Marshall law. MTG is not stupid. Why did she text this on Jan 17, 2021? More in comments...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Twitter is absolutely slaying her over “Marshall” instead of “martial”.
to be fair it makes my teeth grind too
:/
Yeah, it really is jarring. I say it was done for a reason.
me too. Also this seems fake. MTG thinks she needs to give Trump advice? !
You know, that is another angle. What if the Jan 6 committee is making up texts?
oh yes, very good
did you see that i found another George Washington for you?
Yes,so no one can claim anyone was calling for martial law.
She's drawing a LOT of attention over it. Could be on purpose.
Marshall Plan, martial law.
"Marsha marsha marsha" Twatter
Phone dictation error?
President Trump's tweets often misspelled words intentionally. It would always draw more attention to the tweets.
Yes!!
I think she is drawing attention to the former Chief Justice John Marshall. Many of the major decisions in his court confirmed the supremacy of the federal government and the Constitution over the states.
But why?
...and did she succeed in drawing attention to former Chief Justice John Marshall?
She succeeded for me!! 😂. But then again how many in the US know that there was a Chief Justice Marshall, whose court helped cement federalism? I can tell you from following @SharonSaysSo that there are not many!
A lot of people can't spell nowadays and no-one cares.
I can spell better then a lot of people.😃😃😃😃😃😃😃
It's MARTIAL, not Marshall
Who transcribed this? It was probably an intern.
Probably was talking to her phone. It happens to me all the time and I don't spell check.
Maybe a mixture of 18 USC 3053 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section3053&num=0&edition=prelim
and possibly along with one of Senator Marshall's passed bills (now laws)
Dealing with a National Quantum Initiative Act (DATA) https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227?r=13&s=3
or the DHS Field Engagement Accountability Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/504/text?r=23&s=3
Or Internet of Things Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020 or the IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1668?s=3&r=26 (Dominion :"publish standards and guidelines for the federal government on the appropriate use and management by agencies of IoT devices owned or controlled by an agency and connected to information systems owned or controlled by an agency, including minimum information security requirements for managing cybersecurity risks associated with such devices" )
Oooh, great digging! I am a federal contractor and had to research the Risk Management Framework which is getting inserted Into a lot of contracts. Like all things government, it is horrendously complicated by the documentation. But basically it is a process where the contractor shows the government it has the controls in place to mitigate adverse risk with their created product(s), especially by intrusion or having the software do unexpected things - like send data to China. The government then agrees with “Yea, verily” and the contractor is given the go ahead - the “Authority to Operate”. Cybersecurity risk is a big deal in DoD currently. But if you oversee voting machines... “meh”!
Is this a text or a transcript?