(Tracy Beanz) Sussmann is in deep trouble! (See top comment)
(media.greatawakening.win)
Durham Update
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Take a deep breath and think about this. Trump knew FBI was corrupt and tried to take down his presidency. Trump also knew how hard it is to bring this to the light given the way media and govt institutions protect each other.
So he did all that drama with Sessions and got these investigations going. Durham was so stealth that even in the leaky DC where everything leaks, his name was mentioned only when they were ready for it. (Q has a post on this).
Now, after Trump has been "gone" for more than a year, suddenly it starts raining. Do you think this would be possible if Durham was in anyway stoppable or even possible to put on a leash?
Now ask yourself this. Do you think they would have gone to all this trouble and waited all this time, just to catch Hillary? C'mon man!
Yes I think they are fully capable of using the Hillary campaign as the scapegoat to satisfy our sense of Justice while protecting the institutions that were without doubt collaborators in this treason. And everything coming from the SC points exactly in this direction.
Have we not witnessed decades of this type of duplicity? Why should we trust that this time will be different?
I hope Im wrong and fear Im not.
If that was the case, Trump could have spared the deep state, cut a deal, threw Hillary under the bus, become a hero, enjoyed a 2 term glorious presidency and rode off into the sun set.
SC has already established that CIA themselves knew the Sussman data was bogus. They are building the case methodically.
I mean, feel free to doom all you want, but thats not what we are seeing. We haven't even seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of Durham filings yet.
Im not trying to doom brother but three peoples opinions I respect, Tracy Beanz, Margot Cleveland and Sundance are all saying similar things here.
None of those three people have ever prosecuted a single case much less an insanely complex RICO case involving the worlds most powerful psychopaths.
They have ZERO lawfare experience. On the other hand, Durhams playing at a top tier level with no do overs if he fukks up.
Prosecutors who have handled RICO cases and who ARE very dialed in to what Durham has and is up to are "peoples opinions I respect" around Durham. Examples? Kash Patel and Trumps DNI Ratcliffe. Also @Techno_Fog.
Non lawyer emotionals like Sundance and Beanz? Absolutely not. Margot Cleveland the lawyer academic? Not for analysis around a RICO case lawfare death match.
For war analysis I prefer hearing from successful warriors, especially warriors with insider info and a history or courageous honesty.
Wait for Kash to cover this. He is more authoritative than any of these others.
Personally I find it quote obvious Sussman is being isolated, humiliated and paraded out in front of the DS.
I believe it's a mind game, to get them all shitting their pants.
EVERYONE involved after Sussman who....KNOWINGLY.... involved themselves in this plot will know their day is soon to come.
No one sees everything clearly right now. Fog of war.
You've missed the Key Element, The Swamp, and that is the one thing Trump wants to fully destroy....
We have four things in play:: Horse, Cart, Driver Goods in Cart....
The way you want it is:: Driver facing <, Cart Facing <, Horse facing >, Goods...
What we need is <Horse, <Cart, <Driver, Goods in Cart....
Horse = LAW.....
Cart = Courts/Investigations.....
Driver = SC...
Goods = Swamp +......
SC is simply unloading the Cart one Item at a time in the Order that they were Made/Loaded, FIFO......
Institutions are not collaborators. They are like cars, guns, and political parties. They are just vehicles. It's the people involved that determine whether the vehicle is benevolent or malignant. They are the ones that should be held to account, in such a public, humiliating, and punishing way, that NO ONE operating the vehicle would ever abuse their authority and position again.
Wait, back up just a little bit.....
You're putting the Cart two car lengths in front of the horse and expecting unreasonable results....
First he needs to get a conviction on the Primary Players, Sussman and others, THEN he can go after the FBI, CIA, etc....
He cannot go afet both at the same time because the EVIDRNCE in Sussmans Case needs to be proven BEFORE going after the Secondary Players.....
There are so many ways this could play out. What you outlined is just one scenario. He could get every one to turn on each other and m make them introduce evidence. He could have more indictments up his sleeve. He could have new filings for the previous indictment. And so on
IF, if I were a Prosecuter, I think I'd want it to play out the way he is moving it....
It seems more logical, and really straight forward.....