a Christian I could never understand God's need for blood sacrifice be it from an innocent person or animal. This requirement for death and the shedding of innocent blood always bothered me. Yes, the bible says the wages of sin are death but it also says we are all sinners. So God sets up a situation where he makes man incapable of fully resisting sin then requires death as the result of him sinning. Yes, faith has many mysteries but this is the one most vexing to me.
This is well said.
Well said. Simple and true.
So God created people with the ability to disobey, and punishes them for using their God given abilities?
This is one of the hardest for me also but I understand it more now. Those sacrifices of the old testament -there were different types,-were mostly eaten by the priests and their families. The meat and hides did not go to waste.
Each sacrifice was a personal cost as meat and grain were worked for, animals were raised and cared for. No sacrifice was a light thing.
Sin does cause death-look around us now and we can see the results. Plus each ritual and sacrifice was.to point us toward salvation and Jesus and the price He paid for us. The meaning of that price is profound.
If one understands who we really are, and the true facts of why we are in this flesh age, then everything becomes clearer. The wages of sin is death of the soul and the wages of insurrection is death to all involved. If God is a just God, this price had to be paid. But He loves His children. Jesus paid that price..
Q said something that the Bible alludes to many times-only at the precipice and about waking people up to the evil. So basically we needed to see what evil is and what evil does, and the price paid for that evil. Otherwise evil can never be truly abolished.
People forget that words are a symbol that we use to represent reality, not the actual reality itself. Everybody forgets this especially when it comes to religious matters. Anyway that you describe God, or describe the ultimate nature of the reality we experience falls flat, because it is simply a symbol rather than the actual reality. To take religious texts absolutely 100% seriously is to forget the fact that words are a symbol. Personally I like the example of equating these symbols to a finger pointing at the moon, but instead of looking up and seeing the actual moon, you suck the finger pointing to it, aka you put the words on a pedestal and revere the words all the while forgetting words are a symbol, not the actual reality itself. Another example of being bamboozled by words is the climate change crowd, if the weather deviates from how it is "supposed to be" during a certain "season", then it represents something bad that needs to be somehow changed. Yet once again they are forgetting that in reality there are no "seasons" it is once again, a symbol, sure we can get extremely convincing asserting that seasons are real, but in the end its still just words. This isn't saying that God doesn't exist, or that X religion is true while X religion isn't, it is simply pointing out that words are a symbol, no matter how much we prostrate ourselves before the written word, it will always just be words, and their "authority" will always come from you (you in a broad sense) who believes the word.
Mainly my point is this: don't get so caught up in the words of religious texts, whether it's the Bible, Quran, Upanishads, etc. The words all point to actual reality, an experience, and most people tend to focus 100% on the words, the symbol, rather than the reality these words point to. Words, no matter who speaks them, no matter who writes them, no matter how convincing they are, no matter how many people believe them, will always just be words.
Since Jesus was Jewish you think that makes all Jews good people ? I believe there is a word for that.
Jesus was not jewish as there is no such race. He was an Israelite in the line of David of the tribe of Judah.
Quite right. This is one of 5 falsehoods in which the Khazarian mafia work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power. This is why no matter how much this chutzpah is disproven, it continues to be used.
I am not going to debate your last contention.
I agree that the prophets clearly indicate that fire-offerings of the first born were not what God would ask. Instead he requires righteousness, humbleness and and love for thy neighbor.
However, that said, how well have you read your bible?
It is quite clear that human commandments were taught as a means to force observance and compliance. Think the question about who is my neighbor. This question is a direct result of Deuteronomy and the teaching of human commandments.
The moral law of the 10 commandments, these are in effect property rules, are quite clear. Y
Shall I go on? once you see the values behind those laws, you do not need 10. 2 is all you would need.
" love god above all else and your neighbor as yourself" - Jesus.
" if you do not love your neighbor, whom you have seen, you cannot love God, whom you have not seen" . - John
Easy peasy, max freedom and room for spirituality, instead of the works of the law, that only leads to one outcome: death.
When you move from this to the books I referenced, you will find something shocking, like Hamlet shocked his mother. Nowhere in the older books will you find strict adherence or even reference to Deuteronomy, Leviticus or numbers. These were later additions and attributions. instead you will find condemnation towards their animal sacrifices, their new moons, their sabbaths.
But, yet, they were sent into captivity. Why? For not holding the sabbath. Compliance. Not for something else.
They even give us the clue to that when in Josiah' s time, somewhere ins some remote recess of the temple, the books of Moses were found. That puts the writing of it straight into the 6th century/ 5th century.
When we now compare Nehemiah and Ezra to the above referenced books, you' ll find a radical, ethnocentric, supremacy seeking, hate-towards-others type of system based on strict compliance, enforced by the priest-class.
Compare this to the talmud .... you' ll be amazed.
When you read your bible carefully, you will find, Judea, Benjamin and the Levites are a different breed than the other 10 tribes. O yes, the latter are demonized. But that is usually done by the victors is it not? Who would challenge their contentions?
So, you can let others deny this for you, as much as you want. It does not change the facts. Once you are able to see through these mind games, you really are on the road to freedom.
The other option is their yoke. And it's heavy.
Much of what the old testaments believers i.e. (Gods people) were confronted with were Satans attempts to kill the Christ line.
God did many things in representation to keep His people believing the promise of genesis 3:15. The law, all of it was a foreshadowing of Christ coming.
God had a heck of a time 7ntil Mary said to Gabriel "behold the handmade of the Lord" hand made is doulee (gr). Feminine for the sold out committed servant.
She was the first to believe the promise. And hence we got our Savior.
If that is your view, Good for you! To me it is nothing more than a story. Whether it concerns real men, I have no way of confirming.
Yes, God is attributed with many things, like if they kept his commandments, he would bring the rains. Taking other people' s spiritual experiences as the undisputed truth, to me, seems illogical and alien. Although, I feel a closer kinship to the Jesus teachings than to the Pauline or Moses stories.
David, when I was a small boy, really was a hero to me. However, when I reached the age of reason and started reading for myself, what really totally made me disgust him was the story about him cutting the muscles of the horses. That is cruelty of a an unfathomable nature. Or how about Samson, cutting of the dicks of dead soldiers. Sociopaths, the lot of them.
Yes, so says Paul. I found his reasonings to be nice, but I consider it rather pharisaic. A lot of noise with some useful things. What you just quoted is not one of them. That one is confirmation bias. Not of you, but of Paul, and he had a vested interest to opine as such. Try and find confirmation of what you just said in the OT. .... Only post hoc reconstruction can do that.
I do not grasp your meaning ....Was it jolly good, did he have enough time to allow one of his angels to become a deceiving spirit ....or was it a terrible time?
And how would you know? Did he tell you? I have not heard such.
See, when I read these stories, I am reminded of all those stories from the holohoax. Stories of people who are backward in relation to modern technology and the modern world. (See Daniel: Sadrach, Mesach and Abednego)
You know Koine Greek! Nice!
I have to laugh deviously, though. My girl told me something akin, after 1 week of having sex. ....But all kidding aside ... this is exactly the point is it not? She knows exactly what to say to her man. And I eat it, hook line and sinker. What an afrodisiac!
How would you value such a story today: Your soon to be wife comes to you and says: listen I am pregnant by holy spirit because an angel visited me ..... ? I think Joseph is a nice guy. And Mary must have been quite the milf.
One of 14, I belief. I lost count. Sorry.
Why are there two commandments for having sex with another outside of marriage? (ergo, 7th and 10th)?
You have to ask? You either know the answer or are completely without knowledge.
How do you read?
Yes, people say bad things about Jews because they only know about the Pharisees and Sadducees, but tend to not know of the Essenes.
Paul was pharasee.
Yes, and he killed Christians, then Jesus stood before him.
Edit: technically, Saul was a pharasee and was born again in Christ as Paul.
Yes, but he was not an Edomite, but rather an Israelite with a Roman citizenship. This is reason why He heard the voice of the Lord.
Jesus was from the tribe of Judah and Levi through His mother..kings and priests.
Everyone that says they arr "Jew" are not. The word-Jew-is used to designate all 12 tribes.
The tribes were infiltrated long ago through gibeonites and in the Babylonia and Assyria captivities. Then on to Ashkenazi converts.
Herod also brought into the temple."priests" from Babylon. I wonder who/what they were.
Many "Jews" are called, "Christians" today. The wheat.
The tares are the synagogue if satan.
Just know that the "tares" are always found with the wheat wherever the wheat goes- and the tares infiltrate and corrupt.
They? The Askanizis you mean. Who just as the mod has said co opted the non askanazi jews position.
They usurp everything they touch. If all of Israel is now askanazi then I can see why you would confuse them as what some would call true biblical jews which is anybodies guess if any still exist.
Nice, but not accepted. Typical commentary to project the most favorable light, in short spin and propaganda.
Read it yourself.
However, ethical monotheist will achieve salvation? Thank God! At the very least I can now ask them if I am an ethical monotheist.
Still the masters.
I will by exception award you 1 bonus point minus by laziness and writing without knowledge.
Read it. You will find his style is not easy.
Then again .... Reds, Jews, same ilk:
Communism is essential Judaism.
But do trust George Orwell. It is the anti-anti-semitism that he carefully crafted, whereas this has nothing to do with anti-semitism.
I do agree, it is quite uneasy to admit, we have been lead down a path that is not in our best interest by the whole shebang.